Re: Libby's statement -- ACTIVATE

[ VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:07:57 03/02/01 Fri
Author: Crypto
Subject:

Re: Libby's statement
In reply to: fringer 's message, "Libby's statement" on 07:05:29 03/02/01 Fri

>Did you catch Libby's statements regarding his
>involvment with Rich? It was previously reported he
>had no dealings with Rich, and now it seems he did.
>They did say he had no dealings with Rich at or near
>the time the pardon was requested, but......still
>makes me wonder how much begging of the question is
>going on.

Yep, saw his testimony but there was more. He stated under oath for the record THAT HE FOUND NO CRIMINALITY!!!!!

INTERESTING PARADOX FOR YOU. If Rich renounced his US citizenship, then he is no longer subject to US laws. Right? Now the feds are saying that they didn't accept his renouncement of citizenship. So the question is since when do they have the power to say yeah or nay? Was that refusal based on the fact that if they refused to accept it they could still go after Rich for US taxes earned overseas? HMMMMM.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Libby's statement -- NKLS Cody, 11:52:31 03/04/01 Sun
- freedom of choice -- fringer, 16:34:26 03/04/01 Sun
  - Exactly, I think we saw a good tragic example... -- NKLS Cody, 21:28:57 03/06/01 Tue

[ VoyUser Login ] Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* Notice: Posting problems? [ Click here ]
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

* Name (required):

Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>>Did you catch Libby's statements regarding his >>involvment with Rich? It was previously reported he >>had no dealings with Rich, and now it seems he did. >>They did say he had no dealings with Rich at or near >>the time the pardon was requested, but......still >>makes me wonder how much begging of the question is >>going on. > >Yep, saw his testimony but there was more. He stated >under oath for the record THAT HE FOUND NO >CRIMINALITY!!!!! > >INTERESTING PARADOX FOR YOU. If Rich renounced his US >citizenship, then he is no longer subject to US laws. >Right? Now the feds are saying that they didn't >accept his renouncement of citizenship. So the >question is since when do they have the power to say >yeah or nay? Was that refusal based on the fact that >if they refused to accept it they could still go after >Rich for US taxes earned overseas? HMMMMM.
Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.