VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:03:40 10/05/04 Tue
Author: bravo!
Author Host/IP: 172.192.109.54
Subject: parasite
In reply to: by definition 's message, "Parasite" on 10:37:49 10/04/04 Mon

I laughed so hard I kicked my computer plug out of the wall.

You forgot to mention that it is a rambling, non sequitorial piece of pompous pedagoguery, though :-)

relax, I think he teaches little gradeschoolers ...


>It appears that it is YOU who are the parasite, by
>definition.
>
>Parasite (n.)
>a follower who hangs around a host (without benefit to
>the host).
>
>Argue with that, you pathetic, incompetent.
>
>Plus, learn to use proper punctuation, please. Your
>posts are seriously flirting with illegibility because
>they are not properly punctuated.
>
>And your spelling is atrocious.
>
>
>>Dear Chief Lit-Pimp:
>>
>>Regardless of a degree in philosophy, you don't know
>>what an argument is, nor really what the mind-body
>>problem implies. Read it again, slowly. Perhaps you
>>find logic itself objectionable. Anyways, I doubt you
>>grasp the points raised. Also, having read some of
>>your sentimental juvenile attempts at "beat
>>literature" I know that my vocabulary and syntax
>>skills far surpass your cheesy, Dylanesque
>minstrelsy.
>>
>>I suggest you avoid any real philosophical debate and
>>stick to the usual LitKicks agenda of misconstruing
>>(and pimpin,' of course) famous writers. Lets see, ya
>>started with beats, now on to Sartre and Camus,
>>featured at the Asher Donut Shop...
>>
>>Obviously, you're pathetically incompetent to assess
>>literature or philosophy: the racists are you and your
>>crew of cheap broads
>>
>>phuck off, parasite

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.