VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234567[8]9 ]
Subject: 對"教義異端說"很好的反駁!


Author:
Liberal
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:32:02 07/28/04 Wed
In reply to: AIKE 's message, "Re: Heresies are not bad!" on 21:16:11 07/27/04 Tue

楊慶球教授的說法是很典型的保守派對異端的定義.其好處是簡單清晰,只要拿"使徒信經"出來對照,便可輕易把任何教派界定為正統或異端.

我稱這種對異端的定義方法為"教義異端說".

你的回應很好,清楚地指出"教義異端說"的核心問題:

"純粹以教義一字定音,空談理論,硬套現實處境。"

"教義異端說"的另一個問題是握殺了對教義思考的空間.因為思考可能包括一個懷疑的過程.而懷疑教義在"教義異端說"之下便要冒著被指為挑戰正統,即可能走向異端,的危險.

我以後可以簡單地回答來自"教義異端說"的指控了:

"純粹以教義一字定音,空談理論,漠視某群體的現實現象。"

多謝.

應該可以被收錄於"超短基版FAQ" (vscfaq.hkudb.com).

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.