VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:08:18 02/12/05 Sat
Author: Tony Lang
Subject: Re: camilla came in later than Diana ?
In reply to: ts 's message, "camilla came in later than Diana ?" on 20:21:11 02/10/05 Thu

>No ts I dont think Camilla did come in later than Diana.
Charles was having it off with her before Diana appeared.
Diana's job was to provide an heir and a spare, which she did. After that she was surplus to requirements.
Oh we do love our royal family (spelled with a small r)
Todays headlines in The Daily Star, Britains most popular tabloid newspaper read.
Two Silly Old Gits To Get Married. Who Cares?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.