Butterworth's Mis-statement -- Columbia County Talk

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: Butterworth's Mis-statement

Author:
Ned Depew

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11:39:20 09/08/05 Thu

Apparently Butterworth was "mis-informed" (shades of W.!) when he claimed that the DOS didn't want to go foreward on the LWRP until the appeal period for SLC had expired - since the appeal expired months ago, in May.

Where he got this incorrect information and why he relayed it to the public is a question we should all pursue.

Is this representative of the general level of accuracy of statements made to the public by the well-paid public officials in this Admininstration in their official capacity?

Honest mistake, or attempt to decieve the public in regard to the Waterfront Committee's lack of accomplishment? Let's find out.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]