Re: Question on these new regs? -- United Hunters of Florida (UHF)

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/26/24 5:50:31am [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01/ 6/08 10:05:05am
Author: wayne davis
Subject: Re: Question on these new regs?
In reply to: markm 's message, "Question on these new regs?" on 01/ 6/08 1:27:53am

>archery - one antlered or one antlerless deer per
>person per permit, family hunt - one antlered and one
>antlerless deer per permit, muzzleloading gun and
>general gun - one antlered deer per person per permit
>per season, spring turkey - one gobbler per person per
>permit; antlered deer must have at least one antler
>with three or more points, each point one inch or more
>in length;
>
>Why is the word "OR" in the Archery hunt area when
>referencing taking of deer... it's the same way on
>all new WMAs!
>
>Archery should allow both, this is Primitive weapons
>hunting, you have to have the deer no more then 40
>yrds away for a shot.... It has always been that way,
>i see no need to change it! especially when they want
>it to be three points or better also!
>
>Mark

Mark, Glad you bought this. Is this not what you and the UHF support to stop some of the gaming caused by transferable permits. I thought you supported 1 deer permit in order to stop some of the gaming. Now I guess you want some exceptions. As I said in the other post all this does is complicates the regs in the name of transferable permits. Be carefull what you wish for!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Question on these new regs? -- Markm, 01/ 6/08 2:00:38pm
- Re: Question on these new regs? -- wayne davis, 01/ 6/08 10:35:18pm
Re: Question on these new regs? What the UHF has been doing? -- markm, 01/ 6/08 4:08:40pm