Re: Ridings to watch- poll -- Sask. Ridings To Watch

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:30:10 10/28/03 Tue
Author: Poulard
Subject: Re: Ridings to watch- poll
In reply to: Redman 's message, "Re: Ridings to watch- poll" on 11:56:43 10/27/03 Mon

I think that the New Green Alliance should have been higher, as more rural residents in Meadow Lake are lookng for a safer environment.

> make one of those seats an independent for
>>Scmidt in Melville-Saltcoats most likely.
>>
>>were up by 5-10 points -- before yesterday's poll
>>showing them narrowly (within the margin of error)
>>behind.
>>
>>
>That poll was interesting wasn't it? An acquaintance
>was polled(rural sask) and he commented that the "who
>would you vote for question" was unique because it was
>the only open end one on the poll. He thought that
>could be the reason for the low undecided level and
>poor showing for the other than NDP or SP. His
>reasoning, if faced with the bare question without any
>"suggested answers" people would mention the party
>names most familiar.
>
>Maybe the pollsters are on to something or maybe it
>was an oversight -but this poll has been giving
>different answers than people expected.
>
>By November 6, we should know which was which.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Ridings to watch- poll -- 20yr_old_rightwing, 02:18:45 11/04/03 Tue