VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]
Subject: Re: jolly ranchers


Author:
Deb
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:12:19 11/18/04 Thu
In reply to: mrsk 's message, "jolly ranchers" on 09:47:24 11/18/04 Thu
 >ok. I am lightening the mood a little for us all this
>morning. How bad are jolly ranchers and other little
>hard candies for us?

I don't think they're bad at all - they're quite tasty! ;-)

Jest kiddin' - 70 cals a serving which is 3 pieces (about 23 cals per. Zero fat, sodium and protein and only 11g sugars. The new blue rasberry flavor is the best. BTW, I'm reading this off my bag of jollys that are in my desk...that's how bad I think they are! :o)

Deb
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: jolly rancherschocolate10:25:04 11/18/04 Thu

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.