I understand the AFL has to approve trades - is that correct? -- SUPER-LEAGUE BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

6/05/26 7:36:09pm [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8], 9 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 8/12/05 8:58:33am
Author: Walt
Subject: I understand the AFL has to approve trades - is that correct?
In reply to: SL 's message, "Concerns about unfair trading, moderators please read.........." on 7/12/05 4:26:05pm

So I can see nothing wrong with having all trades viewed first for approval and if anything fishy is going on coaches could be asked to explain. Its conceivable I could arrange a new coach to take over a team and then do some one sided trades - so maybe a safegaurd now would be wise.

As for RBs trade, good work on his part and I agree with others that perahps we're over rating Didak. Some would say he (RB) got the wrong end of it, particualr non-Collingwood supporters. In this comp you have to look at point scoring which is a little different from an AFL team. I had medhurst, a good goal sneak / small forward - an asset to an AFL team, but in the end traded him because I'm sick of him getting scores of 30-40, a lesse r version of Didak perhaps (in the end I got Glass who averages about the same). Don't know Didaks average score, potentially a high scoring midfielder but RBs taken a risk and certainly not a one-sided trade in the context of the SL.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> All good, just thought I would bring it up. Us mods will keep a keen eye, end of story -- D9, 8/12/05 9:01:55pm [1]

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[ Edit | View ]