VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:28:05 03/14/06 Tue
Author: Steve Balino
Subject: Roulette Computer

This guy sold me a roulette system that did not work, the guy is a conman.

Stefano hourmouzis
he owns sites>
http://www.roulettesystemreviews.com
http://www.genuinewinner.com
http://www.roulettecomputers.com

Then find out the truth about him here>

http://www.stefanohourmouzis.com

Look at >
http://www.stefanohourmouzis.com,


The document regarding the court case and Stefano (Steven) Hourmouzis can be purchased here for around $20 if anyone wants to see what sort of person you are buying a roulette computer from and if he can be trusted.. The amount of pain and suffering that was caused to elderly people, parents putting away nest eggs for thier children, people saving for their spouses, none of them got any compensation from Mr Stefano (Steven) Hourmouzis. This was not a few people, but ran into thousands of people losing their investments through Stefano Hourmouzis. No compensation has been issued by Mr Hourmouzis, he now is dabbling in selling roulette computers. He is currently been investigated for making wild counterclaims against ourselves and trying to discredit competition. Go to this site>
http://www.legalcasedocs.com/directory.php

Do a find at the top of the page using> 'Hourmouzis'

This brings you to this link>

http://www.legalcasedocs.com/120/241/407.html

I actually got the document through a private investigat0r in Australia long be fore this site existed, but just so Stefano Hourmouzis cannot claim the document is a fake, I have included the document here.

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
COUNTY COURT
CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
MELBOURNE
MONDAY 30 OCTOBER 2000
BEFORE HIS HONOUR JUDGE STOTT
THE QUEEN v. STEVEN GEORGE HOURMOUZIS
SENTENCE
HIS HONOUR: Steven George Hourmouzis, you have pleaded guilty to two counts of making statements or disseminationing -information that was false in a material particular or materially misleading and likely to induce the purchase of securities by other persons contrary to the Corporations Law. The maximum penalty for those offences is a fine of $20,000 or imprisonment for five years or both.
You have also pleaded guilty to one count of interfering with, interrupting or obstructing the lawful use of a computer contrary to s.76E of the Crimes Act 1914. The maximum penalty for this offence is imprisonment for 10 years.
Count 1:
Between 12.40 a.m. on Saturday 8 May 1999 and 11.21 p.m. on Sunday 9 May 1999, you sent in excess of three million spam Email messages to addresses in Australia, the United States and possibly elsewhere, which addresses were provided to you by an associate. The messages were transmitted through an internet service provider, Mondial Net Pty Ltd following the prior purchase by you of six prepaid internet access kits under false names. You used a computer at your home to transmit the messages and two telephone numbers through Telstra telephone lines to connect with the Mondial facilities. The messages were relayed through nine mail servers who were said by your associate to be suitable but without their knowledge or consent. The text of the message was identical. You composed it. Several different sender names were used, the majority of which were false. The messages concerned a US corporation Rentech Inc, which was listed on the NASdaq Exchange. Among other things the messages said:
"lmminent outstanding company news and profit potential too great to ignore.
Dear Investor, analysts have predicted a plus 900 per cent rise in Rentech stock over the next few months due to recent developments and imminent company news. As Rentech has new superior and patented technology scheduled for release, Rentech stock will only dramatically increase in value and immediate purchase before the promotion of several imminent releases while the stock is barely 50 cents a share, virtually guarantees phenominal profit, possibly plus 900 per cent over the next few months. Careful investigation will indicate our research is accurate and will reveal Rentech's phenominal profit potential. It will generate returns far greater than any other stock or investment programme. As a buying frenzy is anticipated over the next few days, we advise you to act promptly to maximize returns. Sent on behalf of VSP Financial by Growth Successes Strategies."
VSP was a false name and was not an investment adviser, there were no imminent news releases or patent and no recent development. The other words, wherever the message purported to state a fact it was false.
Count 2:
During the same weekend you caused messages to be posted on Internet Bulleton Boards situated in the United States and operated by Yahoo Inc and Raging Bull, both of which companies provided internet services offering financial news to internet users. The messages were identical. Having referred to Rentech, they said:
"This stock is going up once the pending patents are released. YOU would be crazy to sell anything -below $3 in a few months from now. I just bought 20 K shares of Rentech. I have done some close research on these guys."
As previously stated there were no pending patents. Again you composed the message but it would appear your associate assisted by making the Bulletin Board postings.
Count 3:
In sending out the spam Email messages you relayed them through a number of third party servers. That modus operandi was chosen to minimise the risk of detection as it gave the appearance to recipients of the messages, that they had emanated from therelayed servers. It also enabled you to utilise the services of those mail servers to on-send many hundreds of thousands of Emails over a short period of time and saving yourself the cost of doing so. The utilisation of the third party mail servers' facilities in this way resulted in no damage to them but time was lost by them when they had to shut the servers down in order to clear them of the messages. It also gave rise to concern for the reputation of those commercial businesses and concern that someone had gained access to the servers.
It is no coincidence that when the NASdaq opened for trading on Monday 10 May 1999, trading in Rentech shares was approximately 10 times the average daily trading volume and the share price doubled before trading was halted pending an announcement to be made by the company.
Rentech issued a press release denying the statements made in the Email messages. The next day when trading resumed, Rentech shares fell from an opening price of 71 cents per share to a closing price of 31 cents per share. On 5 May 1999, through brokers in Canada, you bought 65,000 shares in Rentech Inc at a limit of 50 cents per share. On 10 May 1999, having seen some messages of complaint and references to someone going to gaol for it, you panicked and instructed your broker to sell the shares. You made a profit of $17,000, $7,000 of which you gave to your associate. The balance you placed in other investments.
It is clear that considerable deliberation, planning, care, skill and sophistication was involved in implementing your plan. As early as 27 April 1999, you sent your associate an Email message which said:
"This is illegal but I like it. Just don't mention anything to anyone about anything until we purchase the stock and always keep our true identity very concealed."
This illustrates that not only were you aware your planned conduct was unlawful but that you wished to proceed with it for personal gain. And that is what eventuated as did steps taken to conceal your identity.
When asked about that message in your record of interview, your answers were evasive and unconvincing. The message also makes it difficult to accept the submission made on your behalf that you had no real understanding of the consequences of your planned action.
As a result of your action, resources, both financial and personal had to be expended to investigate the spam problem, to implement anti spam defences and to deal with complaints. Some of the Internet addresses were blocked for a period, upsetting the ability of those -businesses to communicate. All these matters gave rise to a concern about the negative effect upon their commercial operations. In addition, in relation to the first two counts, your conduct had the potential to result in loss to investors, in loss of investor confidence in the system and in adversely impacting on the integrity of the stock market.
Information technology is now an indispensable part of daily life. It is a powerful tool with global application. When misused, the capacity to misinform, mislead and cause harm is immense. When the misuse is illegal and of the nature which your offending was, you and other users of the Internet have to be aware that the : courts will regard the offences as sufficiently serious as to call for the imposition of a custodial sentence nothwithstanding the absence of prior convictions.
In mitigation a number of matters was relied upon. Firstly, you were co-operative with police in a lengthy record of interview and answered all questions and made admissions. Secondly, you pleaded guilty at what was, in effect, the first opportunity. You are entitled to be dealt with more leniently than 1 would otherwise have been disposed to by reason of that plea and its timing as it saved the time and expense of a potentially lengthy and complex trial. Thirdly, you have no prior convictions. Fourthly, your personal circumstances.
You are a 24 year old single man living with your parents. You have two older brothers. No member of your family has ever been in trouble with the authorities. You have enjoyed a stable life to date and a close relationship with your family. Your upbringing was unremarkable and you completed Year 12 at Doncaster Secondary College. At school you joined the Air Training Corps rising to the rank of sergeant. You later failed to gain selection for the Airforce despite two attempts to do so. You abandoned an applied physics course at RMIT upon finding it did not suit you. You had your own computer from the age of 21 and began exploring the Internet and its possibilities and became interested in marketing concepts and promotions and in 1997 started up your own business, selling educational products including study skill guides and software programmes until 1998 when you became involved in promoting web sites and products and you have worked intermittently as a consultant in that area to date with an irregular income. You are currently engaged in working with a non profit research organisation and the Department of Energy, to promote alternative energy and transportation research.
References from family and friends speak of you as an honest and caring young man and of the offences being out of character and of your having exhibited remorse.
As a result of your conduct in these offences, United States SEC has obtained judgment against you in the District Court of Colorado for about 15,800 US dollars which judgment remains unsatisfied.
The thrust of the submission made on your behalf was that if I were of the view that the offending in this particular case was too serious to be dealt with by anything less than a custodial sentence, then I should take the step of wholly suspending any such sentence. The Crown's response was that the seriousness of the offences called for a custodial sentence, but that having regard to the matters raised in mitigation, a custodial sentence not requiring an immediate term of imprisonment would be within the range.
Thus it falls to me to determine what is an appropriate sentence having regard to all the circumstances, to the matters already referred to, and to the.matters referred to in s.16A of the Crimes Act as well as the abolition of remissions in Victoria as required by s.16G. Having given the matter anxious consideration I sentence you to be imprisoned for a period of two years on each count. Each sentence is to commence today and be served concurrently. I order that upon you giving security in the sum of $500 by recognisance that you will be of good behaviour for the period of two years, you be released after you have served three months.
I am obliged by s.16F of the Crimes Act to explain the sentence to you and do so in these terms. The purpose of the sentence is to reflect the gravity of the offences and to deter you and others who may be minded to commit similar offences but, having regard to the matters raised in mitigation, spare you the need to serve the full term of two years. After you have served three months you will then be released. Should you be of good behaviour for two years, that will be the end of the matter. On the other hand, should you reoffend within that period and break the recognisance you will be brought back to court with the distinct likelihood that you will then be required to serve some part of the balance of the term between the three months you would have served and the period of two years. There is also a right to apply to the court in the future to have your recognisance discharged or varied. You may be seated until the recognisance release order is prepared.
(Order signed and acknowledged)
Yes, remove the prisoner.
Back to: Judgments Contents Page
Disclaimer, County Court of V

------------------------------------------------

I did find a genuine site and I am now happy with my product>

http://www.computeroulette.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.