Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Friday, May 16, 05:09:36am

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

Subject: ... Author: Paul [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 17:39:32 01/15/04 Thu "This board is NOT in rebellion to Roy taking the other down" I agree with that Sunny, no matter how much certain people may try to splice Roy's comments to mean - "I say those new message board people are BAD". I am surew that is not what he said, it is their re-interpretation of it. Had this board been filled with "Roy is a bad guy" anti-FHU propaganda then OK, but it isn't.... Personally I have no objection to Roy taking down the FHU board and chat room as the FHU has some potential liability when twisters and warpers of the truth go on there in order to discourage others from seeking God (by posing as "true believers" while posting inflammatory or provocative alternative messages, propaganda and so on). As for the accusations of bickering (not Roy's well-founded and justified comments but those of "second-handers" to whom ANY speaking up means "bickering"), I know what my intention / motivation was when I posted -and it was not to bicker, it was simply to set the record straight. I was not angry when I wrote it and I'm not angry now, despite the innuendo : and I am sure most other people here are the same way. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]