| Subject: So Tom is saying,... |
Author:
Ned Depew
| [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 14:32:01 08/06/05 Sat
In reply to:
Gene
's message, "It can't be any clearer....." on 09:26:26 08/06/05 Sat
"I went to a school board meeting and I talked" - that much I got. What's all the rest about?
What "remarks" is Tom refering to? What did he say? Did he have a point to make? Did he make any sense? Is that clear to you?
Is Tom implying that there is a connection between a reporter being fired and his remarks - or the HCSD BOE meeting? Or is this just another non sequitur? If he believes there is a connection, why not share that with us, and give us some reason for his belief? Is that clear to you?
Is there any connection between some reporter being denied unemployment benefits by the R.-S. and any other subject that Tom has referred to, or is this just another pointless non sequitur? Is that clear to you?
Is there any connection between any of these subjects and "the latest on the refusal to make improvements on the bridge that posed a threat on all those who use it?" Does this have anything to do with the BOE? The HCSD? The Register-Star reporter not receiving unemployment? Anything? Is that clear to you?
"Strike "2'is on Londa's Board having been deleted on your Board," I think is a reference to Tom having cross-posted a piece of nonsense that I deleted here, that I then told him was "Strike Two" towards his being banned form this board. This makes sense! Is it a mistake? Is that clear to you?
"Seems we have our curtain rod annonimous posters who know how to critisize but have yet to offer Positive alternatives.here on your board,Londa's or at the public meetings."
This seems to be a reference to some silly/joke post about a messy divorce and curtain rods that Tom pulled off the internet and posted all over the place, that I also deleted. But who or what are "curtain rod annonimous posters?" Is that clear to you?
And is Tom just plain stupid, or is he willfully ignorant of all the "alternatives" to the gargantuan, badly-planned, mightily-polluting SLC proposal that have been presented? Is that clear to you?
There is an entire "smart-growth" strategy for economic development that is already being implemented in Hudson and Columbia County - where property values and tax bases have grown far more than they would have from the drop-in-the-bucket represented by the SLC proposal. Small businesses - the backbone of the American economy have been growing quickly, in spite of a complete lack of attention and encouragement from our County and City officials and their pet Alphabet agencies, which have been used far more to reward cronies than to help any citizens. IUs Tom purposly ignorant of all these efforts? Is that clear to you?
FoH, on the other hand, has proposed a whole agenda of smart growth strategies, many of which individuals and local groups are implementing on their own, since they can get no help from those who are only interested in "developing" what profits them and and their cronies, and what they can keep under their thumb. Has Tom failed to even examine the "alternative" proposals and issues raised at the open FoH sponsored Community meeting at CGCC on June 18th? Or is he just too blind to care? Is that clear to you?
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] |
|
Feedback: 