Bits of NY Post review -- David Warner: The Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject:

Bits of NY Post review

Author:
Melissa

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:24:23 07/16/01 Mon
In reply to: Cin�philia 's message, "A first review of Major Barbara" on 05:20:24 07/13/01 Fri

Clive Barnes of the NY Post describes DW as 'suavely cunning' as arms maker Andrew Undershaft, and plays him as a 'silky Machiavelli with a handsomely understated yet insidious panache.' What does John Simon know anyway.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: Bits of NY Post review
Author: Jen (off to bed) [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 19:16:08 07/16/01 Mon >Clive Barnes of the NY Post describes DW as 'suavely >cunning' as arms maker Andrew Undershaft, and plays >him as a 'silky Machiavelli with a handsomely >understated yet insidious panache.' Now that sounds like our man! >What does John >Simon know anyway. That's right!! Thanks for the cheering up!

[> [> Subject: They're actually expecting us to pay for the rest of this?
Author: Jen [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 18:26:46 07/19/01 Thu What are they, nuts? They list practically all the others going back months, why not this one? I tried punching in direct URLs, but I can't figure out their system. Yeesh...