Re: 大家覺得濟?仲似唔似band 1學校 -- 蕾绑

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 1:30:27, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, [7], 8 ]

Subject: Re: 大家覺得濟?仲似唔似band 1學校

Author:
[偽]4e某

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09:45:32 10/02/04 Sat
In reply to: old student 's message, "Re: 大家覺得濟?仲似唔似band 1學校" on 21:30:53 10/01/04 Fri

如學生盡了己責,又怎會被老師拖累?

吾好像在上文已經提及了

[如果所有老師只做你所謂的"份內事", 社會會變成點?]

世上沒有如果,事實放在眼前,不是所有老師都是這樣,

因為人人性格和想法都不同.

吾所定的最低責任只是一種看法,就像閣下看人只有高低一樣.

>>>我相信, 老?每月收取萬多元人工(年資高的更不只), ?任不單單是你所謂你的完成課程, 而你所謂的最低?任, 只是你把某些老?教學求奇合理化吧了

即是若果工資少的老師便可教學求奇?老師的付出要因應工資而定?

關於閣下提及的考試比喻,能考上的未必一定好,

就像吾一般,考上了,卻[扶車邊],即吾也是一個普通的人.

吾實在不明白,做了份內事的老師為何會是不好?

程頤曰之:
[不偏之謂中，不易之謂庸。中者天下之正道，庸者天下之定理]

子曰:[君子依乎中庸，遁世不見知而不悔]

就是不明閣下把中庸之人否決之理

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 大家覺得濟?仲似唔似band 1學校

Author:
old student
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:33:46 10/02/04 Sat

首先, 你在post中不斷指我看人只有高低, 容不下中庸的人, 但我從來未表達過我有這種思想, 我只是說現實社會汰弱留強吧了

然而, 我不認同你所說的"學生已盡己責, 又怎會被老師拖累"這種想法, 從你之前的文章中, 你也提及過人有高, 中庸和低這種概念, 那比好的老師教總比"中庸"的老師教的好, 人望高處, 誰不想比好老師教, 有時遇到你所謂"中庸"的老師, 連批評一, 兩句也不可以嗎? 如果我們能容下"中庸"的老師, 那又有誰容下我們, 大學嗎? 大學不會容下成績中庸的學生, 這是現實, 而且容不容下是社會決定的, 不是我們個人可以決定, 但我相信我們有權利發表一下不滿的意見

最後, 你沒有回應我之前的問題-----"最低責任"是誰定, 又應如何介定?

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 大家覺得濟?仲似唔似band 1學校

Author:
[偽]4e某
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:51:03 10/02/04 Sat

中庸者,不只是高與低之間,而是在兩個極端之間,

就像閣下所謂的[有盡責]和[沒有盡責]一樣,不許有中間的存在

像閣下的想法,那麼若容得下我們,那又有誰容得下中庸的老師們?

只從自己的角度出法,會否自私了點兒?

此外吾亦沒有不允許閣下以及同學們的批評.

最後,我已經說過了[最低責任]等於[份內事]

那麼份內事是誰介定?不知道

就如責任是誰介定?不知道

又如勤力是誰介定?也不知道