VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:56:46 11/12/08 Wed
Author: Deep Diction
Subject: Re: redistribution of wealth
In reply to: fafa 's message, "Re: redistribution of wealth" on 20:50:51 11/12/08 Wed

>>
>>>McCain isn't the issue. He was a dinosaur 10 years
>ago
>>>and he's a fossil now. Obama's many associations with
>>>radicals, terrorists and terrorist apologists coupled
>>>with his mentors such as Alinsky, Farrakhan, Wright
>>>and a myriad of others, combined with his marked
>>>inexperience and short-sightedness when it comes to
>>>foreign affairs makes him dangerous.
>>
>>That statement, false as it is, has nothing whatsoever
>>to do with the issue we're discussing. This is a
>>discussion about taxes, and I'd like to hear somebody
>>explain why it's okay for McCain to propose ideas in
>>2001 that he calls redistributionist and socialist
>>when the other guy proposes them in 2008. In 2001 were
>>you speaking out against McCain's radical tax
>policies?
>
>False mein tuchus. Every word of that statement is
>pure fact. Sorry for discussing it in the wrong thread.

I suppose the fact that every country in the world (except Georgia, Laos, Lithuania and Cambodia) supports Obama by an average 3-to-1 ratio makes Obama the risky pick in terms of foreign policy.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/111253/World-Citizens-Prefer-Obama-McCain-More-Than-3to1.aspx

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.