Re: another GHMB AOM -- The MB of Ian Alex Blease

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sat, May 16 2026, 11:06:21 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:53:09 04/05/08 Sat
Author: warwick
Author Host/IP: px3cv.gv.shawcable.net / 24.64.223.205
Subject: Re: another GHMB AOM
In reply to: Steve 's message, "Re: another GHMB AOM" on 13:06:09 04/04/08 Fri

"Why you keep claiming it's been dismissed out of hand is beyond me. Since it was two geologists that have looked at it and stated, unequivocally, that it does has some effect, however, it is not the major contributer to the severe erosion we see today."

TWO geologists say it was a minor contributor, there are definite grounds for stating that it was A contributor. as was rain, runoff, percolation sand abrasion etc etc.

But for Jawest, referring to himself as WE, to dismiss myself or Archae or anyone as completely biased, politically corrupt,uneducated, morons for merely not wanting to have it thrown out ...AND for him to speak FOR Schoch who never actually seems to speak for himself...is just plain wrong unproffessional and appalling.

I've told you many mnay times that I have yet to throw out much at all when it comes to Giza. I see no reason to do so posthaste now.

I've also NEVER heard any of teh supporters of a recarve attempt to deal with the logistics that such would have entailed....Including yourself. Speaking of Yourself...rremind me again just what substantive contribution you've ever made to any of these TOPICS

All I've evfer seen is a guy who came to Ma'at Spouting that noone there knew how to moderate a message board. A guy who had a lot of wrong impressions of what the current Egyptological postion on many of teh issues we discuss was. A guy who became so deteermined to demonstate to "All those arrogant people with education" that he too cvould be a player. so he found a side and stuck with it.

he attached himself to Schoch (hence Jaws)like a Remora, and has NOT budged a micromete in any postiion since. despite having been benefit of the acumulated research of any number of people from any number of diciplines, from any number of persoanl backgrounds

so who the hell are you to be able to state that the drum has been beaten to death???

and who is Martin Ede to question the validity of an argument because of the identity and or persuasion of same?

Have you read his notions re Freemasonry and Egyptian History??? Do you not see that he is as biased as He claims Hawass to be.

You're Nothing but a knee jerk conservative who suspects that all academics are really raving liberal lunatics

You're an idiot Steve,, as much as it pains and embarasses me to stoop to the level of name caming.

Warwick

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

and please -- Warwick, 11:26:13 04/05/08 Sat