Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- United Hunters of Florida (UHF)

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

07/13/25 11:36:39am [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04/25/07 5:36:01pm
Author: Ralph E Fasano (EXCELLENT RULE)
Subject: Re: Potential 3 point Rule
In reply to: Casey 's message, "Potential 3 point Rule" on 04/16/07 4:41:20pm

>UHF Members and Guests,
>This is the best way to way to grow bigger "BUCKS". I am for this type of deer managment.We also need to plant more food plots in the management areas. Thank you
> On Friday April 13th, your President, Jim Casselman
>attended a FWC Deer Management Stakeholders Meeting.
>At which time, the FWC team gave him a list of 17
>management areas, that they would like to potentially
>change to 3 points or better on one side. This has not
>been proposed to the Commissioners yet for a vote. Now
>is the time to let us know your feeling on this. Jim
>will be able to voice your concerns to the Team next
>month before any finally decision is made. The list of
>potential management areas are as follows:
>
>North Central Region:
>
>Big Shoals WMA
>Jennings Forest WMA
>Snipe Island WMA
>Tide Swamp WMA
>
>Northeast Region:
>
>Baird Unit - Richloam
>Bull Creek WMA
>Caravell Ranch WMA
>Guana River WMA
>Seminole Forest WMA
>
>Northwest Region:
>
>Apalachee WMA
>Pine Log WMA
>
>South Region:
>
>Dinner Island WMA
>Jones/Hungryland WEA
>Spirit of the Wild WMA
>
>Southwest Region:
>
>Arbuckle WMA
>Lake Marion Creek WMA
>Upper Hillsborough WMA
>
>At this time all the above have a 5� above the hair
>line rule. Please note we currently have 14 WMA�s with
>3 points or better on one side, 3 WMA�s with 4 points
>or better on one side and 1 WMA with a forked horn
>rule. Is this a good or bad idea and why?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- AlanK (Confused), 04/25/07 6:02:18pm

Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- Jim ((Excellent Points made by all)), 04/26/07 11:23:20am

Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- Wayne Davis, 04/26/07 11:33:58am

Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- Jim, 04/27/07 2:06:01pm
- Re: Potential 3 point Rule -- Markm, 05/ 1/07 1:00:01pm