VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]
Subject: Some facts for U


Author:
Gene
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 16:14:45 12/21/05 Wed
In reply to: Gene 's message, "asthma" on 14:23:02 12/21/05 Wed

In 1950, less than 2% of the world's population had asthma and prior to the 1960's asthma was not generally regarded as a fatal illness. Over recent years, the number of people suffering from asthma has increased at an alarming rate. Since the 1980's the incidence of asthma has more than doubled and the American Lung Association believes it will double again by the year 2020.
Asthma Statistics Number of Asthma Suffers is on the Rise
• Over 17 million people in the US had asthma in 1998
• Incidence of asthma cases are projected to double by 2010 predicts The American Lung Association.
• 42% increase of asthma among males between 1982 and 1994.
• 81% increase of asthma among females between 1982 and 1994.
• An estimated 4.8 million U.S. children (under 18) were affected by asthma in 1994.
• The number of people with self reported asthma increased by 29% from 1990 to 1994, from 10.4 million to 14.6 million.

Medical Treatment & Death
• Asthma is the 9th leading cause of hospitalization in the US
• Deaths from asthma were up over 200% from 1979 to 1997, from 2596 deaths to 5434 deaths.
• 50% increase in doctor and hospital visits due to asthma in one decade to 14 million per year. This included 1.6 million visits to emergency rooms, the doctor-of-last-resort to many people without health insurance.
• Asthma was the first-listed diagnosis in 468,000 US hospital admissions in 1993. 3
• Asthmatic youngsters under age 15 underwent 159,000 hospitalizations in 1993, with an average length of stay of 3.4 days. 2,3
• Among 5-24 year olds, the asthma death rate nearly doubled from 1980 to 1993.
• In 1993, blacks aged 5-24 years old were 4 to 6 times more likely to die from asthma than whites.
• In 1993 males were 1.5 times at greater risk of dying from asthma than females. 6

Cost of Asthma
• $12.6 billion - the estimated direct and indirect costs of asthma the USA in 1997.
• Asthma treatment cost an estimated $6.2 billion in 1990, including direct and indirect expenditures; 43% of that total cost was associated with emergency room use, hospitalization, and death.
• Loss of school days caused decreased productivity that cost an estimated $1 billion in 1990.
Sources:
1. Adams, P.F., Benson, V; Current Estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Statistics; 10(181), 1991.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Vital and Health Statistics, Current Estimates From the National Health Interview Survey, 1994 (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics); DHHS Publication No. PHS 96-1521; December 1995.
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Vital and Health Statistics, National Hospital Discharge Survey: Annual Summary, 1993 (US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Center for Health Statistics); DHHS Publication No. PHS 95-1782; August 1995.
4. Taylor, W.R., Newacheck, P.W.; Impact of Childhood Asthma on Health; Pediatrics; 90(5):657-662, 1992.
5. Evans, R.; Asthma Among Minority children: A Growing Problem; Chest; 101(6):368S-371S, 1992.
6. Centers for Disease Control; Asthma Mortality and Hospitalization Among children and Young Adults, 1980-1993 ; MMWR; 45(17):350-353, May 3, 1996.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Some facts for U


Author:
Gwen
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:32:51 12/21/05 Wed

Well, those statistics sure do spark some thoughts, Gene! As a matter of fact, it's an excellent question: why have asthma rates gone up so much if not for toxins in the air? I agree, there were more cement plants, more steel mills etc back in the "day" as you might call it and surely one would surmise those industries would cause respiratory problems. I have actually read letters in the newspaper were people who lived near these plants in Columbia County said they never had any problems. But the problems have to come from somewhere. Purportedly new, modern technology is supposed to help alleviate respiratory troubles from emissions. But, if these plants are newer than the ones that were around in the studies...that doesn't appear to be happening. (Or they might not be new...I don't know.)

It did occur to me perhaps the reason for the rise is more instances of reporting the problems. Now-a-days diagnosing problems and the numbers of people visiting physicians may be more than when the plants were around and that could distort the numbers. But even so, if the rates were really the same then, we have the same problem.

Bottom line on the asthma issue is what is causing it and I'm not the expert on this subject, so I can't guess. But that was a good point, Gene. SOmething to chew on.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Some facts for U


Author:
Gene
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:54:35 12/22/05 Thu

Gwen, it was said some where, I think in the Dakotas where the working poor were less susceptible to asthma than the people who has an abundance of resources, say like money. Do you think life style has more to do with it than air pollution?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Some facts for U


Author:
Gwen
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:54:34 12/22/05 Thu

Gene, that rings a bell, though I don't have any idea where. Perhaps its similar in a way to being more accustomed to the area. Like when Europeans came to this country, they wiped out so many Native AMericans with European diseases because the natives had no resistance. Not that I would WANT a resistance to pollutants, that can't be good. But there might be people out there who just don't HAVE respiratory problems because they are accustomed to their surroundings. Like the people who work at the plants...how do they react?

I worked on a ship for two months once and I never had a problem with diesel fumes when we were running on diesel. (It was primarily a steamship, so that wasn't going to do much there...) But there were some people aboard who did have trouble. Now I wasn't raised on a ship, but I was in the engine room most of the time so I may have become accustomed to what was down there. The deckies on the otherhand, they might not have been. Or perhaps it's not what is going on at the source, but what comes out the stack. Could be the same for cement plants...

All right, enough of the tangent already!

Ned, yes, most definitely in agreement that people's health should be foremost. But we are back to what to do about it. And that is, in my opinion, not to build new plants but to modernize and bring these outdated facilities up to environmental codes. In essence, ungrandfather them. SLC especially, having been ready to drop so much on the table for the Greenport project, should be able to drop something into Catskill.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Gwen - they pledged to do this...


Author:
Ned Depew
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:41:46 12/25/05 Sun

...after their Greenport plan bit the dust.

Have they done anything? Do they plan to do anything? call them and find out - then follow up and see if they actually keep their word. Their track record for keeping their promises around the country (and the world) isn't that good - one thing that worried "opponents" of the Greenport proposal.
[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: You are both right.


Author:
Ned Depew
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:58:42 12/22/05 Thu

It's true that we can't pin-point any specific chemical pollutant as being the "cause" of asthma. Yet we find the sharpest increase in asthma cases in areas where the air is most heavily polluted. So there is a direct, statistical correlation on a large scale between air pollution and asthma. Yet there are anomalies - places where the air is heavily polluted, but asthma has not risen to the same degree.

But there are also some clearly established facts. For instance, we now know unequivocally that even small rises - 10% - in the concentation of the smallest particulate pollution - PM2.5 - even for short durations of an hour or so - leads to increased admissions to hospitals for respiratory distress, including acute asthma attacks. So we know that PM2.5 is a trigger for asthma.

What we can conclude, in spite of our specific ignorance, is that more pollutants in our air have a negative effect on our health - including the frequency and severity of asthma attacks. Less pollution is better for us. Its what Tom would call (I would hope) "common sense."

Therefore, whatever can be done to reduce pollution is in our best interests. Certainly there is going to be a point where benefits and costs have to be weighed - but in general I hope we would all agree that protecting the health of our friends, neighbors and family should be the foremost goal, and that reducing pollution - not increasing it at all, even slightly (let alone with some of the most toxic chemicals known to man, like Dioxins) - is essential.



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.