Anti-tethering law proposed for the state of NC -- SMASH MOUTH BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Anti-tethering law proposed for the state of NC

Author:
VSBA

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:11:14 03/28/07 Wed

**Please forward to EVERYONE**

Charliea@ncleg.net, Austina@ncleg.net, Toma@ncleg.net, Boba@ncleg.net, Marcb@ncleg.net, Dougb@ncleg.net, philbe@ncleg.net, stanb@ncleg.net, Harrisb@ncleg.net, Juliab@ncleg.net, Andrewb@ncleg.net, Harryb@ncleg.net, Peterb@ncleg.net, Danielc@ncleg.net, Janetc@ncleg.net, Walterd@ncleg.net, Charlied@ncleg.net, Katied@ncleg.net, Done@ncleg.net, Tonyf@ncleg.net, Jamesf@ncleg.net, Lindag@ncleg.net, Eddieg@ncleg.net, Steveg@ncleg.net, Malcolmg@ncleg.net, Kayh@ncleg.net, Fletcherh@ncleg.net, Davidh@ncleg.net, Nealh@ncleg.net, Jimja@ncleg.net, Clarkj@ncleg.net, Edwardj@ncleg.net, Johnk@ncleg.net, Elliek@ncleg.net, Vernonm@ncleg.net, martinn@ncleg.net, Robertp@ncleg.net, Jeanp@ncleg.net, Williamp@ncleg.net, Joeq@ncleg.net,Tonyr@ncleg.net, Larrys@ncleg.net, Freds@ncleg.net, Johnsn@ncleg.net, Rcsoles@ncleg.net, Richards@ncleg.net, abs@ncleg.net, Jerryt@ncleg.net, Davidw@ncleg.net

Here are the emails for the people to vote on this bill soon. I encourage you to write them. Let them know that a responsible owner and an irresponsible owner could be given an animal, keep it tethered, and at the end of the study the one who gave the dog the socialization, attention, care and love would have an animal that would be able to be safely in society without problems....and tried to explain to them the method of containment isn't as important as the time and attention given to the dog while being contained.
So please write and give your opinion as to why they shouldn't vote for the anti-tethering law!

Law Proposed http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/Sessions/2007/Bills/Senate/HTML/S1172v1.html

Volunteer State Bulldogger Association
www.vsbulldoggerassoc.com

Support us by supporting our sponsors, click to visit their website -

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]