VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:46:33 12/01/02 Sun
Author: Uncle Fester
Subject: Watkiss or Haslam out?

Something has got to be done, now not later. Someone has to take full responsibility. The question is tho who?

Well Watkiss picks the team you may say, true, but he has been forced to sign a div 2 reserve player, a conference centre back, all on frees, the list goes on. Haslam has not supplied Stuart enough funds for him to build a decentish team good enough to keep us in this division.

You may say what about Larkin 150,000. Well i can say we have done bad buying him cos maybe we would have got a couple of decent div 2 reserves for a petty 150k. Haslams gotta put the money where his gob is so we have some chance of surviving.

On the other hand Watkiss i think is doing the job to the best of his ability with the funds etc what he has available. His best just may not be good enough to how he was as no.2 and youth team boss. Then again what else can he do? Fair enough he must take some responsibility for the "i can't be arsed to work my arse off for this club" players he puts out. Some are good enough as shown in small patches this season. So what not most games don't they give their all, instead of 45 mins at a most per game.

Whats your call, who's fault is this do you reckon?

Sorry if you can't understand this, i'm still drunk from last night.

Cheers

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.