VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:04:40 05/31/04 Mon
Author: Dimmes
Subject: £10,000 fine for on-line adult service

£10,000 fine for on-line adult service
28/05/2004

The UK watchdog for premium rate phone numbers has fined an internet sex company £10,000 for using software that installed a default dial-up number on users’ computers that called a premium rate number without the consent or knowledge of users.

To compound matters, according to the Independent Commission for the Supervision of Standards of Telephone Information Services (ICSTIS), the calls did not terminate automatically when costs reached £20 – as they are supposed to under the ICSTIS Code of Practice – resulting in massive telephone bills.

PB Communications SR, the company at the centre of the complaint, denied that its dialler software could install itself on users’ computers without consent or that calls could be made without approval. The company explained, according to ICSTIS, “that calls could only be made if users agreed to a disclaimer, set a PIN code and accepted the cost of the calls.”

The company did accept that it had had a problem with the automatic termination due, it said, to a fault in the operating system, and agreed to refund customers with calls in excess of £20.

ICSTIS fined the company £10,000 and barred access to the service for six months.

The fine is a lot less than the £75,000 fine imposed on New York company BW Telecom in February, which was found guilty of sending spam e-mails that encouraged users unwittingly to connect to a premium rate dial-up service

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.