My Pleasure, Jen -- David Warner: The Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: My Pleasure, Jen

Author:
Melissa

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:03:43 07/17/01 Tue
In reply to: Jen 's message, "Thank God (oops, thank *you*!)" on 09:19:36 07/17/01 Tue

'The big problem with the Voice is, all the reviewers
>feel they have to justify themselves by leading into
>the actual review with some postmodern lit class
>lecture full of unjustifiable historical "insights"
>like "That is, assuming you could get them to sit
>still for an evening of continuous unrhymed talk
>spouted in a context of relatively naturalistic
>behavior by people dressed in the quaint fashions of
>100 years ago." And how long ago was Titanic released?'

I know what you mean, Jen. This tendency of the Voice drives me crazy. It's a critique, guys, *not* a term paper!!

'There's some criticism that he's hanging back (echoed
>elsewhere; the show seems to have been put together
>quickly to sub for a cancelled play and they all may
>still be rehearsing onstage) but it's articulate
>enough that it seems the person was paying close
>attention and wants to be encouraging.'

I didn't get the sense that DW was hanging back. His performance is, perhaps, deliberately low-key until the last act when he raises his voice (magnificently :-)!) in Undershaft's big speech. What I found particularly memorable was just watching him when he had no lines and was just observing and listening to the other actors. He was absolutely riveting. Now that's the sign of a superb actor.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Subject: Y'all know who you are
Author: Snake Priestess [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 14:12:58 07/17/01 Tue Yes, we do. *smiling evilly, and very satisfied.