VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:41:54 05/14/01 Mon
Author: 無極
Subject: 我自己對此既意見...(請睇內文)
In reply to: 信長 's message, "求証！！請大家幫幫手。" on 23:17:30 05/13/01 Sun

首先..光榮自己出既攻略..兩本野所講既條件唔同...
而日本各wp5綱站均沒有多提及配合理論..只有幾個日本綱站
有簡單介紹過血脈活性化(混在)之達成條件..均寫出父及母因子
細過或等如四,其他六個細過或等如八..
邊個先係真..真係好難講,呢個係光榮自己出左問題..
我自己認為血脈活性化係"父及母因子細過或等如四,其他六個細過或等如八"..但其實混在根本冇乜大效果..對質素(爆發力)冇乜大影響比心機配匹父/母活力源仲好..質素(爆發力)等等大幅加強..比起
(混在)效果好得多啦...
冇謂唗時間..
P.S.以下係小弟既小小意見

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.