VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:14:05 08/17/04 Tue
Author: 但新的改革,只一味要學其他人,忽略了本質,也忽略了這些學生的需要。坦白說,如果同樣要付這麼多學費,但珠海只提供這種程度的師資、資源和校舍,我為什麼不去唸樹仁?國以民為本,學校也應以學生為本。自尊自大,最後只貽笑大方罷了。
Subject: 一直以來,珠海都擔負了讓還想唸書的年輕人,還有一個進修的機會。他們可能半工讀,也可能是後知後覺的學生,也可能是付不起高昂學費的苦學生,而珠海也一直他們最後的一個讀書機會而存在。
In reply to: 's message, "理性o的啦,No Name" on 03:42:30 08/17/04 Tue


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.