Re: �� -- Canada

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]

Subject: Re: ��

Author:
rrr

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:03:28 05/23/01 Wed
In reply to: Svetlana 's message, "Re: �� " on 11:25:37 03/24/01 Sat

>incorrect info about full recognition

I did not say 'fully' recognized, did I? Neither did I say that any of the Canadian institutions kindly referred by you to would 'recognize' it. Should they at all? The point of the message is that many EMPLOYERS recognize it and that's what we were talking about.

>The second wrong...

Sure, to get admitted to the exams you need only to be a registered student. But to get a registered student... you need to have the two recommendations. While admitting certain degree of inaccuracy in the wording of my post I would still like to draw your attention to the fact that if you keep to the sunbstance over form rule you would have avoided such a confusion. I mean that to see a sentence as a mere sum of words, rather than an integral message with certaing idea behind it is quite embarassing for a Certified Accountant.

Regards,
Another Chartered Accountant

>Dear rrr!
>
>Why you gave incorrect info about full recognition of
>ACCA in Canada? Please visit sites of professional
>accounting bodies of Canada: CGA, CMA and CA to find
>out how they recognize the ACCA qualification.
>The second wrong item is "In addition to it you should
>have two recommendations from existing ACCA members in
>order to get admitted to the exams". In order to take
>an exam you don't need anything except being a student
>of ACCA. I am so sure because I am certified
>accountant of ACCA.
>
>Dear all! If you need any info about ACCA plese visit
>site http:/www.accaglobal.com

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]