VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:18:54 04/28/05 Thu
Author: J.J.
Subject: NCAA football future?

Tons of info from the NCAA that serious changes will be made to DI football in the near future - 12 game schedules, BCS national championship game, elimination of IAA desigination but expansion of a playoffs and # of seeded teams, more "IA vs. IAA" type games, etc.

All this is great news for current IAA scholarship powerhouses like Delaware, UMASS, or Montana, but what will happen to the "mid-majors"? If DI football is to be classifed in the future as BCS (85 scholies) and Championship or Playoffs (60 scholies), how can the little guys survive? Won't all teams need at least 45 scholies (or eqivs) to compete at the "IAA" level. Right now even a team like Colgate or Maine can play mid-major CCSU yet also face a DI Buffalo or Army.

The NEC teams must be following this issue closely - so what's their plan? Albany appears to be moving toward the current IAA schoraship model (lots of future games vs. A-10 and PL schools). Stony Brook looks to be scheduling up about 2 games per year, and CCSU and Monmouth are not far behind but their intentions are not clear.

I know in 2 previous years CCSU faced back-to-back A-10 teams in the opening weeks and were crushed, but can the recent sucsess start an increased investment in football. Basicly I only see 2 choices - 1) increase the commitment to at least the level of a URI or Hofstra for the reincarnation of DI football, or 2) be happy to play a mid-major style with less than 20 team in the country. I just wonder what the NCAA will require form the current NEC, MAAC, and Pioneer schools that want to keep football in the future.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> Re: NCAA football future? -- J.J., 09:28:42 06/10/05 Fri

Another article of possible IA/IAA football changes from a Richmond (VA) paper.

-------
Panel: Rename football categories
Some I-AA members believe subdivision reference is negative

BY JOHN O'CONNOR
TIMES-DISPATCH STAFF WRITER Jun 10, 2005


Division I-AA could change its name, and cause a relabeling of Division I-A in the process.

Some members of the NCAA's I-AA football category, which includes seven Virginia schools, believe that the subdivision reference is a negative for their athletic programs. The highest level of college football competition is I-A, though all schools that play I-A and I-AA football are NCAA Division I members.

"There's a perception/branding/image issue that is real in some people's minds," said Dennis Poppe, the NCAA's managing director of baseball and football. "[I-AAs] are Division I schools, so why be given a different classification for football? I think there's certainly merit in their argument."

The NCAA Division I-AA Football Committee has recommended renaming I-A the "Division I Football Bowl Division," and I-AA the "Division I Football Championship Division." The committee contends that the changes would more accurately "reflect and celebrate" the differences between the groups.

I-A's scholarship ceiling is 85. That level includes mostly major colleges and plays bowl games rather than playoffs. I-AA, whose scholarship limit is 63, has a postseason tournament that concludes with a national-championship game, won in 2004 by James Madison.

JMU's coach, Mickey Matthews advocates renaming college football's top two divisions, and said "In golf, you had the Seniors Tour [being renamed] the Champions Tour, done with the same idea, that 'Seniors' has a bad connotation to it. 'I-AA' sometimes can have a bad connotation to it."

Jimmye Laycock, who has coached William and Mary for 25 years at both
the 1A and 1AA classifications and a leader in the reclassification effort, notes "our program today is actually at a more competitive level than when we were a 1A team. Our conference is tougher from top to bottom than some of the so-called Division I leagues."

Poppe said consideration of the divisional name changes by various NCAA committees would continue through the summer and fall. NCAA membership, the schools, will ultimately determine whether the football categories are renamed.

Virginia and Virginia Tech play I-A football. The state's I-AA schools are Richmond, William and Mary, James Madison, VMI, Hampton, Liberty and Norfolk State. Following the 2004 season, the league to which UR, W&M and JMU belong - the Atlantic 10 Football Conference - was ranked ninth among all Division I leagues, ahead of three I-A conferences (Conference USA, Sun Belt, Mid-American).

"The higher-tier I-AA programs, we'd be called 'mid-majors' in college basketball," Matthews said.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.