Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ] |
Subject: Re: Nate Minnoy | |
Author: joemoms |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 05:36:41 08/20/03 Wed In reply to: JD 's message, "Re: Nate Minnoy" on 10:01:46 08/19/03 Tue You are wrong when you say it didn't affect Minnoy's stock at Big Time. Are you kidding me? Coaches were going ga-ga over him, especially since he was essentially the only player doing well on the fire. Minnoy was a beast at Big Time, and A LOT of people noticed. >I agree that Minnoy should have stayed with Old Gold. >However, I believe there were more than 100 coaches >and scouts at Big Time and LA as well - just different >ones. > >Whether it was a mistake or not, it's obvious that it >was, but for another reason. It did not effect his >stock as an individual player at all, but has affected >him being viewed as a team player. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
Subject | Author | Date |
Re: Nate Minnoy | OG player | 06:33:09 08/20/03 Wed |
Re: Nate Minnoy | JD | 15:32:20 08/20/03 Wed |
Re: Nate Minnoy | Enquiring Minds Wanna Know | 16:34:22 08/20/03 Wed |
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |