Re: Not so fast! -- The Camelot Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Re: Not so fast!

Author:
Bedwyr

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:06:44 11/19/01 Mon
In reply to: Lamethu 's message, "Re: Not so fast!" on 11:55:38 11/19/01 Mon

Yeah, Lam, I know what Neo's talking about... If you ever have to go to hell with no resistances, then you'll notice that your warrior will block the witches' blood stars with your shield. Basically, what he's saying is as long as you don't run into two many enemies, you can use Gotterdamerung's 60 AC and +20 all attributes to your advantage, not worrying about resistances. My only concerns would be similar to his, which would be excessive enemies casting excessive spells thus block-locking you and also advocates using fireballs due to their "splash damage", which is pretty vicious in hell/hell with no fire resist. Anyway, to sum up, you could block spells as if they were arrows, which would be optimal if using a Stormshield and some kind of item with the Harmony suffix.

Semper Fi,
Pro Rege,
Bedwyr

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: Not so fast!	Lamethu	11:35:28 11/20/01 Tue