Re: CK嚇死人 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 17:13:16, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8 ]

Subject: Re: CK嚇死人

Author:
身在澳洲的人

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:55:55 11/13/04 Sat
In reply to: 忍者小靈精 's message, "CK嚇死人" on 00:19:38 11/10/04 Wed

老師嚴，你地又話佢惡，話佢無理取鬧。
老師善，你地又話佢廢，話佢唔識教書。

我想問下何謂好老師呢？

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: CK嚇死人

Author:
身在香港的怨憤之鬼
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:00:05 11/14/04 Sun

>老師嚴，你地又話佢惡，話佢無理取鬧。
>老師善，你地又話佢廢，話佢唔識教書。
>
>我想問下何謂好老師呢？

咁即係你覺得老師嚴or老師善係好事啦
首先,嚴同無理取鬧係兩回事
ck係幾嚴架.正如我所講,佢要求所有人靜晒先開始教書,而且一噪就鬧
但係你真係覺得咁係好?唔俾有任何討論,一鬧就鬧五至十分鐘,嚴重拖慢進度
而我所講既無理取鬧係佢既野蠻
有幾次,我班中某同學正處理班務及正在點名
ck竟然覺得阻住佢教書,要求我個同學坐返埋位
我個同學同佢解釋,ck就大聲鬧佢
我想話處理下班務同點下名咪最多三分鐘,使唔使鬧呀?

同樣,善同唔識教書係兩樣風馬牛不相及既野,點可以拉埋黎講?
關於善,乜ck有"善"過咩...?
唔識教書有好多例子,除便拿一個黎講都得
我覺得佢睇野太表面,教中化既時候淨係識印notes,解釋下d名詞
但係佢有d字既解釋又好鬼似,睇唔出有咩分別(政治果課)
就算俾佢解釋都好好又點?文化篇章大抵唔需要你識晒課書既內容
係要你分識條文題,而我並不覺得佢d分識有咩咁獨到囉...

孔子講過"過猶不及"我認為太嚴太鬆都係唔好既,要係中間找出平衡
至於平衡點定,可以上黎九濟堂廣開聖聽,自會有答案

唔知我答唔答到你既問題?

[> [> [> Subject: Re: CK嚇死人

Author:
身在澳洲的人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:17:59 11/14/04 Sun

第一，我無講個話老師嚴或者善係好事。
我咁講的目的只係想大家諗下點解要經常批評老師。

第二，每一個老師都有佢自己的教學方法同佢的底線，佢要求所有學生靜晒先教書，佢有佢的道理。其他老師無咁的要求，唔代表佢地唔想，有邊個老師唔想學生靜靜地聽佢教？如果你係佢講緊書的時候同其他人討論，你基本上係無咩可能聽都得晒佢所講的野。你一定會MISS左幾個POINTS！（呢個係我讀COMMUNICATION個LECTURER講的。）你話佢鬧人拖慢進度，或許是真的。我覺得應該將全班或一些人留係度，用小息或者放學的時間作訓導，這樣你會不會覺得好一點？
此外，我唔覺得上堂處理班務及點名係好合理的事，你有FORM TEACHER可以作點名，小息或轉堂可處理班務。我相信老師肯上堂俾你處理班務係寬弘，唔俾係合理。

第三，我覺得CK絕對唔係一個唔識教書的人。你所講的中化，講真，以我所知，係一科唔係話容易明的科。唔係話讀下書就會識晒的科。每個人的諗法都有唔同，解釋當然會有分岐。好多時候都接受到不同的見解。你唔覺得佢分析得獨到，你其實可以去圖書館搜尋下資料，搵到更好的應該向同學分享一下，唔係坐係到彈劾老師的錯。

你懂得講"平衡"，咁你點解又唔諗下CK的好野黎將佢的唔好平衡？