Re: Team rankings for next year in the wrc -- WRC FOOTBALL FORUM

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3 ]

Subject: Re: Team rankings for next year in the wrc

Author:
Bulldog#21

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:27:49 06/15/01 Fri
In reply to: the inventor of the light bulb 's message, "Team rankings for next year in the wrc" on 16:17:16 04/06/01 Fri

>ok i have looked at these team depth charts and from
>what i already know i can make a good observation.
>In the North:
>1)Solon: Reasons are simple Sean Miller is way too
>good a back to be shut down by Mayfield. Mayfield you
>just choke against them and that is all their is to be
>said. Hallman is a stud but I dont think he is as good
>as he is built up to be. Their line will dominate
>every other team's though so they will win north.
>2) Mayfield: Breeden and Delguyd are supposed to be
>like Malone and Stockten but really they are overated.
>They are great players but they dont show up against
>the great teams. Mayfield's line is also small
>compared to everyone's else and they dont have a
>passing game even if Nally is back. Your WR are below
>average. They have a good front 7 but secondary is not
>great on pass coverage. They will be tough but can be
>beaten. They have an easy schedule besides Solon so
>they will win a good number of games.
>
>3) Brush: Roy Hall is the best player in this
>conference.As long as he plays well they will play
>well.
>
>4) Nordonia: Sims anchors this team. I dont know if
>they will be bad or good. They wont be awful but they
>wont be amazing either. We will see how good they are
>after Mayfield this year.
>
>5) Kenston: They are a darkhorse but i dont think
>they are favorites against any of these teams. And
>ihope there freshman class to be soph's sucks since
>they think they are so sweet.Just one problem u guys
>play for Kenston.
>
>6) Twinsburg: They will easily lose them all in the
>conference. No Mike Smith = no offense or Defense.
>
>SOUTH
>
>1) Cuyahoga Falls- This is the toughest call to make i
>think it's them and Hudson but since they have title i
>will go with them but it would not suprise me if they
>lost. Clegg anchors the o-line. On paper they look big
>but no way they are athletic or as good as past
>year's. As for the backfield they have none. Only way
>they can score is a pass to matvie or Scott but they
>can't score 4 times a game combined. Falls always
>prides itself on a good running game. Which i doubt
>they will have and with a tough schedule they will
>have to earn wins. We will see what happens with them.
>Let's hope Tommy is as good as Scott's shadow.
>
>2)Hudson- Hudson has the most talent returning but
>hudson usually sucks even though this class was good
>as freshman on the forum it says they lost guys so i
>dunno how good they will be. Carducci is a good back
>and is better then fall's or stow's. On Defense they
>will be best in conference. But there O-Line is by far
>the worst ever. If they are to beat Falls they need
>them to step it up. Cause at the skill positions
>hudson beats everyone possibly in wrc.
>
>3)Kent- Marcus Parham is a stud running back and
>rodgers can play ball. And with that new big kid they
>will have a better line. But Kent's D is not that
>great but their runnning back will score points even
>with a bad line. If Parham does good so will Kent.
>
>4)Stow- I dont see any offense on this team anywhere.
>You guys say u have good WR But everyone has seen them
>and they are nothing special speed wise or hands wise.
>So they are some what tall every team has that. RUhlin
>is no Jamoni and your line is not even close to being
>as great as last year. Your D is all Shane Brandy.
>Besides that u have nothing.
>
>5)Barberton- umm not very good team.
>
>6)Ravenna- dukes = 2 wins

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]