馬屁精 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 1:30:26, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8] ]

Subject: 馬屁精

Author:
馬屁精

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:40:46 09/04/04 Sat
In reply to: 手非長 's message, "有幾點值得大家反思" on 03:24:29 09/04/04 Sat

"當然有馬屁精會說搞好50周年可以提高士氣和好好沖喜一下,一洗前科, 踏進新紀元.而且學校表現退步就可以唔重視50周年既咩. 但.........."
誰是馬屁精?你覺不覺得你侮辱左好多人?

"問心果句,試問現今是值得花大量時間人力慶祝,還是值得醒過來,急切地解救上面的問題呢?"
我知你從前好威,你從前的濟記更威,但你有建設性意見解救上面的問題嗎?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject:

Re: 批評的定義

Author:
手非長
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:01:47 09/04/04 Sat

對不起, 批評只是要求指出有什麼錯誤和不當所在. 這已是幫了很大的忙. 至於提出有建設性意見, 這可不是批評者的責任.

正如去酒店吃飯如果發現食品變壞或味道差. 請問食客是否要確保可以提出有建設性意見先可以出聲批評? 因為提出有建設性意見本是酒店管理層的責任. 而非食客.

中國人有關批評的常犯錯誤3 部曲:
1. 又唔好見您落手落腳幫手做?
2. 請問可否提出當中一些值得稱讚的項目?
3. 可否提出有建設性意見?

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 批評的定義
Author: 對不起 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 07:49:04 09/07/04 Tue 手非長觀點幼稚,言詞偏激,得罪人又唔肯認. 對不起, 我是一位批評者,我已指出他有什麼錯誤和不當所在.這已是幫了他很大的忙. 至於提出有建設性意見,這可不是批評者的責任.

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 批評的定義
Author: KK [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 14:57:15 09/07/04 Tue 同學, 甘又有o麥為呢...