[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sunday, May 31, 16:39:41Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 02:46:19 08/12/04 Thu
Author: Asia Pacific
Subject: Cook Is initial comment on draft media bill


kia ora na pmw,

please find attached copies of new draft legislation. some initial comments:

1. journalists in new zealand and australia have warned strongly against giving any kind of legislative powers over the news media.
2. government has previously tried to censor freedoms of speech, first with the 1995 media standards bill, which was dropped after a public petition, and a 1996 constitutional amendment to remove high court protections from permanent residents, also withdrawn (after pressure from the country's largest aid donor, new zealand).
3. government's track record of enforcement of existing laws is poor. for example, in december 2002, the director of environment services said there had only been three prosecutions in ten years. over the same time, the ministry of health, for another example, has not tabled an annual report with parliament, nor has it till today.
4. government's track record of consultation is good, but accountability poor. for example, the 1998 political review commission surveyed the public widely, but few of the good governance provisions, including a code of conduct, have been implemented. an environmental bill still contains provisions that have attracted wide opposition.

overall, government however should be commended for releasing the draft legislation for public comment. this is a process that should be followed for all legislation.

more soon, thanks

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.