VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:32:36 10/10/03 Fri
Author: Pat Bundrock
Subject: Re: Saskatchewan Election
In reply to: Peter Ryan 's message, "Saskatchewan Election" on 12:58:50 10/09/03 Thu

I love you too PEte, from the U of S days.

>Saskatchewan Election Primer: NDP on the Defensive
>
>October 21st 1991 saw the ascension of Saskatchewan’s
>NDP under the tutelage of Roy Romanow, from the tired
>Tory administration of Grant Devine, in what proved to
>be one of the province’s most dynamic election
>campaigns. For eight years, the PC government had run
>the fiscal cupboard bare, and with a well orchestrated
>campaign from the get-go led by perhaps the most able
>politician in Saskatchewan history, the folksy Devine
>and his minions were swept from power.
>
>Fast forward twelve years.
>
>Current NDP premier, Lorne Calvert calls a provincial
>election for November 5th, 2003. Calvert, no matter
>how integral, has led Saskatchewan into a deficit
>position, and by all accounts, has badly managed the
>provincial crown corporations, providing ample fodder
>for the opposition Saskatchewan Party and Liberals.
>This election should have the makings of a 1991
>Romanowesque rout. But,not quite….
>
>Leadership played a huge role in Romanow’s initial
>win. Positioning the telegenic, self-assured, and
>suave NDP leader in front of the television cameras
>provided the NDP with a star quality that complimented
>its slick and savvy media campaign. A player on the
>national scene from the 1982 constitutional
>negotiations, Romanow’s confidence shattered the shaky
>PC campaign, by promising economic integrity and no
>ideological shift toward socialism.
>
>Contrast the NDP winning formula with that of the
>current front running Saskatchewan Party, whose leader
>Elwin Hermanson has done little to galvanize support
>in Saskatoon and Regina. Hermanson, a defeated Reform
>Party MP from Preston Manning’s inner circle, is at
>best a mediocre debater, and has done little to secure
>the much needed support of middle-of-the-road voters
>in urban Saskatchewan. As well, while Calvert has
>little credibility with voters from a fiscal
>management standpoint, he is viewed by a vast majority
>of those recently polled as more trustworthy than the
>lacklustre Sask. Party leader. Should personality
>become an issue in this election, the NDP could soon
>find themselves on the offensive.
>
>However, that scenario is unlikely, given Calvert’s
>move to make crown corporation public ownership the
>main focus of his campaign, a tact attempted by NDP
>premier Alan Blakeney in 1982, which failed miserably.
> It should also be noted that the Saskatchewan Party’s
>Grow Saskatchewan policy of increasing the population
>by 100,000 over ten years by slashing taxes has
>bombed. As well, recent statements by Sask. Party
>officials that their ability to cut taxes should they
>form government be limited, as well as revelations of
>a ’Hit List’ of civil servants with NDP affiliations
>smacks of amateur hour. Recent reports of Preston
>Manning being enlisted to help in the transition to
>government in an office largely controlled by tired
>Devine hacks and ex Reform Ottawa staffers will do
>little to aid Hermanson, either.
>
>Both parties are also limited in their candidate
>stock, as well. The NDP has all but lost its stellar
>line up of cabinet ministers, with the exception of
>the innovative and intelligent Eric Cline. The Sask.
>Party, while certainly boasting some excellent
>candidates, have also exercised poor judgement by
>allowing the nominations of ex-motorcycle gang member
>Jim McCallister, and former aide to Independent
>controversial MP Jim Pankiw, Patrick Bundrock.
>
>The wild card in this year’s vote will be the moribund
>Liberals. Having had several leaders since the ouster
>of Lynda Haverstock in 1995, the traditional third
>party has been largely discredited, despite the
>attempts of young leader David Karwacki. However,
>should the Sask. Party campaign falter, the
>possibility for the Grits to hold on to its few
>ridings from the last election could be in the cards.
>
>Will the NDP be defeated by the Sask. Party?
>Conventional wisdom says yes. However, given the poor
>state of leadership, candidates, and campaign planning
>relating to both parties, expect no landslides.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • Re: Saskatchewan Election -- merv, 19:38:45 10/18/03 Sat
    Post a message:
    This forum requires an account to post.
    [ Create Account ]
    [ Login ]
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.