Re: 皇帝唔急太監急 -- SFXC forum 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Mon, May 18 2026, 1:56:15

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Re: 皇帝唔急太監急

Author:
一個中四的學生

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:27:04 05/02/04 Sun
In reply to: 吉 's message, "Re: 皇帝唔急太監急" on 23:42:44 05/01/04 Sat

>公仔佬提出的是一個牽連甚廣的問題,很難三言兩語說得清.
>
>或者先由批評陳老師的事件說起,再看看能否將此事的結論一般
>化.
>
>"一個中四的學生"對陳憲華老師的留言不是野蠻的唾罵,而是有
>理據的批評.我不認識陳老師,但就著同學對他的批評,我有以下
>疑問:
>1."一個中四的學生"的證據是否屬實?
>同學有正式向學校投訴嗎? 學校有進行調查嗎?
>2.如屬實,陳老師的行為或態度是一個中學老師應有的嗎?
>是不是同學對老師的期望和學校對老師的期望出現了分歧?
>3.如那是不應有的行為,同學、陳老師和學校有想辦法解決嗎?
>同學們是否認為只有趕走陳老師,問題才會解決?
>學校是否認為問題必定出自學生,所以應繼續放任陳老師?
>有人願意放下成見,尋求大家都接納的方案嗎?
首先多謝閣下既回應..我先答左閣下既問題先~
1.我提出既証據係我親身所經歷既~而我亦有曾向老師反映,但由於話題敏感,所以老師都不便有太多意見~不過最有行動既都係梁穎琛~舊年佢聽左我地幾個同學既意見之後,決定以代班主任既身份係每堂FT解答我地既phy問題(上年3a既同學應該知)
2.上年我問佢問題時,佢話:<你睇左呢份notes先啦~呢份notes講得好清楚啦...佢睇好先黎問我啦.....>但係問題係我對份notes所講既野根本就唔識,我睇多1000次都係唔識啦...佢係有心答既就唔會作出如此莫名其妙既答覆.....而佢既態度問題閣下可以隨便抽樣問問上年俾佢教過phy既人,我敢講句,10個有10個都會話佢係<差>!!
3.唉~如果學校係會郁佢既話,就唔會俾今年f3既chem佢教啦....真係誤人子弟~~我初初以為係我出左問題,但問番有聽書既同學都話佢係教唔明...+上態度奇差~!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]