VoyForums

Hermosa Beach Florist
, Expressive Flowers has been Serving flowers nationwide since 1995.

VoyUser Login optional ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]34 ]


Free Speech is PARAMOUNT for a Free Nation
INTERNET MAGAZINE covering the speeches and actions of one "KING OF THE AMERICAS". est. 1998
Wine Making

Subject: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:34:35 09/12/03 Fri

Dear Bill:

I found this piece, supposedly written by you, on the web:

"It's The War, Stupid By: Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003"

*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the issues at hand. The following is a line by line dissection of your wrongness:

For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we are certainly a blas頢unch.

We're worried about how much fighting the people who want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit strategy" in Iraq.

*Well actually, We just want to know when we can declare we’ve 'won' the War. What has to happen so that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict? I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is, "What do we have to do to win?"

Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's first guessing the nation's foreign policy.

*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify YOU as a 'name caller'.

Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.

*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't be there at all.

There are around the world thousands of Islamic fanatics who want to kill Americans because they believe Allah is down with that.

*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals who preach hate and violence against someone or some group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?

These people are taught from the time they are children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of life on this planet.

*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read, learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are those who would paint the “America” in a bad light, suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching people wrong things a bad thing?

There is no negotiation with the most of these zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.

*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do, or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar, after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again, you cut his hand off and make stew out of it. Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar. AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade desire...

They want blood and they will use any and all means to get it.

*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood. And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.

A number of nations help these killers and allow the murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue generation after generation.

Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar, its ambassador to the United States.

*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'? And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your depiction, of “generational indoctrination”? MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are taught hate toward America, and oppression toward women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein. Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his fighting for the rights of the common people, and in so much receives much support from the common people in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report, you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???

Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the USA however he could.

*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an ‘imminent threat’ today, now is it?

The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a state of their own, the propaganda machine that demonizes Israel and America will roll along unchallenged in the Arab world.

*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand your complete line of thought there...

So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace agreement that both sides can live with.

*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even if we succeed in doing so there will still be anti-American sentiments alive and well.

In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully, it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq helps that effort.

*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T. Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?

Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran and Syria.

*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only manage a danger gas station.

A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.

*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because they have evidence in their very country that we are not only invaders, but occupiers.

Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist operations before they hurt we the people.

*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will to give their life for a cause if they are properly motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an attack.

This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing America in Iraq is something Aesop would have published.

*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed. “…rescuing…” is EXACTLY what we need.

The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.

*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S., in regards to the needs of other nations, also? Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber. Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in Ireland?

Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not when American lives are at stake.

*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10 years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000 innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't THOSE lives "at stake"???

In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is far from a perfect world.

*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with. However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.

The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to aggressively help America neutralize terror states is an outrage of historic proportions. France is the worst.

*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong, but you think you are right, what does that make you? I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are against you, what makes you think you are right??? "...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?

The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.

*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to anyone anywhere.

Then France actively undermined both the war and the occupation. President Bush should level with the American people about the duplicity of France and, to a lesser extent, Germany.

*So you want our leaders to actively work to further separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't move.

I know this would cause an uproar by what the French have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.

*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock people up in this country for smoking cannabis as medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country. When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is conscionable.

At the same time, the Bush administration must begin earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the world, we want to make it safe for everyone.

*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to use our military to unbalance the free market, by aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really global domination, but rather global market manipulation.

Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.

*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the causalities.

The Bush administration has the correct global view regarding terrorism but poor communications skills both within the country and abroad.

*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean they LIE, and hide their real agendas?

The sad truth is that most people don't even know that World War III is underway and have little understanding of the strategies and stakes.

*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their 'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is that although we are the free-est nation in the world, we are also the most ignorant and uninformed. Americans don't see the world outside of their immediate environment, and have little to no concept of the international world or market. Look, I am a well-informed, partially educated, fully informed, Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write whatever we want. The only people who can take away these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they can’t do so with our authority and approval.

But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.

*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be cautious of.

And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit strategy."

It's us or them.

*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home, I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you. Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.

---

THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I have written scores of letters and e-mails to you, asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2 years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in response to what must be a mounded pile of paper outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward, and God help your mindless minions.

King,
North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: John Kerry


Author:
Michael Gardner
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:42:20 10/28/04 Thu

>Bill; A friend sent this to me, I thought you would be interested in reading this.
>
>Ok I didn't believe this, so I went to the web site why does this not
> > surprise me but it was true.
> > WOW!! GUESS WHO'S ENDORSING JOHN KERRY!!!!!
> > The Communist Party of The United States of America, CPUSA, is publicly
> > supporting the election of John Kerry!
> > No, this is not a typo...you read it correctly. The CPUSA has made
> > available on its Web site, http://www.cpusa.org/, an advertisement
> > entitled Top Ten Reasons To Defeat Bush. This advertisement can be
> > downloaded.
> > The communist party urges readers to place this ad in local newspapers
> > throughout the country to defeat President Bush.
> > Remarkably, the "Top Ten Reasons" of the Communist party are identical
> > to those of the Democratic party; out-sourcing, homosexual rights,
abortion
> > and the like.
> > At first, it was thought that "this was only a coincidence." The
> > Democratic party of the United States couldn't be in lock step with the
> > Marxists!
> > So, the originator of this email wrote to a spokesman of the CPUSA in
> > Georgia and here is part of the spokesman's letter: "The CPUSA supports
> > the John Kerry campaign with donations and volunteer effort. We believe
> > that defeating George Bush is the single most important issue this
> > November"
> > **Next, it was discovered that one of Kerry's campaign themes is "Let
> > America be America Again." This slogan was borrowed from a Communist
> > poet, Langston Hughes. This is not common knowledge to the average
> > American. "Let America be America Again" sounds good but is a rambling,
> > gloomy poem.
> > Interestingly, another poem by Langston goes as follows; "Goodbye,
> > Christ Jesus, Lord, God, Jehovah, Beat it on away from here now. Make
> > way for a new guy with no religion at all -- A real guy named Marx,
communist,
> > Lenin, Peasant, Stalin, Worker, ME -- I said, ME!"
> > Then, if this was not convincing enough that the Democratic party has
> > lost it, a third discovery!
> > **A Vietnam vet group took a trip to Communist Hanoi to investigate a
> > report that John Kerry was in the "Hanoi Hall of Fame." Yes, there is a
museum
> > in Hanoi with a section dedicated to foreign activists who help defeat
the
> > United States Military in Vietnam. Of course, you would expect Jane
> > Fonda's picture to be there. But, alas, there is John Kerry's picture
> > shaking the hand of a communist official.
> > Never has there been such a tragedy! Never has there been such a threat
> > to America! Has the Democratic party has been taken over by the far, far
> > left?
> > It's not only the communists but the homosexual activists who are
> > appalled that George Bush is married to a woman! They are enraged that
> > the President wants a constitutional amendment to protect traditional
> > marriage between a man and woman.
> > Then we have the ACLU running to a federal activist judge with every
> > piece of legislation that doesn't fit into their leftist agenda. They
> > support every Democratic socialist whim. The removal of the Ten
> > Commandments is their top priority!
> > Don't trust this message for the truth -- visit the CPUSA website at
> > http://www.cpusa.org/ -- read the articles, and then decide for
> > yourself.
> > So...who will you vote for during the next Presidential Election?




>:
>



>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Samuel Bennin
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:39:02 04/25/05 Mon

>Dear Bill: I am 12 years old.I'm into paintballing but my parents wont let buy a better gun. The gun i wanted cost 100 dollars.But i have got 312 dollars i earned from me working alot.Anyways I really want this gun and I argued with my dad and now he wont even answer any question i ask about getting a better gun.What do you think i should do.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: knowing what to do about parents


Author:
Samuel Bennin
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:40:15 04/25/05 Mon

>>Dear Bill: I am 12 years old.I'm into paintballing
>but my parents wont let buy a better gun. The gun i
>wanted cost 100 dollars.But i have got 312 dollars i
>earned from me working alot.Anyways I really want this
>gun and I argued with my dad and now he wont even
>answer any question i ask about getting a better
>gun.What do you think i should do.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:17:36 02/07/06 Tue



To: The Twelve year old kid:
By a sling shot! its cheeper.
Sin Seer Really
Danny D.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Gene
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:45:53 10/02/07 Tue

>
>
> To: The Twelve year old kid:
>By a sling shot! its cheeper.
>Sin Seer Really
>Danny D.

Danny,

It has nothing to do with money. It has everything to do with your parents desire that you don't do paintballing. they don't want you to do it. observer

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
the king (jk)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:28:53 09/05/08 Fri

Americans, regardless of political party affiliation, should step forward and DEMAND the media cease and stop attacking individuals and spreading rumors, etc. If the media continues its despicable attacks, then people who care, people who believe in fairness, should step forward and cancel their subscriptions to the media which is in the attack mode. The Democrats control the media for the most part and are backed by nutty millionaires intent to change America.
\
So, there is the PInhead, the Patriot and at the top of the media scum - the asshole otherwise known as AH.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
H Fulda
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:01:15 04/27/05 Wed

Bill I would like to contribute something to those people helping the border patrol to safeguard our southern border.
Our northern border..there should be surveilance there as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times and get back after a long time of waiting, an unsatifying answer.
I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Islam religion


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:59:25 10/30/05 Sun

>When are we going to realize that the Islam religion sponsors terrorist organizations and should be obliterated.
I do not trust them and am afraid.
Staten Island

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Islam religion


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:28:24 02/07/06 Tue

To The Nameless:

Posetive Protons
Energy Electrons
Activates Atoms
Constant Cause
Elevation Explotions

i Arm
Sun Leg
LOrd Leg
Am Arm
Master Head


Master
O=cypher
Savior
Kin
A.L.L.A.H

Be not affraid,
matter can not be destroyed.
Sin Seer ReaLLy, Danny D a.k.a "Moska"

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: the theory, beginning 700b.c.


Author:
ralph jackson
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:08:10 02/24/06 Fri

For the satisfaction of his desire: His invention of his god tell him to go into the world and preach my gospell, I am the truth, the way and the light. There is no other god but his god. Says the great satan dictator of the world. The enslaver of black people for four hundred years. Civilizing the world, colonizing the world, freeing and democratizing the world. Do he really think world people do not understand his game? Superpower, world power is the mentality of this beast.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: the theory, beginning 700b.c.


Author:
ralph jackson
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:11:11 02/24/06 Fri

For the satisfaction of his desire: His invention of his god tell him to go into the world and preach my gospell, I am the truth, the way and the light. There is no other god but his god. Says the great satan dictator of the world. The enslaver of black people for four hundred years. Civilizing the world, colonizing the world, freeing and democratizing the world. Do he really think world people do not understand his game? Superpower, world power is the mentality of this beast.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Islam religion


Author:
Larry Pfeiffer
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:24:25 04/07/06 Fri

>>When are we going to realize that the Islam religion
>sponsors terrorist organizations and should be
>obliterated.
>I do not trust them and am afraid.
>Staten Island
You are 110% correct. We are fundamentally fighting a religious war and too bad that our elected officials just don't get it. Mohammed the so called prophet of Islam was a war general and a butcher if you read his history. Islam preaches hatred of all other religions especially christianity for which it has been at war for hundreds of years. Just like christians there are moderates within Islam but unlike christians they will not stand up against the barbaric teachings of the Quran. All these so called spokepersons of Islam that get onto various television shows and proclaim that Islam is a peaceful religion, are either ignorant or putting on a sham. All one has to do is look at what the Palestinian voters did by electing a terroist organization to represent the majority of the people. Their vote for Hamas is a good indication of how peaceful their so called religion really is. Our President and elected officials need to wake up and smell the coffee burning.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: Islam religion


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:54:07 07/26/07 Thu

>>When are we going to realize that the Islam religion
>sponsors terrorist organizations and should be
>obliterated.
>I do not trust them and am afraid.
>Staten Island

I have read the Koran. It is a manual for taking over any people and forcibly converting them to Islam. President Bush had it wrong when he said that it is a religion of peace. To Islam peace equates to submission. When they say they want to live in peace with another people they mean they want the other people to be submissive to them.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Geronda Jenkins
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:26:45 01/05/06 Thu

>Bill I would like to contribute something to those
>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>southern border.
>Our northern border..there should be surveilance there
>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>unsatifying answer.
>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due
>to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Benjamin Garrick
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:52:04 02/07/06 Tue

On this subject, you may want to go to ben@bensplace.us and examine the material there on the book DETROIT: AUTUMN RED. The subject is directly in line with your concerns. Although you should heed the legal disclaimer, please make up your own mind. I think you'll find the information factual.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Dick Booth (Confused)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:07:11 07/11/07 Wed

>I am asking this question of you because I respect your opinions. My question is when a pregnant woman kills her child by way of an abortion it is legal but when someone kills her resulting in the death of her unborn child he is charged with double murder. What legal genius came up with this absurd distinction? Abortion must then be legalized murder.
>ben@bensplace.us and examine the material there on the
>book DETROIT: AUTUMN RED. The subject is directly in
>line with your concerns. Although you should heed the
>legal disclaimer, please make up your own mind. I
>think you'll find the information factual.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: HJzpEWodtTpKuFnWMZ


Author:
Yelkerson (VVIAmUnRDZkGIUiT)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:54:46 06/25/08 Wed

comment4, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index2.otimal.com">instructional fight videos</a>, 78337, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index1.otimal.com">girl scout and green sweat suit</a>, 8-O, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index4.otimal.com">pictures of teenage boys</a>, xuq, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index3.otimal.com">shady lady hats</a>, 7553,

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: rhizCEuEODOsdzk


Author:
uhwvhf (HjwVlryyGPkX)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:52:07 09/15/08 Mon

QOmkZd <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://isbaqtnoibxa.com/">isbaqtnoibxa</a>, [url=http://doykrkvthpwy.com/]doykrkvthpwy[/url], [link=http://rspuanjysbka.com/]rspuanjysbka[/link], http://cdqgnwejftzl.com/

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:32:36 02/07/06 Tue

To: Geronda Jenkins
PLuck! the President,he is going to get his.
Sin Seer Really,
Moska

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:42:04 09/05/06 Tue

>To: Geronda Jenkins
>PLuck! the President,he is going to get his.
>Sin Seer Really,
> Moska

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
larry ryan
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:49:14 01/14/06 Sat

how about a new slogan for vermont's license plates. - vermont: the baby raper state.
perhaps there could be an advertising campaign to build up their tax base by getting pedophiles to move to vermont, centered around vermont as asafe haven for child molesters and abusers. Just a thought.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
george
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:56:47 06/10/06 Sat

>how about a new slogan for vermont's license plates. -
>vermont: the baby raper state.
>perhaps there could be an advertising campaign to
>build up their tax base by getting pedophiles to move
>to vermont, centered around vermont as asafe haven for
>child molesters and abusers. Just a thought.In Tyler Tex. on 9 June a child molester was convicted and sentanced to 180 days in the county jail and 5 years probation! The jury was so ashamed they would not come out of the jury room.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Ben Hamilton
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:42:32 06/29/06 Thu

Bill,A question I'm sure you can answer,why is it that a minority with only 13th percent of the population has to represented in every news cast, commercial, and T V show on the air today. Are we in the pocket of Jessie Jackson, and his ilke? Most of the "Afroamericans,{Most of whom don't know where Africa is} should kiss the ground they are walking on that their parents escaped the black content where their future would be very bleak.
Thnk you. Ben Hamilton, a loyal viewer.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
WILLIAM OBANNON
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:36:09 02/01/06 Wed

>Bill I would like to contribute something to those
>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>southern border.
>Our northern border..there should be surveilance there
>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>unsatifying answer.
>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due
>to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
WILLIAM OBANNON
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:51:05 02/01/06 Wed

BILL I WONDER IF MRS CLINTON IS GOING TO STAND UP A ND CLAP WHEN THE PEOPLE SHE REPRESENTS DONT RECEIVE A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK.THE DEMOCRATS ALL HATE BUSH BUT HAVE NO AGENDA OF THEIR OWN.JUST DISCONTENT.IWAs ablack democrat but i will never vote for another piece of trash they have become. by the way what happened to lori dui.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
tom cubbage
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:13:04 03/31/06 Fri

>BILL I WONDER IF MRS CLINTON IS GOING TO STAND UP A ND
>CLAP WHEN THE PEOPLE SHE REPRESENTS DONT RECEIVE A
>SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK.THE DEMOCRATS ALL HATE BUSH BUT
>HAVE NO AGENDA OF THEIR OWN.JUST DISCONTENT.IWAs
>ablack democrat but i will never vote for another
>piece of trash they have become. by the way what
>happened to lori dui.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:15:03 03/31/06 Fri

>>BILL I WONDER IF MRS CLINTON IS GOING TO STAND UP A ND
>>CLAP WHEN THE PEOPLE SHE REPRESENTS DONT RECEIVE A
>>SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK.THE DEMOCRATS ALL HATE BUSH BUT
>>HAVE NO AGENDA OF THEIR OWN.JUST DISCONTENT.IWAs
>>ablack democrat but i will never vote for another
>>piece of trash they have become. by the way what
>>happened to lori dui.
she won't care.
she's got hers, from the Clintonites who have made she and Slick Willie very rich millionaires through their pandering.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:15:32 10/27/06 Fri

>>Bill I would like to contribute something to those
>>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>>southern border.
>>Our northern border..there should be surveilance there
>>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>>unsatifying answer.
>>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due
>>to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
john walsh
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:59:54 07/02/07 Mon

>>>today is july 2,. scooter libby's sentence has just been commuted.. not a word about it on your show. fair and balanced my ass. your show and network are a fraud.ll I would like to contribute something to those
>>>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>>>southern border.
>>>Our northern border..there should be surveilance
>there
>>>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>>>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>>>unsatifying answer.
>>>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to
>due
>>>to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
dean (annoyed)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:43:51 11/17/06 Fri

>>Bill I would like to contribute something to those
>>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>>southern border.
>>Our northern border..there should be surveilance there
>>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>>unsatifying answer.
>>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due
>>to a better, challenging oponent.
I was hit by an underaged female while i was walking accross the street, the driver jumped out of the car and ran away...she hasn't been apprehended. Ilost my right leg,my house and my job... guess what from what the police could determine-she was from mexico; illegally!!!! Somebody should do something about our borders, you think?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Joanne (Jay Leno Show)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:54:32 10/13/07 Sat

Bill, you did well on the Jay Leno Program. It was refreshibg to see a more gentle side of you. I also, enjoyed your humor.
I am a faithful viewer of The Factor.


Joanne
Clermont , FL

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Ken Benedict
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:53:50 02/13/06 Mon

Last I heard "judge" cashman changed his sentence to 3 yrs. Come on Bill, are you satisfied with that?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Gary Stokes
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:35:29 02/14/06 Tue

Bill why not have a lottery sponsored by the goverment and anyone who can get better mileage on the vehicles we drive,whether it be by a different carburetor or a new carburetor give them so many millon,the more they improve the mileage the larger the lottery.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Nick Liberto
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:37:03 02/14/06 Tue

>Bill,
I am with you inre the punishment should match the crime. All to often, some 'winkie' defense lawyer cites the letter of the law, as if it supercedes the intent of that law. Do defense lawyers lose all concept of common sense when they become defense lawyers?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:23:05 02/15/06 Wed

Bill,
6 years ago, I decided to dedicate my life to God. I have been studying His Word "The Bible" ever since then. It has totally changed my life. Even though I have a 9 year child with a severe disability,caused by a pro-longed seizure at the age of 3, I chose to turn to the Lord instead of blaming Him and turning away from Him. But in order to know exactly what His plans for my life were, I had to study His Word. And His Word gave me purpose and gave me the grace to go on even though we had such a tragedy happen to us.
My point here is that, just think if everyone would decide to dedicate at least 6 years to the Word of God, what kind of world this would be. The Word of God gives me peace, guidance, wisdom, discernment and a whole lot more. I wish everyone would be more open minded and just give it 6 years of their lives. The Word of God is living and sharper than any two edged sword and it can really refine us and help us to live holy lives.
Well, even though I know this is only wishful thinking, it gives us something to think about.
I really enjoy your show. My husband and I watch is every evening before reading The Word.
God Bless,
and Thank you for looking out for us.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
tirdad gharib
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:34:21 02/24/06 Fri

>good evenning bill as a strong supporter of you
> and all my respect to you, the republic islamic of iran is a criminall terrorist regime. they are behind all the killings and bombings.as well as alqaida, syria and hammas.. as a swiss citizen and an american citizen, and a strong republican, we can not afford a mistake by giving our six major port to a country like dubai. lets close our borders so the terrorist wont come from mexico and canada.please air my email on your show thanks alot.
>
>there should be a very strong surveilance over our borders our airports and the immigration. from beverly hills california very sincerlly yours tirdad tel 310 247 1823 or 760 420 2851.
>
>
>
>
>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
tirdad gharib
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:38:22 02/24/06 Fri

>>good evenning bill as a strong supporter of you
>> and all my respect to you, the republic islamic
>of iran is a criminall terrorist regime. they are
>behind all the killings and bombings.as well as
>alqaida, syria and hammas.. as a swiss citizen and an
>american citizen, and a strong republican, we can
>not afford a mistake by giving our six major port
>to a country like dubai. lets close our borders so
>the terrorist wont come from mexico and
>canada.please air my email on your show thanks alot.
>>
>>there should be a very strong surveilance over our
>borders our airports and the immigration. from
>beverly hills california very sincerlly yours tirdad
>tel 310 247 1823 or 760 420 2851.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:06:34 02/27/06 Mon

>Bill; If those people in New Orleans have the time, money and energy to spend on Madris Gras why in the world should our government and charitable organizations have to worry where the next dollar will come from to support people who are looking for a handout and planning the next drunken party? Trying to get back to life in Port Arthur, TX.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Once-Griffing Park Guy
[Edit]

Date Posted: 04:30:42 03/30/08 Sun

Rehabbing Port Arthur from its old Glory Days as a petrochemical mfg. center in the 1950's, to a major US Port of Entry in the 200o's should be an interesting task for you to work on, now that you're getting back to life there. What is the current economic state down there in the land of Janis Joplin?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
CELESTINO J. PRADO
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:02:11 03/02/06 Thu

>
Bill I am a fan of your show and watch it just about every day. During my frequent overseas travels however, I have difficulties getting the Fox Channel , including prior to my departures from home in Miami where it looks like in every American Airlines Lounge, including all the departure Gates have the TV set always on CNN. I find this unfortunate, as all
CNN does is chastise what the our country stands for. I believe Fox needs to sharpen their sales team when it comes to selling Fox to these locations. Ratings indicate this is the chanel most americans like to see for their news.
Keep up the good work, and do not forget that Castro continues to be a terrorist only 90 miles from our shores.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Gary Pringle (discussed)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:48:53 05/25/07 Fri

Bill,

It appears that the rise in gas prices has gotten to Rosey O'Donald. Her brain is running on vapor fumes, while her mouth has a full tank.

Gary Pringle
Topeka, Kansas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Don Matlock
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:00:24 04/15/08 Tue

>>Obama scares me with his chooses in friends. That said, he will never get my vote. I consitered Hilary,not any more. P.S. I looked at your ties. To much money for me but I am happy to see my fellow Americans doing what than can.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Cindy (real middle american)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:00:02 10/08/08 Wed

>>>Obama has scary middle east ties where are our white men fighting the battles to bring such ties out instead of small email blogs........HELP BILL YOU ARE IN THE NO SPIN ZONE ............DO IT WE WILL THANK YOU.........PROMISE.. need help let me know ....not scared to speak the truth!!!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:03:06 10/08/08 Wed

>>>>Obama has scary middle east ties where are our
>white men fighting the battles to bring such ties out
>instead of small email blogs........HELP BILL YOU ARE
>IN THE NO SPIN ZONE ............DO IT WE WILL THANK
>YOU.........PROMISE.. need help let me know ....not
>scared to speak the truth!!!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
terry cyb
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:21:33 06/19/08 Thu

>>
>Bill I am a fan of your show and watch it just about
>every day. During my frequent overseas travels
>however, I have difficulties getting the Fox Channel ,
>including prior to my departures from home in Miami
>where it looks like in every American Airlines Lounge,
>including all the departure Gates have the TV set
>always on CNN. I find this unfortunate, as all
>CNN does is chastise what the our country stands for.
>I believe Fox needs to sharpen their sales team when
>it comes to selling Fox to these locations. Ratings
>indicate this is the chanel most americans like to see
>for their news.
>Keep up the good work, and do not forget that Castro
>continues to be a terrorist only 90 miles from our
>shores.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Mona Gorsline (Proud To Be An American!!!!)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:01:44 06/21/08 Sat

>Dear Bill Have a question? My Brother argues that their is not a freeze on oil drilling on our coast. Pres.Bush has asked congress to lift the ban. Do I understand it right. I might add my brother a flaming Dem!!!! Thank-You Mona
>>
>,
>
>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: 'Time table for withdrawal' and oil problem


Author:
Tom Saunders, LTC . USAR retired, Professor Emeritus, UNM
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:42:37 07/22/08 Tue

>>
>Bill, can you imagine how hard it is on a retired military man to see a bunch of civilian politicians and pundits pushing for a 'time-table' for withdrawal from Iraq. A basic principal of war, never give a time table for attack or withdrawal to your enemy, much less in the middle of a war.
Last night Jay Leno and Chris Mathews were lauding Obama's visit to Iraq and the sense of getting a 'time-table' for a withdrawal. "They, the president of Iraq want us out of there, so lets get out of there." President Bush and his commanders are doing just that, the brigade of the surge is out of there and more troops are being deployed to Afgan. Common sense dictates that you do not announce these moves, to say nothing of the principals of warfare. In WWII you would have been shot for releasing such information to the enemy!
Common sense and wisdom escaped our Congress over the past twenty years starting with shutting down any futher drilling or building on U.S. soil, Nuclear Plants, new refineries, natural gas drilling. This move was to appease the environmentalist. They went too far, not realizing the gap they caused when they turned off the spigot of our prime energy sources with the stupid idea that alternative sources of energy like solar and wind could take of the slack of our growing population resulting in growing demand.
Now to cover up their responsiblity for our energy crisis, they throw out the old reasons and lies to cover their mistake of the past. Saying the old stuff, oil drilling in ANWR and offshore will not come on line for years, the say anywhere from 5years to twenty, what a coincidence they said the same things twenty years ago. Now the problem will be solved with their restrictions on speculators, granted that is part of the problem but too little for the long range problem that will persist unless we build new nuclear plants, refineries, drill in ANWR...etc Until alternative fuels can catch up, and when that happens then and only then turn off the old spigot!
The left does not give a damn if our country becomes a third world type and no longer a super power. Hell, back in 1995, Bill Clinton told an audiance that "we must prepare for when we are no longer a super power or the only one." I am sure he had China in mind, especially when his administration was passing high tech data to China for their rocket programs. Bill Richerson was Clinton's energy secretary at this time, you might remember they arrested a poor guy, Chinese ancestry American, who was later released after a year in jail, that man sued and won a nice sum. He's still up at Los Alamos while the data that arrived in China was classified a just a mistake and missing computer disks.
The dumb just get dumber. McCain admitted that Congress had let the people down, but the people really responsible and still responsible will admit nothing and just want to go after Big Oil, and throw more money at technology for alternative enery sources. The same avenue we have been on since the 1970's and the solar panals on houses back then until now, wind power has been around for centuries. Congress must get off its hands and do something even if it is years away, then at least we are moving in the right direction instead of standing still and going down the economic drain.
You tell me that if we do go in the right direction that the value of our dollar will not rise? Just the mention by President Bush about lifting the restriction of off shore drilling had an impact on our dollar and our economy. The rest of the world recognized that we had realized our stupidity of the past and maybe, just maybe the United States is on the avenue of success to solving our energy crisis and the world's crisis.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
George (Racist Commercials)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 05:38:21 08/03/08 Sun

Bill O'Reilly,
I disagree with you much of the time, but I respect your willingness to discuss most subjects. If any anchor will deal with what I'm about to say I figure it will be you.
At one time I as an independent said I would vote for
J. McCain over H. Clinton. That would have been a huge
mistake as J. McCain has shown his racist mind. I
found it quite insulting when Pres. Clinton was
referred to as the first black president during one of the debates.
Think of what the McCain campaign did. They compared Obama a
brilliant young black man, graduating at the top of
his class at Harvard Law school to two young Caucasian
women of limited education. That’s about as racist as
one can get, Caucasian women are know better then any
other women on the face of this earth. They like all
humans come in many forms, brilliant, imbeciles,
beautiful, ugly, kind, selfish. Since he felt the need
to air such a ridiculous add, why couldn’t he use an
African American, such as D. Washington or Will Smith? No!!! he knew exactly what he was doing, appealing to the fears and ignorance of some insecure Caucasians. I say some because most are not, but all it takes is a small percentage to effect the outcome of this election. America is one of the greatest countries of all time on the planet earth, but until it admits that racism built this country and attacks the disease of ignorance and fear that racism fosters, it will never achieve its potential as the greatest Nation of all time. I believe that many people
are not racist, but there are enough racist in this great
country to make life difficult for many none
Caucasians. The media and most people in this society are afraid to address the issue of race openly and honestly. If J. McCain can link a brilliant young black man with two young Caucasian women of limited education, the symbol that has always been held up as the standard of purity and hardly anything is said publicly, I rest my case. If the American public expects moderate Muslims to speak out against radical islamist, then the same standard should be expected of the majority of Caucasians against the racist
minority, unless that majority agrees with the racist
minority. When Obama reacts to these baseless
statements, he is called a racist. Think about it, when
McCain continuely attacked Obama while he was out of
the country, Obama always took the high road, side
stepping comments about McCain. Don’t let some of the racist
republicans steal this election with false racist
statements,. I would have no problem with confronting
McCain and the racist that crafted that insulting
commercial. Sincerely, GEORGE

PS. I wish Fox news would not prostitute their female reporters, making them dress like prostitutes. Fox News should show some class and have them dress in moderate business attire the way their male counter parts are required to dress. Fox News should give the average viewer credit for having more intelligence for wanting to get news instead of seeing into their female reporters busom and half way up their thighs. If Fox News would honor their slogan of fair and unbias news they wouldn't have to degrade their female reporters in an effort to acheive higher ratings.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Racist Commercials


Author:
George (Racist Commercials)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 05:40:59 08/03/08 Sun

>Bill O'Reilly,
>I disagree with you much of the time, but I respect
>your willingness to discuss most subjects. If any
>anchor will deal with what I'm about to say I figure
>it will be you.
>At one time I as an independent said I would vote for
>J. McCain over H. Clinton. That would have been a huge
>mistake as J. McCain has shown his racist mind. I
>found it quite insulting when Pres. Clinton was
>referred to as the first black president during one of
>the debates.
>Think of what the McCain campaign did. They compared
>Obama a
>brilliant young black man, graduating at the top of
>his class at Harvard Law school to two young Caucasian
>women of limited education. That’s about as racist as
>one can get, Caucasian women are know better then any
>other women on the face of this earth. They like all
>humans come in many forms, brilliant, imbeciles,
>beautiful, ugly, kind, selfish. Since he felt the need
>to air such a ridiculous add, why couldn’t he use an
>African American, such as D. Washington or Will Smith?
>No!!! he knew exactly what he was doing, appealing to
>the fears and ignorance of some insecure Caucasians. I
>say some because most are not, but all it takes is a
>small percentage to effect the outcome of this
>election. America is one of the greatest countries of
>all time on the planet earth, but until it admits that
>racism built this country and attacks the disease of
>ignorance and fear that racism fosters, it will never
>achieve its potential as the greatest Nation of all
>time. I believe that many people
>are not racist, but there are enough racist in this
>great
>country to make life difficult for many none
>Caucasians. The media and most people in this society
>are afraid to address the issue of race openly and
>honestly. If J. McCain can link a brilliant young
>black man with two young Caucasian women of limited
>education, the symbol that has always been held up as
>the standard of purity and hardly anything is said
>publicly, I rest my case. If the American public
>expects moderate Muslims to speak out against radical
>islamist, then the same standard should be expected of
>the majority of Caucasians against the racist
>minority, unless that majority agrees with the racist
>minority. When Obama reacts to these baseless
>statements, he is called a racist. Think about it, when
>McCain continuely attacked Obama while he was out of
>the country, Obama always took the high road, side
>stepping comments about McCain. Don’t let some of the
>racist
>republicans steal this election with false racist
>statements,. I would have no problem with confronting
>McCain and the racist that crafted that insulting
>commercial. Sincerely, GEORGE
>
>PS. I wish Fox news would not prostitute their female
>reporters, making them dress like prostitutes. Fox
>News should show some class and have them dress in
>moderate business attire the way their male counter
>parts are required to dress. Fox News should give the
>average viewer credit for having more intelligence for
>wanting to get news instead of seeing into their
>female reporters busom and half way up their thighs.
>If Fox News would honor their slogan of fair and
>unbias news they wouldn't have to degrade their female
>reporters in an effort to acheive higher ratings.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
babe coen
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:50:53 03/09/06 Thu

>went to the sight familywatch.com which on your show I was led to believe was free but they wanted money to find out where predators lived. so thought you would like to know it is not a free sight.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:50:26 05/22/06 Mon

>>went to the sight familywatch.com which on your show
>I was led to believe was free but they wanted money to
>find out where predators lived. so thought you would
>like to know it is not a free sight.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:35:26 06/12/06 Mon

>>went to the sight familywatch.com which on your show
>I was led to believe was free but they wanted money to
>find out where predators lived. so thought you would
>like to know it is not a free sight.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: HbhiLBzDmPOLLOIigM


Author:
Yelkerson (eYDjTLuacquU)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:54:03 06/25/08 Wed

comment6, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index5.otimal.com">aol save password</a>, %-)), <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index1.otimal.com">dick up ass</a>, :-)), <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index4.otimal.com">girl privates</a>, 761, <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://index3.otimal.com">shady lady hats</a>, mrr,

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
randy w.
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:08:58 03/09/06 Thu

Bill
I live in Medford Or. I went on the web last night to jacksoncounty.org and found pics and addresses of predators in my city

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:16:51 03/10/06 Fri

>Bill
> I live in Medford Or. I went on the web last night
>to jacksoncounty.org and found pics and addresses of
>predators in my city

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:04:10 03/15/06 Wed

We are getting a Jessica's law in Michigan. I think that's grrrrreat.

Jeff Ramsdell
Rockwood, Mi.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Julie kandlstorfer
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:17:50 03/22/06 Wed

>Bill, I have just seen the segment on your show where they were mocking Catholics, dressed as nuns and Jesus. It sickens me to death each time I see the lack of respect in this country for Christians. WHY ARE NO CHRISTIANS STANDING UP AGAINST THESE PEOPLE? IF A CHRISTIAN SHOWS THE LEAST RESPECT TO GOD, LIKE THE NATIVITY SCENE, WE ARE ATTACKED THAT WE OFFENDED THEM. All we ever hear is we offend someone... GOOD I HOPE WE OFFEND THEM MAYBE THEIR SOUL WILL REACT.....INSTEAD OF THEIR MOUTHS.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
David Creig Boyd
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:37:27 03/27/06 Mon

>Bill I would like you ask Alec Bladwin and all the other move pen heads what are they doing for the soldiers that are fighting to give these pen heads the freedom to do what they are doing.



Please read this, then send it to everybody you know.

They'll thank you as they forward this to others as well.



Subject: Denzel Washington, and

Brooks Army Medical Center

Don't know whether you heard about this but Denzel Washington and his family visited the troops at Brook Army Medical Center, in San Antonio,Texas (BAMC) the other day. This is where soldiers who have been evacuated from

Germany come to be hospitalized in the United

States, especially burn victims. There are some buildings there called Fisher Houses. The Fisher House is a Hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in the Hospital. BAMC has quite a few of these houses on base, but as you can imagine, they are almost filled most of the time.

While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave him a tour of one of the Fisher Houses. He asked how much one of them would cost to build. He took his checkbook out and wrote a check for the full amount right thereon the spot. The soldiers overseas were amazed to hearthis story and want to get the word out to the Americanpublic, because it warmed their hearts to hear it.

The question I have is why does:

Alec Baldwin,

Madonna,

Sean Penn and other Hollywood types make front page news with their anti-everything America crap and Denzel Washington's Patriotism doesn't even make page 3 in the Metro section of any newspaper except the Local newspaper in San Antonio.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
lorri (curious)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:24:13 08/16/06 Wed

>>Bill I would like you ask Alec Bladwin and all the
>other move pen heads what are they doing for the
>soldiers that are fighting to give these pen heads the
>freedom to do what they are doing.
>
>
>
>Please read this, then send it to everybody you know.
>
>They'll thank you as they forward this to others as
>well.
>
>
>
>Subject: Denzel Washington, and
>
> Brooks Army Medical Center
>
>Don't know whether you heard about this but Denzel
>Washington and his family visited the troops at Brook
>Army Medical Center, in San Antonio,Texas (BAMC) the
>other day. This is where soldiers who have been
>evacuated from
>
>Germany come to be hospitalized in the United
>
>States, especially burn victims. There are some
>buildings there called Fisher Houses. The Fisher House
>is a Hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for
>little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in
>the Hospital. BAMC has quite a few of these houses on
>base, but as you can imagine, they are almost filled
>most of the time.
>
>While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave
>him a tour of one of the Fisher Houses. He asked how
>much one of them would cost to build. He took his
>checkbook out and wrote a check for the full amount
>right thereon the spot. The soldiers overseas were
>amazed to hearthis story and want to get the word out
>to the Americanpublic, because it warmed their hearts
>to hear it.
>
>The question I have is why does:
>
>Alec Baldwin,
>
>Madonna,
>
>Sean Penn and other Hollywood types make front page
>news with their anti-everything America crap and
>Denzel Washington's Patriotism doesn't even make page
>3 in the Metro section of any newspaper except the
>Local newspaper in San Antonio.

Would like to know just what it was that was said or done by Alec Baldwin /Madonna and Sean Pean that is anti -everthing American... one example for each is good... I have recieved and e mail looking for facts of this... Thank you in advance... lorri

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:25:20 08/16/06 Wed

>>>Bill I would like you ask Alec Bladwin and all the
>>other move pen heads what are they doing for the
>>soldiers that are fighting to give these pen heads the
>>freedom to do what they are doing.
>>
>>
>>
>>Please read this, then send it to everybody you know.
>>
>>They'll thank you as they forward this to others as
>>well.
>>
>>
>>
>>Subject: Denzel Washington, and
>>
>> Brooks Army Medical Center
>>
>>Don't know whether you heard about this but Denzel
>>Washington and his family visited the troops at Brook
>>Army Medical Center, in San Antonio,Texas (BAMC) the
>>other day. This is where soldiers who have been
>>evacuated from
>>
>>Germany come to be hospitalized in the United
>>
>>States, especially burn victims. There are some
>>buildings there called Fisher Houses. The Fisher House
>>is a Hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for
>>little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in
>>the Hospital. BAMC has quite a few of these houses on
>>base, but as you can imagine, they are almost filled
>>most of the time.
>>
>>While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave
>>him a tour of one of the Fisher Houses. He asked how
>>much one of them would cost to build. He took his
>>checkbook out and wrote a check for the full amount
>>right thereon the spot. The soldiers overseas were
>>amazed to hearthis story and want to get the word out
>>to the Americanpublic, because it warmed their hearts
>>to hear it.
>>
>>The question I have is why does:
>>
>>Alec Baldwin,
>>
>>Madonna,
>>
>>Sean Penn and other Hollywood types make front page
>>news with their anti-everything America crap and
>>Denzel Washington's Patriotism doesn't even make page
>>3 in the Metro section of any newspaper except the
>>Local newspaper in San Antonio.
>
>Would like to know just what it was that was said or
>done by Alec Baldwin /Madonna and Sean Pean that is
>anti -everthing American... one example for each is
>good... I have recieved and e mail looking for facts
>of this... Thank you in advance... lorri

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Vickie Slabbaert, Houston, T
[Edit]

Date Posted: 02:08:00 04/24/07 Tue

Mr. O'Reilly, Thank you for having the guts to NOT run the Alec Baldwin taped message to his daughter. Having a somewhat similar situation in my own family, I can fully understand his frustration. Why was this conversation taped in the first place? Disgruntled Mom, that's why. I applaud your decision. The poor 11-yr old is the one in the middle of this mess. Frankly, I'm rather sick of hearing this tape. My husband and I watch your show faithfully.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Gloria Thompson
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:14:35 09/19/06 Tue

>>Bill I would like you ask Alec Bladwin and all the
>other move pen heads what are they doing for the
>soldiers that are fighting to give these pen heads the
>freedom to do what they are doing.
>
>
>
>Please read this, then send it to everybody you know.
>
>They'll thank you as they forward this to others as
>well.
>
>
>
>Subject: Denzel Washington, and
>
> Brooks Army Medical Center
>
>Don't know whether you heard about this but Denzel
>Washington and his family visited the troops at Brook
>Army Medical Center, in San Antonio,Texas (BAMC) the
>other day. This is where soldiers who have been
>evacuated from
>
>Germany come to be hospitalized in the United
>
>States, especially burn victims. There are some
>buildings there called Fisher Houses. The Fisher House
>is a Hotel where soldiers' families can stay, for
>little or no charge, while their soldier is staying in
>the Hospital. BAMC has quite a few of these houses on
>base, but as you can imagine, they are almost filled
>most of the time.
>
>While Denzel Washington was visiting BAMC, they gave
>him a tour of one of the Fisher Houses. He asked how
>much one of them would cost to build. He took his
>checkbook out and wrote a check for the full amount
>right thereon the spot. The soldiers overseas were
>amazed to hearthis story and want to get the word out
>to the Americanpublic, because it warmed their hearts
>to hear it.
>
>The question I have is why does:
>
>Alec Baldwin,
>
>Madonna,
>
>Sean Penn and other Hollywood types make front page
>news with their anti-everything America crap and
>Denzel Washington's Patriotism doesn't even make page
>3 in the Metro section of any newspaper except the
>Local newspaper in San Antonio.
Are there any good news papers out there or T.V. stations,that will start to report more stories like this?I am sick of reading and hearing about the likes of Madonna,Alec Baldwin,and Sean Pean, who cares what they think? They live in a dream world!If they hate this country so much move to France!I appreciate actors like Denzel, who are doing something with their time, money, and using their talents for good. Why don't we hear about this story ABC,NBC,CNN,CBS?Fox news, we are just waiting,we know you will and we can depend on Bill.Thanks

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Joyce Middlebrooks
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:48:40 10/27/06 Fri


To Bill O'Reilly

Please Read and send to all that you thank will help me to

help other that are in need please help me. send to

Denzel Washington, and Madonna, and the rest of your world.

My name is Joyce Middlebrooks I am a member of the

Faith Temple Church of Elizabeth, NJ we will be sponsoring a Christmas Program that will be held on
Sunday, December 17, 2006.

This program is an outreach to underprivileged children.

The program will provide and distribute gifts to the families of these children. Unfortunately, we need help in accomplishing this task and would greatly appreciate your assistance by donating items for infants to the ages of 16 years of age.

We also have a few young peoples age 17 & 18 that are still in school I would love to give them a bless Christmas to I have been doing this for three years now but can’t do it along I need your help please.

If you need additional information please I can be reached

@ {908}353-0009 Otherwise please respond to:

Ms. Joyce Middlebrooks
745 Pearl Street 4-D
Elizabeth, New Jersey 07202


We Appreciate your Assistance and Thanks in Advance

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
p gibson (curious)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:47:05 09/05/07 Wed

I don't remember ever hearing anything bad about Mr. Washington except that I heard someone accuse him of being a racist. Rumors are terrible. On the otherhand, Alec Baldwin needs to contol his temper and Madonna needs to get over herself. One should aspire to be an Angelina or a Brad. MEDIA, leave these two alone. I am not surprised that
I have heard a good things about Mr Denzel Washington. If I could only hear that about Mr. O'Reilly also. There have been times that I have agreed with you. Those were few and far between, but agreed none the less. Your view on pedofiles and illegals is right on the money. But just because I believe in freedom of choice DOES NOT mean that I think that abortion is OK. Where di the ultra- consertives get off telling me that just becuase i believe in one, I have to believe in the other???? Please explain this to me.....
By the way, Keith Olberman is my hero!!!!!

Thanks for letting me vent....

p gibson
knoxville, tn go Vols!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
ciro (zero)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:48:57 03/27/06 Mon

BILL, I BET NO ONE IN DC EVER THOUGHT OF THIS. GIVE THE MEXICAN GOV'T A BONUS FOR EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN THEY CAN LURE BACK TO MEXICO AND THEN TATOO EACH ON SO WE NOT PAYING FOR THE SAME ONE ALL THE TIME. AND IF THEY COME BACK TO THE US AND HAVE A TATOO, SHOOT THEM.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Eduardo Baz Harvill (I am proud of beeing mexican)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:22:31 08/20/06 Sun

>BILL, I BET NO ONE IN DC EVER THOUGHT OF THIS. GIVE
>THE MEXICAN GOV'T A BONUS FOR EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN THEY
>CAN LURE BACK TO MEXICO AND THEN TATOO EACH ON SO WE
>NOT PAYING FOR THE SAME ONE ALL THE TIME. AND IF THEY
>COME BACK TO THE US AND HAVE A TATOO, SHOOT THEM.

I was expecting to be able to email my Oreilly, but I guess you have to buy his book first, anyway I know the americans hate us, dont worry we hate you back, you are right, americans are good at tatoing people they did it with the blacks, or nigers, in the XIX, century, I dont doubt they will do it next to mexicans, after all you can shoot mexicans on the back and kill them on the border, but God forbide if you tell a jew he is a jew, and that the israelies are responsible for the war in the midle east.

We are going the inagurate a new president the first of december, I am sure you dont know that, but I hope he has a more dignified actitude towards the USA.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Ridell Jones (Proud to be black)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:19:17 05/03/07 Thu

Hey "proud to be mexican"... how the hell can you be defending Mexicans against racist atacks and call black people "noggers"...

I love Mexican people... I think that they are hard working sentimental and family oriented people but you definitly are a disgrace to all my great mexicans friends.

You new president "calderon" should tatoo and ass hole in your face.

>>BILL, I BET NO ONE IN DC EVER THOUGHT OF THIS. GIVE
>>THE MEXICAN GOV'T A BONUS FOR EVERY ILLEGAL ALIEN THEY
>>CAN LURE BACK TO MEXICO AND THEN TATOO EACH ON SO WE
>>NOT PAYING FOR THE SAME ONE ALL THE TIME. AND IF THEY
>>COME BACK TO THE US AND HAVE A TATOO, SHOOT THEM.
>
>I was expecting to be able to email my Oreilly, but I
>guess you have to buy his book first, anyway I know
>the americans hate us, dont worry we hate you back,
>you are right, americans are good at tatoing people
>they did it with the blacks, or nigers, in the XIX,
>century, I dont doubt they will do it next to
>mexicans, after all you can shoot mexicans on the
>back and kill them on the border, but God forbide if
>you tell a jew he is a jew, and that the israelies are
>responsible for the war in the midle east.
>
>We are going the inagurate a new president the first
>of december, I am sure you dont know that, but I hope
>he has a more dignified actitude towards the USA.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
John from the Midwest
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:48:48 03/28/06 Tue

Bill,
Don't you think it might be worthwhile to translate into English the film footage we have of Abdul Rahman, the Afghan marked for death by Islamic law for becoming a Christian? I can understand why other networks have not done this . . . but you? We may be really missing something here. Why not give it a try?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Ssg Regino
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:23:49 04/09/06 Sun

>Bill I would like to thank you for supporting the troops. It's good to see someone stand-up for us. This is my 2nd tour here. Please tell my I am O.K. she is in Jacksonville, FL

THANK-YOU

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Winifred Mcmahon
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:24:20 04/10/06 Mon

>
>
When this idiotic congress caters to illegal immigrants are they then elgible for minimum wage scale?









>

>
>


>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
ROBERT in NEVADA
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:52:34 05/01/06 Mon

>Bill, there is a big story out there that nobody seems to want to talk about. It is Workmans Comp. Insurance. It is supposed to be there for the benefit of employees? I don't think so. Got injured on the job? You need to get a lawyer. Then jump through the hoops. Get abused by your employer.
All the while fighting for what should have been taken care of without all this mess in the first place.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Jerry Fisher
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:59:14 05/05/06 Fri

Bad, O'Reilly. I wanted to hear what the professor had to say (Condolezza Rice segment) I listened to you, but you cut him off. Fair and balanced?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
L.A
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:05:27 05/06/06 Sat

>Bill I heard that the Las Vegas police went to the extremes at the Laughlin motorcycle rally. People at all rallys tend to hold up signs asking the biker woman to show their brests.The LV police booked these people as sex offenders, dont you think thats going a little to far?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
L.A
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:13:12 05/06/06 Sat

>Bill I heard that the Las Vegas police went to the extremes at the Laughlin motorcycle rally. People at all rallys tend to hold up signs asking the biker woman to show their breasts.The LV police booked these people as sex offenders, dont you think thats going a little to far?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
johnny gray
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:03:26 05/08/06 Mon

Bill, proof of the illigals taking over the US, annoucements on transit busses in spanish, customer service at Mervyns(dial 1 to speak english). why in America do I have to dial 1 to speak english? Our government is really giving away my country.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Cfeminis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:24:36 05/15/06 Mon

Bill - Just love your program. Watch you almost every night. Why does this great country of ours have bilingual? We don't we have it for other legal immigrants, why should we have it for the Mexican's. If you are in this country, speak or learn to speak ENGLISH. No exceptions.
Tired of seeing signs in Spanish and American. Hate phone calls: For english, press 1 - for spanish, press 2. If this is the case, press 3 for greek, press 4 for polish, etc. Why favor the Mexican's?

CF from Illinois

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Jo
[Edit]

Date Posted: 03:53:34 05/18/06 Thu

>There is a conference of the International Town/City Clerks meeting in Anaheim, California. Any chance we could learn of the elections of officers going on there? We have a "David and Goliath" election going on for 2nd Vice and our small town Clerk is one of the people running for this office.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
jowms@vtel.net
[Edit]

Date Posted: 03:54:37 05/18/06 Thu

>>There is a conference of the International Town/City
>Clerks meeting in Anaheim, California. Any chance we
>could learn of the elections of officers going on
>there? We have a "David and Goliath" election going on
>for 2nd Vice and our small town Clerk is one of the
>people running for this office.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
John Ford (Smile it is wonderful)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:50:02 07/24/06 Mon

>Bill isn't it a shame, only about 11% of the US population watched tour de france, 45% said they did not watch le tour, and 40% said why start watching it now, nobody american will win it now since Lance Armstrong retired...OH boy where they wrong I watched it from day one I belived Landis could drack the tour even in his condition, he deserves an applause!!!!

Sure Tiger woods was also watched here...great americans!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
pannell strawbridge (illegal immigration)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:45:05 08/22/06 Tue

bill as an afro-american I say let the invasion of illegals continue. Let them take over;heck they can't treat us afro-americans any worst than the europeans!The europeans enslaved us, hung us, degraded us, striped us of our heritage. Now please understand that I'm speaking in general, not all europeans, however by in large the ones in charge and the others in general did not care! that's from the church, goverment, law enforcement, the school system, the caucasian society in general.They never seemed to truly embrace us!Look Bill some of my best friends are caucasians (smile)! I say let the invasion continue and let the cards fall as they may.Bill how will this invasion hurt the poor, the under privilege,the African Americans and American Indians?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Nick Liberto (Pittsburgh, Pa.)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:34:41 09/28/06 Thu

Bill,
Clarify something. Discussing Mrs. Clinton with Dick Morris, you thought she was a strong candidate for Pres.
Then, with Mrs. Pirro, you thought her standing by her husband brought her judgement into question. Why would no one consider Hillary's judgement to be worse for sticking by Bill?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:33:55 10/01/06 Sun

>Bill I would like to contribute something to those
>people helping the border patrol to safeguard our
>southern border.
>Our northern border..there should be surveilance there
>as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times
>and get back after a long time of waiting, an
>unsatifying answer.
>I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due
>to a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
carmen Orvananos
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:40:22 10/01/06 Sun

Bill I watched aq nat.geo program on Ali Mohamed yesterday, there is no way Clinton is at fault along the CIA and FBI regarding the ability to prevent 9/11.There were plenty signs that this man was connected to Bin Laden and wanted to harm U.S. Have you seen this program???> Carmen Orvananos Mexico City

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Howard Crevia III (serious)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:47:36 06/14/07 Thu

Dr. Tiller needs to learn that the word "Fetus" describes a
stage of development of a human being, not some alternate
life form. Is'nt it ironic that folks like him that are
pro abortion, have already been born.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Richard D.Camp,SR (MAD)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:16:22 06/26/07 Tue

Bill, The United States needs to adopt Mexico's laws pertaing to illegal alien's crossing their southern border
and how Mexico treats them.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Richard D. Camp, Sr.
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:46:08 06/26/07 Tue

Bill, The United States needs to adopt Mexico's laws pertaining to the treatment of illegal aliens crossing their southern border.

I would also like to contribute something to the people helping the border patrol to safeguard our southern border.

Our northern border, there should be surveilance there as well. I have written to the President 3 or 4 times and get back, after a long time of waiting, an unsatifying answer. I threatened not to vote for him but was forced to due to a lack of a better, challenging oponent.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Rose Torian Galt, CA. (sad)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:07:07 07/04/07 Wed

Bill I am a 77 year old woman. I have had family in all wars since world war I.What happerned today July 4th.
Where are the tv shows showing how americans are celebrating today.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: ytIpnRjSWKykkZ


Author:
jgwbqhf (hYNLVKfwQfDxUuRAC)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:14:19 09/15/08 Mon

fnYIZ2 <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://lvxxandtktuz.com/">lvxxandtktuz</a>, [url=http://oeaprxkqqefd.com/]oeaprxkqqefd[/url], [link=http://vhsmzzdnyifj.com/]vhsmzzdnyifj[/link], http://nwpocnnqlaqt.com/

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: ytIpnRjSWKykkZ


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:14:53 09/15/08 Mon


>fnYIZ2 <a rel=nofollow target=_blank
>href="http://lvxxandtktuz.com/">lvxxandtktuz</a>,
>[url=http://oeaprxkqqefd.com/]oeaprxkqqefd[/url],
>[link=http://vhsmzzdnyifj.com/]vhsmzzdnyifj[/link],
>http://nwpocnnqlaqt.com/

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:36:34 08/06/05 Sat

Hi Bill;
I tried to find where to sign the partition about the illegal aliens but I could not find the link. If you would send me instructions by E-Mail to mhallmark@hot.rr.com I would like to sign it.
Thanks
Marion E. Hallmark
>
>








>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare we’ve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the “America” in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of “generational indoctrination”?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>‘imminent threat’ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>“…rescuing…” is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they can’t do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:25:39 04/13/06 Thu

>Hi Bill;
>I tried to find where to sign the partition about the
>illegal aliens but I could not find the link. If you
>would send me instructions by E-Mail to
>mhallmark@hot.rr.com I would like to sign it.
>Thanks
>Marion E. Hallmark
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>>declare we’ve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>>"What do we have to do to win?"
>>
>>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>>
>>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>>
>>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>>
>>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>>be there at all.
>>
>>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>>believe Allah is down with that.
>>
>>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>>
>>These people are taught from the time they are
>>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>>life on this planet.
>>
>>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>>those who would paint the “America” in a bad light,
>>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>>people wrong things a bad thing?
>>
>>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade
>them.
>>
>>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>>desire...
>>
>>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>>get it.
>>
>>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
>> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>>
>>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>>generation after generation.
>>
>>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>>its ambassador to the United States.
>>
>>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>>depiction, of “generational indoctrination”?
>>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
>> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>>so much receives much support from the common people
>>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>>
>>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>>USA however he could.
>>
>>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>>‘imminent threat’ today, now is it?
>>
>>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>>
>>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>>your complete line of thought there...
>>
>>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>>agreement that both sides can live with.
>>
>>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>>
>>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>>helps that effort.
>>
>>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>>
>>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>>and Syria.
>>
>>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>>manage a danger gas station.
>>
>>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>>
>>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>>
>>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>>operations before they hurt we the people.
>>
>>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>>attack.
>>
>>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>>published.
>>
>>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>>“…rescuing…” is EXACTLY what we need.
>>
>>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>>
>>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>>Ireland?
>>
>>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>>when American lives are at stake.
>>
>>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>>
>>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>>far from a perfect world.
>>
>>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>>
>>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>>worst.
>>
>>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>>
>>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>>
>>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>>anyone anywhere.
>>
>>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>>a lesser extent, Germany.
>>
>>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>>move.
>>
>>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>>have done to hurt America and Israel is
>unconscionable.
>>
>>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>>conscionable.
>>
>>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>>
>>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>>global domination, but rather global market
>>manipulation.
>>
>>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>>
>>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>>causalities.
>>
>>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>>both within the country and abroad.
>>
>>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>>
>>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>>World War III is underway and have little
>>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>>
>>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they can’t do so
>>with our authority and approval.
>>
>>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>>
>>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>>cautious of.
>>
>>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>>strategy."
>>
>>It's us or them.
>>
>>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
>> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>>
>>---
>>
>>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>>and God help your mindless minions.
>>
>>King,
>>North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> [> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:54:36 04/13/06 Thu

The American people are being lied to when they are told that Iran poses a threat to to us.Iran does not pose a threat to the United States. It is all about protecting Israel,why is Israel allowed to have atomic weapons but not Iran? why doesn,t Bush tell Israel to get rid of their atomic bomb stockpile? do you think they would listen to him?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Geronda Jenkins
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:13:31 01/05/06 Thu

>Dear Bill:
>
>I found this piece, supposedly written by you, on the
>web:
>
>"It's The War, Stupid By: Bill O'Reilly for
>BillOReilly.com
>Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003"
>
>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they canˇŻt do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas
Mr. O'Reilly, Im not sure if this will make a difference or mean anything to you or others but I thank you for your show,actually my whole family does. My son who really likes you says hello.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Lloyd Wright - North Port, FL
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:51:58 01/09/06 Mon

>Dear Bill:
>
On your TV broadcast, you mentioned that Harry Belefonte was selected as "Man of the Year" by AARP magazine. His being named for this honor angers me. I am a member of AARP, but I rarely agree with its' political positions. I suspect that a lot of members don't agree with these announced positions I don't know how AARP arrives at their positions, they don't oll the membership to correctly reflect the member's opinion on anything. The officers of AARP should more correctly state that their stated positions reflect those of a small group of AARP officers, not the organization. Perhaps, you could confront the AARP spokesperson about this on your TV show. Thanks for your thought-provoking reporting.
>











>
>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, tha

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Danny Delgado
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:11:01 02/07/06 Tue

Dear Mr. O'reilly,
I use to write to you hoping that my intellect was so rare,that you would invite me on to your show, and that every topic you'd throw at me, be az wood, into my fire. The smoke would be inhaled by viewers, az my logic would overthrow any force opposed.So into my own, now I bloviate with God alone, and even "2b" I forgive.Az a result, I have
said all there iz.Death iz all that left.

On my final BREATH,
Danny DeLgado
Hialeah, FL

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Larry Burns
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:24:44 02/15/06 Wed

>Dear Bill:
>
>I found this piece, supposedly written by you, on the
>web:
>
>"It's The War, Stupid By: Bill O'Reilly for
>BillOReilly.com
>Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003"
>
>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they canˇŻt do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas
Bill
For two days I have listen to the Chenny shooting story. My reaction. I agree with the fox reporter who said tell the congress to get off it's ass and do it's job. I wish the news people would do the same and stop acting like cry babies. Surly there are more important things than this to report.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Congressional smoke and mirrors


Author:
Ed
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:18:49 05/31/06 Wed

While our congress is fretting about the FBI searching for potential criminal activity of one them, the CFR (council on foreign relations) is quietly working toward a Plan to Integrate the US, Mexico, and Canada by 2010 (I read this on eagleforum.org). If true this could explain the lack of action from our elected officials regarding border security.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: FEDERAL GRANT MONIES


Author:
Iona (Cheryl) Kranz
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:45:48 06/22/06 Thu

>Dear Bill:
>
>SUBJ: Federal grant monies

Why does the federal government make it so difficult to access information on federal grants available to its citizens? Websites on federal grants and loans are private and is just a gimmick to buy their info which should be free from the government to its citizens. Just thinking about it bewilders and befuddles me. Why they make it so difficult for something they supposedly are making available for "the people" is completely and utterly mindblowing.

Appreciate any help/info you have for me,
Cheryl Kranz
Mound, MN

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
tommy s (isreael)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:01:22 07/19/06 Wed

>Dear Bill:
>web:
>the muslims fighting isreael is like the u.s.a. declaring war on new jersey......my advise to isreael is to back the palestineians up against the red sea...if allah opens it up for them..they can walk through and become egyptians..if he does not they become dead.....allaha's will be done...and who's to blame allah....tommy s margate fl.......................................................................................................................................................................................

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Travis Erwin (Happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 00:41:40 08/05/06 Sat

Travis Erwin
Pekin,Illinois

Dear Bill,

Congrats to you and Fox News on being one of the highest ranking TV shows in the U.S. I'm Releived to know that there is a news station that tells the TRUTH
It gives me hope that the next President might also be a Conservative and if were luckey that person will be half as good as Regan otherwise were not going to win WORLD WAR III

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:24:28 03/10/08 Mon

>Dear Bill:
>I think the loons in washington have forgotten what it cost to live in the real world today. With high energy prices wages have not kept up. The working class can not afford new homes with everything going up.The loons don t buy anything so they don t know.Trying to force new homes on people that can t afford them should be a sin from the bankers.Tell the washington big shots that yes a recession is here and will be here till wages catch up if ever
August L. Casson
Northport, Fl. 34287
> , >
:
>Bicom>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they canˇŻt do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Coletta Long
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:16:53 04/17/08 Thu

Bill,

I am a white female, 80 years old, have been around for a long time and find it easy to recognize a racist. Your attacking a black minister, 30 years in service, because the church wants to build him a million dollar home is indicative of that. How about white CEO's who are fired from corporations with a 25 millino dollar bouns after 5-6 years of service. Racist is certainly evident here.

Disgusted with your racist rhetoric.

Mrs. Long

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Marge
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:41:51 04/23/08 Wed

>Dear Bill: I have some new words for you to use, possibly.
VOCIFEROUS-vehement insistence in complaints or demands
OBSCURANT-one opposed to the spread of knowledge
HODDYPOLL-fumbling inept or stupid person or
NODDYPOLL-{obscure}
>
>There--am I pithy?
Love ya, Marge
>

>
>

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:58:19 06/12/08 Thu

>Dear Bill:
>
>I found this piece, supposedly written by you, on the
>web:
>
>"It's The War, Stupid By: Bill O'Reilly for
>BillOReilly.com
>Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003"
>
>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they canˇŻt do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:16:12 08/21/08 Thu

>Dear Bill:
>
>I found this piece, supposedly written by you, on the
>web:
>
>"It's The War, Stupid By: Bill O'Reilly for
>BillOReilly.com
>Wednesday, Sep 10, 2003"
>
>*If you DIDN'T write it, please disregard the
>following. However, if you DID, I'd LOVE the
>opportunity to "step up", and debate you over the
>issues at hand. The following is a line by line
>dissection of your wrongness:
>
>For a country smack in the middle of World War III, we
>are certainly a blasîSunch.
>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare weˇŻve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the ˇ°Americaˇ± in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of ˇ°generational indoctrinationˇ±?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>ˇ®imminent threatˇŻ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>ˇ°ˇ­rescuingˇ­ˇ± is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they canˇŻt do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas
fuck u america

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Dr. Betty Haven, Lake City, FL
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:18:43 09/01/08 Mon

>Dear Bill:
>
HOORAY!!! We now have a Brunette invading the bevy of Blonde female TV reporters and dignitaries. Our Sarah Palin has gorgeous brunette tresses, a pleasure to behold.

Betty Haven, a Brunette from Lake City, FL

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Chris Reimers (Stupid Ike fixes)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:40:29 09/16/08 Tue

>Dear Bill:
>You interviewed the Florida head of the Electric Power company [his name is not in my memory files] shortly after Katrina. Your challenge to him to bury electric cables was met with "It's too expensive to replace all the aerial cable". With all the lines down in Louisiana and Texas, I bet that the power companies are racing to replace the aerial cable with same.
Chris Reimers
Marietta, Georgia

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: An e-mail to Bill O'Reilly: oreilly@foxnews.com


Author:
Henry C. Cole - Noblesville, Indiana
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:40:33 10/09/08 Thu

>Dear Bill:
You are on the right track with your comments suggesting that McCain should say "if elected I will get those SOB's etc. keep it up and name names of who got us into this mess. Also I think you should get into this whole "Acorn Organization", Obama's campaign donated $800,000. to Acorn so they could continue to register voters. The normal Press will not do anything about these two items. Keep up the good work.>
>
>">
>*>
>>>
>We're worried about how much fighting the people who
>want to kill us will cost and whether we have an "exit
>strategy" in Iraq.
>
>*Well actually, We just want to know when we can
>declare we’ve 'won' the War. What has to happen so
>that we can declare a moral victory in this conflict?
>I mean who exactly do we have to kill, what capitol
>city do we have to occupy? What we want to know is,
>"What do we have to do to win?"
>
>Craven politicians and crazed columnists are second
>guessing President Bush who, at times, looks like he's
>first guessing the nation's foreign policy.
>
>*Name-calling accomplishes nothing, except to identify
>YOU as a 'name caller'.
>
>Since Mr. Bush, for some inexplicable reason, will not
>spell it out for you it falls on me to do so.
>
>*He CAN'T spell it out for you or me. (no pun
>intended) Because if everyone knew we were in the
>middle east to secure our economic needs, we wouldn't
>be there at all.
>
>There are around the world thousands of Islamic
>fanatics who want to kill Americans because they
>believe Allah is down with that.
>
>*There ARE in THIS country THOUSANDS of individuals
>who preach hate and violence against someone or some
>group. Some of them have bombed buildings and killed
>innocent Americans. But we don't 'dismantle' their
>organizations. We hold 'individuals' accountable for
>the crimes they commit. Look at how 'violent' the KKK
>has PROVEN itself to be. Its political jargon is no
>less vile, or "evil" than it was years ago, so why is
>IT allowed to exist still to poison young minds?
>
>These people are taught from the time they are
>children that Jews and Americans are undeserving of
>life on this planet.
>
>*So, what!? They 'think' there are evil people in the
>world, and that evil ways will lead to hell. Aren't
>YOU saying the same thing about them, right now? Who
>cares if I 'think' YOU don't deserve a T.V. show? It
>isn't until I ACT to rid you of it, that I am guilty
>of some crime. I thought Americans were FREE to read,
>learn, and THINK about anything they wish??? Are
>those who would paint the “America” in a bad light,
>suddenly not allowed to do so? Since when is teaching
>people wrong things a bad thing?
>
>There is no negotiation with the most of these
>zealots; there is nothing one can say to dissuade them.
>
>*Dissuade them from what? THINKING the way they do,
>or ACTING they way they do? You see, the two are
>completely different pursuits. Indeed, there is
>nothing you can do to dissuade someone from THINKING
>something, but you CAN deter them from ACTING out
>those beliefs. If the kid reaches for the cookie jar,
>after you said no. Then you hit him hard across his
>knuckles with a wooden spoon. If he does it again,
>you cut his hand off and make stew out of it.
>Eventually the kid gets the idea, so he STOPS reaching
>for the cookie jar. However, in his head he still
>WANTS & desires the holdings inside the cookie jar.
>AND indeed, there IS nothing you can do to dissuade
>desire...
>
>They want blood and they will use any and all means to
>get it.
>
>*Well, they want 'specific blood', not just ANY blood.
> And indeed, they WILL use any means necessary.
>
>A number of nations help these killers and allow the
>murderous anti-American indoctrination to continue
>generation after generation.
>
>Iran, Indonesia, Syria, and Saudi Arabia are the most
>threatening to us, although the Saudis do have some
>pro-American government officials like Prince Bandar,
>its ambassador to the United States.
>
>*WAIT a second, hold the truck! You can't just name
>off a few countries and especially gloss over Saudi
>Arabia like that. "Anti-American indoctrination to
>continue"...? What does that mean exactly? I mean is
>there ANYTHING about America that isn't 'perfect'?
>And if a father tells his son in China, that to desire
>the life of a billionaire is folly, does THAT fit your
>depiction, of “generational indoctrination”?
>MOREOVER, you didn't even mention what Saudi Arabia
>really represents, in this global formula. Look, I am
>going to break it down for you- We get cheap oil from
>a Monarchy in the Saudi Family. The common people are
>taught hate toward America, and oppression toward
>women, but they want to throw off the shackles of this
> Oppressive Monarchy. We are literally guarding the
>palaces and oil fields in Arabia,. However our oil
>needs are oblivious to the masses needs therein.
>Osama bin Laden was cast OUT of Arabia because of his
>fighting for the rights of the common people, and in
>so much receives much support from the common people
>in the region. 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi
>Arabia, and if you'll read the 9-11 Commission report,
>you can see where the country "Saudi Arabia" was
>blacked out. And WHERE is North Korea on that list???
>
>Iraq used to be a terrorist enabler primarily by
>helping the homicide bombers kill civilians in Israel
>but Saddam Hussein was open to causing trouble for the
>USA however he could.
>
>*I'd like you to provide ANY evidence that Saddam EVER
>attacked us directly. Not liking us and invading a
>neighboring country years ago, isn't exactly an
>‘imminent threat’ today, now is it?
>
>The Islamic killers thrive on the Palestinian
>situation. As long as the Palestinians are denied a
>state of their own, the propaganda machine that
>demonizes Israel and America will roll along
>unchallenged in the Arab world.
>
>*They "thrive"...? Is this like saying that
>anti-inner-city initiative republicans "thrive" on
>seeing low test scores, that allow them to close down
>schools? OR are you saying that 'some people' just
>love to fight, and will do so anytime they see an
>injustice or conflict arise? I just don't understand
>your complete line of thought there...
>
>So the only way to break down the hatred many Arabs
>have toward us is to forge a Palestinian-Israeli peace
>agreement that both sides can live with.
>
>*Actually, this is only PART of the problem, and even
>if we succeed in doing so there will still be
>anti-American sentiments alive and well.
>
>In order for Israel to cooperate in this effort fully,
>it needs to feel secure. Having the Americans in Iraq
>helps that effort.
>
>*How the hell do you feel secure in the tender-box
>that is the middle east, during WWIII??? You DON'T.
>Since we have been in Iraq, how many bombing has
>Israel suffered. is that number greater or smaller
>than the number BEFORE the invasion and occupation?
>
>Also, the USA needs a democratic outpost in the Middle
>East to put pressure on the terrorist states of Iran
>and Syria.
>
>*I'll give them this, an 'artificial target' in the
>middle east isn't necessarily a bad idea, but it will
>NEVER be a democratic outpost. At best, we will only
>manage a danger gas station.
>
>A foothold in that region makes it infinitely more
>difficult for Al Qaeda to carry out its evil doing.
>
>*Actually, it HELPS them to garner support, because
>they have evidence in their very country that we are
>not only invaders, but occupiers.
>
>Just the huge CIA presence in Iraq alone, gives the
>USA a major advantage in learning about terrorist
>operations before they hurt we the people.
>
>*I think you are wrong. You can't stop someone will
>to give their life for a cause if they are properly
>motivated and trained. ALL that you can hope to do is
>catch them, and try NOT to allow them to repeat an
>attack.
>
>This nonsense about the United Nations rescuing
>America in Iraq is something Aesop would have
>published.
>
>*Hey, when you wanna take on the world, and defy its
>global institutions, then you gotta put up, or shut
>up. WE said WE were going with or without the UN into
>Iraq. Now mis-planning, and improper public relations
>has us somewhere we don't want to be, alone. If
>someone DOESN'T help us, we will not succeed.
>“…rescuing…” is EXACTLY what we need.
>
>The UN is a chaotic chamber with no sense of urgency
>about terrorism and no sympathy towards the USA.
>
>*Could or would you apply that sentiment to the U.S.,
>in regards to the needs of other nations, also?
>Meaning that WE are a member of that chaotic chamber.
>Do you mean to say that WE don't have a sense of
>urgency about the terrorist attacks that occur, say in
>Ireland?
>
>Now some of that antipathy might be justified but not
>when American lives are at stake.
>
>*They ARE at stake. American lives are at stake each
>day, but not from terrorist attacks. A brief look at
>the numbers show us to be in far greater danger from
>car accidents caused by drunk drivers, than almost
>anything else, besides Cancer. I mean in the last 10
>years, less than 5,000 people have been victims of
>international terrorism. Last year alone 18,000
>innocent people DIED from drunk drivers. What are we
>actively doing to save those lives next year, aren't
>THOSE lives "at stake"???
>
>In a perfect world, all countries that aid and abet
>terrorism would be isolated and embargoed. But this is
>far from a perfect world.
>
>*This is NOT a perfect world, that I agree with.
>However, I DISAGREE with you, in that I think that
>even if we DID manage to force everyone to think like
>us, we would have only created a more imperfect world.
>
>The failure of France, Germany, Russia and China to
>aggressively help America neutralize terror states is
>an outrage of historic proportions. France is the
>worst.
>
>*Okay, if everyone in the world thinks you are wrong,
>but you think you are right, what does that make you?
>I mean, if you weighed the People's Opinion in the
>U.K. you'd see that they aren't with us either. In
>fact, HALF of America isn't with you. So if ALL these
>people,(I hesitate to say 75% of the world) are
>against you, what makes you think you are right???
>"...neutralize terror states"...? What if I told you
>that many nations view the U.S. as a terror state?
>
>The Chirac government lied to Secretary of State Colin
>Powell about enforcing the UN resolution demanding
>Saddam cooperate with the weapons inspectors.
>
>*It would seem that lies are not an uncommon thing to
>anyone anywhere.
>
>Then France actively undermined both the war and the
>occupation. President Bush should level with the
>American people about the duplicity of France and, to
>a lesser extent, Germany.
>
>*So you want our leaders to actively work to further
>separate ourselves from life long allies...? With all
>due respect, "You are an idiot." We live in a global
>community, we can't afford to shun neighbors who can't
>move.
>
>I know this would cause an uproar by what the French
>have done to hurt America and Israel is unconscionable.
>
>*"..unconscionable..."...? Okay, YOU don't get to use
>that word! Everything is conscionable. We lock
>people up in this country for smoking cannabis as
>medicine, and then federally subsidize tobacco farmers
>to be THE leading cause of Cancer in this country.
>When it comes to economic gain, ANYTHING is
>conscionable.
>
>At the same time, the Bush administration must begin
>earnestly persuading nations that are not overtly
>hostile to us that we don't want to dominate the
>world, we want to make it safe for everyone.
>
>*No, we DO want to dominate the world, And we want to
>use our military to unbalance the free market, by
>aligning ourselves in strategic locations that insure
>us access to cheap oil and labor. It isn't really
>global domination, but rather global market
>manipulation.
>
>Finally, World War III is unlike any war in history
>and mistakes will be made in the fighting of it.
>
>*Ahem, mistaked HAVE been made, and will continue to
>be made. Just hope that YOU aren't one of the
>causalities.
>
>The Bush administration has the correct global view
>regarding terrorism but poor communications skills
>both within the country and abroad.
>
>*"...poor communication skills..."...? Don't you mean
>they LIE, and hide their real agendas?
>
>The sad truth is that most people don't even know that
>World War III is underway and have little
>understanding of the strategies and stakes.
>
>*The sad truth is that too many Americans get their
>'news' from entertainers like YOU. The sad truth is
>that although we are the free-est nation in the world,
>we are also the most ignorant and uninformed.
>Americans don't see the world outside of their
>immediate environment, and have little to no concept
>of the international world or market. Look, I am a
>well-informed, partially educated, fully informed,
>Patriotic American. 'I' know that my Liberty and
>Freedom are only in danger from those citizens who
>would trade Liberty for Security. America isn't a
>building or a person. It is an idea, and ideas can't
>be defeated. We are Free, to think, read, and write
>whatever we want. The only people who can take away
>these Freedoms are Our Lawmakers, and they can’t do so
>with our authority and approval.
>
>But believe me, you and your family are in danger. We
>must stop the partisan bickering and acknowledge that
>brain-washed fanatics have us in their sights.
>
>*The only sincere danger we Americans face has already
>struck me. I am in a wheelchair now, for the rest of
>my life, because of a drunk driver. And 'I' think YOU
>are the "brain-washed fanatic" that we should all be
>cautious of.
>
>And this time there's no Geneva Convention and no
>limits on deadly weaponry. This time there is no "exit
>strategy."
>
>It's us or them.
>
>*Hey, all that I have to say is that when you or
>anyone else comes into MY home, then we have a
>problem. And if ever you DO try to come into MY home,
>I've already got your "exit strategy" waiting for you.
> Keep reaching for the cookie jar, my friend, and
>pretty soon you are gonna come back without an arm.
>
>---
>
>THIS is why I DON'T watch "the Factor" with any kind
>of regularity. You'll go off on a mis-characterizing
>spiel, and 'program' a bunch of dumb wannabe beltway
>intellectuals, to think like you. Then you refuses to
>allow anyone 'qualified' to rebut your findings. I
>have written scores of letters and e-mails to you,
>asking & pleading for the opportunity to "step up" and
>debate you. I'll bet I've been doing so for at least 2
>years...and in return NOTHING. Not a single word in
>response to what must be a mounded pile of paper
>outside your offices. My rule is that if you don't
>respond, I don't watch or listen. F-you, you coward,
>and God help your mindless minions.
>
>King,
>North Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: ABOUT THE TROOPS


Author:
KAY
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:00:52 10/08/08 Wed

Does our country realize that we will have to fight the war on U.S. soil if we don't finish the war in Iraq?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: MCCAIN AND OBAMA


Author:
A CONCERN CITIZEN (very unhappy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 05:45:57 10/08/08 Wed

Bill
iI HAVE WATCH THE NEWS ON DEBATES FOLLOWING IT CLOSE ..I FEEL THAT PEOPLE ARE MAKING OBAMA OUT OF SOME KIND OF GOD AND BELIEVE ME....HE IS NOT GOD I FEEL THAT PEOPLE IS NOT LOOKING AT WHAT MCCAIN CAN DO FOR AMERICAN ...PEOPLE SHOULD READ THE BIBLE AND THEY WILL SEE WHAT I AM TALKING ABOUT ..IT TALKS ABOUT THE ANTI-CHRIST AND HOW HE IS GOING TO DECEIVE MANY AND PEOPLE GOING TO THINK HE IS A PEICE MAKER.AND MANY ARE GOING TO FOLLOW HIM OBAMA HAS FLIP FLOP ON SO MANY ISSUES ....LAST NIGHT ON THE DEBATE AT ONE POINT I FELT THAT OBAMA GOT MADE AT WHAT MCCAIN SAID ..THAT THEY TOLD THEM THEY HAD A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME AND THEY TRY TO GO ON BUT OBAMA SAID NO LET ME SAY WHAT I WANT TO SAY...THEN MCCAIN SAID HE WANTED THE SAME THROUGH OUT THE DEBATE OBAMA STOP THEN HAD A LOOK ON HIS FACE LIKE HE DID NOT NO WHAT TO SAY THEN HE SPOKE...........THIS IS MY THOUGHT ON OBAMA .......FLIP FLOP OH' WHAT A RELIEF IT IS WHEN JOHN MCCAIN BECOME PRESIDENT WHAT A RELIEF IT WILL BE TO NO THAT WE HAVE SOMEONE THAT NO WHAT GOING ON...AND NO WHAT ARE VETS NEED BECAUSE HE BEEN THERE HE KNOWS ABOUT THE WARS OBAMA HAS NOT BEEN IN THE ARMY OR NAVY OR MARINES .....AND ON SARA PALIN I THINK SHE IS A SMART WOMAN AND SHE LIVED AND BEEN IN MANY THINGS THAT AMERICAN PEOPLE HAS GONE THROUGH AND THIS WOMAN TINA THAT EVERYBODY SAID SHE LOOKS LIKE HER SHE DOES MAYBE SARA MOTHER HAD TWINS AND SHE KEEP THE GOOD ONE AND GAVE THE BAD ONE AWAY......BECAUSE TINA YOU STINK YOU MAKE A LIVING OFF OF SOMEONE ELSE BECAUSE YOU DO NOT HAVE A GOOD HEAD ON YOUR SHOULDER LIKE SARA PALIN GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO GET A REAL JOB TINA BECAUSE YOU STINK ......AND BILL I THINK YOU ARE A GOOD PERSON YOU STAND UP AGAINST WHAT IS RIGHT AND WHAT IS WRONG KEEP IT UPPPPPPPP......HANITY AND COMBS COMBS YOU STINK MAYBE YOU AND TINA COULD GET A SHOW TOGEATHER HANITY YOU ARE A GO GETTER KEEP IT UPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Election 08


Author:
James Handy
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:54:01 10/06/08 Mon

Mr. O'reilly, is it safe to say that if you're not talking about the issues of the day, you don't have a platform to present to te american people?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: barney franks


Author:
chuck pearson (happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:18:26 10/03/08 Fri

Bill ,thanks for telling that big bag of wind barney franks what the american people think of him !now can you take care of nancy pelossi,she is everything that is bad about america, thanks for looking out for us !

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: prejudiced???


Author:
ginny from barryville new york (outraged)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:15:05 10/02/08 Thu

THE MODERATOR OF THE DEBATE WROTE A CHAPTER IN HER BOOK EXTOLLING OBAMA---HOW FAIR IS THAT TO SARAH!!!!!! ALSO, JUST A NOTE---THE "WOMEN" (NOTE THE QUOTATION MARKS) ON THE VIEW ARE IGNORANT.THEY TALK ABOUT NOTHING AND MAKE FUN OF A GOV.--HOW SICK IS THAT.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Interview of Palin


Author:
Elaine
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:02:02 09/26/08 Fri

As you suggested, I would also like to see Gov. Sarah Palin interviewed on the O'Reilly Factor. Katy Couric asked Gov. Palin a question about McCain's record that Couric could have simply looked up for herself wasting time that could have been spent asking productive questions that Americans would like to hear. Why the big effort by some of the media to ask Gov. Palin pointless questions they hope she cannot answer? Then they wonder why she doesn't give more interviews. I am confident the O'Reilly Factor would ask questions of Sarah Palin that the American public would actually like to hear discussed. From my observation of Sarah Palin, she ACTUALLY answers the questions asked of her, rather than doing the "side step" into left field. Just a word about something I see often during an interview with some Democrat leaders. When asked a question, they begin to laugh, shake their heads, avoid the question, and make some crude and unfounded comment about Senator McCain. Anyone else noticed that?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Earmarks


Author:
Karole
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:49:05 09/26/08 Fri

What in the world is Biden doing adding 30 mil in earmarks for his state of Delaware when he is asking all of us to pay for this bailout???????? I am outraged that any EARMARK by any lawmaker would be tacked on to this bailout plan at our expense. This has to stop.!!!! All of them need to stop this madness.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: O'Reilly's books


Author:
Barb. Nimey (O'Reilly's oldest fan!!!)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 12:47:31 09/19/08 Fri

You are the greatest!! I have read all your books, and given them as Christmas , presents. Even your first book. I'm looking forward to reading your most recent one. Keep up the good work for all us people who look for the truth, in our govenment and those who up hold their faith in serving. God Bless America and pray for all those who serve in our Miltary. You are the fare and balance of Fox News.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: do nothing congress


Author:
ron grim conyers ga (you angry???? heres more)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 00:36:08 09/18/08 Thu

this do nothing congress comes back to lower our opinion of them. they give us a drilling for oil bill, take away states revenue sharing, drill no closer than 50 miles, and expect us to accept this as a nonpartisan attempt to get energy independance. what a sham the dems are. anyone who would vote for a democrat has as archie bunker says has got to be a "meat head". wake up out there.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obama/Ayres


Author:
Connie/Retired Teacher
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:46:33 09/09/08 Tue

During your interview with Barack Obama tonight(09/09) , something was said about Obama and Ayres working on some education issues. Why didn't you ask him about the Chicago Annenberg Challenge? Doesn't that have something to do with implementing communism in the classroom?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obama


Author:
Andrew Larsen (fed up)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 16:37:10 09/09/08 Tue

Dear Bill: Why are you and the media not talking about O'Bamas record here in Illinois? Illinois has the highest taxes of any state in the USA not to mention the highest sales taxes. Yet while serving has a state legislature here O'Bama never spoke up to the Democratic governor nor his machine buddies to lower our taxes! As our state senator he has dome nothing to helo lower our taxes not has he did anything! He talks about change but he was not concern about change here in Illinois while serving our state. Not to mention he cared less about all the corruption in our state which is controlled bu his own party! I hope you shall inform America of these facts! Thank you!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Sarah Palin


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:25:35 09/09/08 Tue

You and the Democrats are asking for an interview right now, just a few days after being the VP pick. As you remeber Obama was not taking interviews for several months after starting his primary drive and took him over six months to give you an interview. My God give her a break.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: ACORN and Obama


Author:
bob kotsis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:36:28 09/07/08 Sun

With the latest voter corruption over "your" favorite state Wesconsin which involved ACORN, when is someone going to show Obama's involvement with these wack-jobs who have been corrupting the voting process for years. He has served on their Board and has procured grants and loans for them. As one of the prosecutors from WI stated on Fox this morning, "these people (ACORN) go from stste to state doing this same thing." It's no wonder WI carried the DEMONcrats for the last five election cycles. Sic um Bill

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Rep. Party


Author:
Dena (Disgusted)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:53:46 09/06/08 Sat

Your blatant republicanism is nauseating.
The fat in Dick Morris' face is fogging his brain.
McCain is a liar- if he previously knew about the Palin girl's pregancy, he should have pre-empted the exposure- cut them off at the pass- before it got to be news.
Sarah Palin compared herself to a pitbull. Pitbulls are a menace to the world and should be outlawed.

BAH! TO THE "CULTURE WARRIOR".

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Body Language segment


Author:
Sandy Blackstone from Ohio (Tired of Liberals)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:47:06 09/05/08 Fri

I'm a regular listener to Fox News (can't bear to listen to any other because of the liberal rheteric), and also your program Bill. I appreciate all of you so much. However, I have a problem with your Body Language segment on your program. Anyone can tell this lady is a liberal, and it showed very plainly tonight. She said Sarah Palin showed an arrogance. I thought Sarah Palin was absolutely wonderful ! We, out here in middle America, finally have an eloquent voice speaking for us, and she did it with confidence, humor, and strength. Wow ! She is something, and it is rediculous to say she had arrogance. Then she said John McCain shouldn't hold his hands in front of him, and should hold his arms behind him. Did she ever consider that possibly it is uncomfortable for him to hold his arms behind himself due to his injuries during his captivity in the war !! Good grief, leave the man alone. I find no problem with how he stands, or if he plays with his wedding ring. I do that myself. He is an honorable, humble, kind, and gutsy man, and a hero in my book. THEN, she said she just loved Obama's reaching out and trying to touch you. It showed his wanting to communicate. I thought it just showed he was trying to get you to listen to him, instead of him listening to you. It's all on the way you look at it. She's biased, and I think it really showed tonight. Thanks for hearing me out Bill.
God bless you and all of Fox news. Keep up the fair and balanced, but especially keep up the tough.

Sandy from Ohio

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: McCain putting his hands behind his back


Author:
Elaine Manis - Carlsbad, CA (observant)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:53:15 09/05/08 Fri

The body language segment said that McCain should put his hands behind his back. Don't you get it? He can't! Due to his injuries he can't lift his arms above his shoulders and I am quite sure it would be too uncomfortable to put them behind his back.

Give him a break on this one.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obauma's visit to OReilly Thurs. Sept 4


Author:
Josephine Jones (Very sad)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:16:01 09/03/08 Wed

I was deeply upset to hear that you will have Obauma on your show Thurs. Sept. 4. I do not object your having him on, what I do object is that he used you and said "sure I will come on your show, but on Thurs. Sept 4. How evil it is that he would want to come on then when McCain will be having his speech. I can't believe that you were taken in like this, you are much smarter than that. I am 80 yrs old, have a large family and your show is a household word. We listen to you every nite. If Obauma is on, then I feel you let us all down. Make it another day. My heart is broken over this news. Thank you. Josephine Jones

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: palin


Author:
donna platt
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:11:46 09/03/08 Wed


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Gaza Arabs Back Obama's Election


Author:
steve (Angry)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:59:50 09/02/08 Tue

Dear Bill
I am a regular reader of the Jerusalem Post found at WWW.KolIsrael.com. There is a short movie about Gaza Arabs calling American homes at random suggesting that these Americans contacted support Obama for President.
Please show your audience this short film.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: PALIN NOT FIT FOR VP


Author:
JOHN PALESTIS (IT'S SAD)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:22:05 09/01/08 Mon

THE APPLE DON'T FALL FAR FROM THE TREE. IF YOU CAN'T RUN YOUR HOUSE , HOW CAN YOU RUN THE COUNTRY? SHE WAS A HO AND THATS WHY HER DAUGHTER IS. BILL IF THIS WAS OBAMA DAUGHTER YOU WOULD BE ALL OVER HIM. MCCAIN PICKED HER SO THAT HE CAN HAVE HIS OWN PERSONAL HO.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Karl Rove


Author:
Dena P. (Disgusted)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:10:42 08/30/08 Sat

You frequently have Karl Rove on your program giving his opinion.
Rove is a liar, a pig and a disgrace to the American people. By exposing Ambassador Wilson's wife as a government spy, Rove and Scooter Libby will be responsible for the welfare of future ambassadors wives. All wives will be considered spies.
I dare the "culture warrior" to put this on his program!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Hillary as repub VP


Author:
Travis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:47:24 08/26/08 Tue

I think Obama has lost his mind but thats another story. I support John Mccain and I think he needs to pick Hillary as his VP..not only would this show Bipartisanship between parties but he would get all of her votes as well

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: why did they spit in our faces and the graves of our nations fallen heros


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:28:05 08/23/08 Sat

the gold medelist of the beach vollyball and the gold ,silver and bronz medelist of track and field sipt in our face and on the graves of our nations fallen heros,by not putting there right hand over there hearts when the national anthum was played,as a inactive marine and a citizen of the united states of america i feel our faces were spit in by the medelist,i think when they return from the olympic games the should be escorted to arlengton where they can physically spit on the graves of our real heros,the medelist may be olympic heros but no real hero spits in there nations face

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Stephen Corsi


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:09:39 08/14/08 Thu

Bill,
You just labeled Stephen Corsi a pinhead for embracing 9/11 conspiracy theories. Tomorrow, the Obama supporters will use your words, "Corsi is a pinhead" attributing them as a reference to Corsi's book. You can preempt this attempt.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: great fan of yours


Author:
Eileen
[Edit]

Date Posted: 00:09:47 08/07/08 Thu

My favorite sections of your show --is Miller Time-- I love the repore between you two and its nice to see you laugh with each other. The other is Body Language, I wish it was a little longer.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Re: Women farting on cakes for sexual fetish


Author:
kevin k demasky
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:47:43 08/05/08 Tue

>http://www.cakefart.com
>
>I wish all the young, sexy-looking girls on this forum
>to come over to
>my house, take off their pants, place their asses near
>my birthday
>cake, and fart vigorously their anal gas on it.
>
>I would like to fantasize about it, the raunchy
>smells, how long a
>fart lasted, the asses squatting on my cake.
>
>A competition between farting females is also been
>taken into account.
>Their feminine crack may produce the combo of gas
>station and rotten
>eggs aromas are the ones taking the cake.
>
>Randy
>
>P.S. For raunchy scents and prolonged effects you may
>abstain from
>taking a dump for 2 days so the fart smell will be the
>"worst".
>
>#2: I got inspired at a nudist beach at Southern
>France: I was riding
>the bus holding a birthday cake, when a lady standing
>next to me
>released her noxious gas right on the cake.
>
>#3: In case a woman dares to fart on the candles, what
>do you expect
>to happen next - will it light her farts or blow the
>candles with her
>warm wet raunchy loud fart?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Big Oil Profits


Author:
No name (courious)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:38:47 08/04/08 Mon

Bill; You keep talking about oil co. profits in terms of the "billions" they are making. I would like to hear you discuss the earnings in terms of "profit margin." How do the margins compare with other mega businesses in our economy?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Re: Being Truckulent


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:06:36 08/04/08 Mon

>>Hello Bill,
>>
>>When I heard you mention the word "truckulent" last
>>night, I looked it up in my dictionary. The word means
>>to be fierce or aggressive. I would say that you are
>>being very truckulent, especially when relating to the
>>Cashman War.
>>
>>Tommie Pennebaker
>>Clute, Tx 77531>Hello Bill,
>
>When I heard you mention the word "truckulent" last
>night, I looked it up in my dictionary. The word means
>to be fierce or aggressive. I would say that you are
>being very truckulent, especially when relating to the
>Cashman War.
>
>Tommie Pennebaker
>Clute, Tx 77531

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Work with Data Entry Companies (1137)


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:45:12 07/30/08 Wed

Work with Data Entry Companies. Type basic transcripts, Fill simple marketing forms, PPC Data entry , Ad submitters , Web researchers, Paid Surveys , Paid Shopping , Paid Driving, Paid Blogging , Paid email/surfing, Telecommuting Jobs , Several other entry level positions. Free E-books, Scripts & Software's. Get $25 Signup Bonus. Plus FREE Lifetime Updates. Please visit :- http://www.clicknearn.net/idevaffiliate/a/1137.php?page=26

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: blooter definition


Author:
Dolores Miller
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:01:42 07/29/08 Tue

Good morning, Bill,

One definition of "blooter" is, "to hit something hard". The other is Scottish for "a drunk".

Have a wonderful day!

Dolores Miller
Pensacola, Florida

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: To My dearest Friend and Hero BILL OREILLY my heart goes to our great man and hero TONY SNOW


Author:
TIRDAD GHARIB
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:01:51 07/13/08 Sun

Hello dear Bill Oreilly my dearest friend and hero I wanted to let you know how saddened I was when I learned the news about our superbe Hero Tony Snow a great man may god bless his soul forever Rest in peace My dear friend and my dear american hero Tony Snow we are all going to be with you one day, when lord asks us to join him AMEN Tirdad gharib wwww.pahlaviforkingdom.com

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Senator Edward Kennedy


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:58:00 07/11/08 Fri

Dear Mr. O'Reilly,
I'm wondering if you have or plan to do anything (Talking points) or (Pinheads or Patriots) to recognize what we all witnessed this week in the U.S. Senate regarding Sen. Kennedy.....Whether one agrees with his politics or not, he showed us what we want in our elected officials.....To have a cancer treatment in the morning and then fly to Washington to cast an important vote was simply stated remarkable.......We wish the Senator well and hope you'll recognize him to your viewers.
Thank You.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: BILL OREILLY A HERO IN FOX JOHN McCAIN A TRUE AMERICAN HERO ,


Author:
TIRDAD GHARIB (VERY HAPPY)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:58:53 06/22/08 Sun

My dear Americans: first we have to thank Fox To have a great hero Name Bill Oreilly, then we have to be so proud to have Senator John McCain a true American hero to be our next President Of our greatest Nation on earth in 2009 the USA. We can not have Mr Obama Barack (Hussain) in the white house why??? The only reason is because He mentioned that he wants a dialougue with Irans Tehrans terrorist Islamic Regime whom Iran Mr Ahmadinejad and their gang of mafia revoulutionnary guards are killing our innocent us troops in iraq supporting and funding the terrorist party of Hezbollah, Hamass,building nukes to use it against America and Israel and europe, Can we Trust Mr Barack Obama wanting a dialougue way before even he would like to become President?????? Think My dear Fellow American friends when you go to the polls think please vote John McCain to have a safe America To have insurance for americans,a great economy, low taxes and listen to this: he is against torture even though he was tortured,and being a pow for 5 years God bless all of you my dear fellow Americans,www.pahlaviforkingdom.com is dedicated to Prince Shahriar Shafigh who wanted to overthrow the regime of the cruel mollahs in 1979,. The ayatollah khomeini and their gangs who took our american hostages in 1979 and was asasinated in 1981 in paris france by the irannian mollahs. who released the American hostages??? President Ronald Reagan did why are we where we are now because Of former President Jimmy Carter, who overthrew the late Shah of iran and replaced Khomeini and their gangs God bless America God bless our us troops and god bless all of you.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obama to Iraq to visit troops


Author:
Bob Kotsis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:36:51 06/03/08 Tue

Dear Mr. O'Reilly:

With all of the hype over Obama thinking of going to Iraq to visit the troops, I have another solution for him and maybe you can confront him will this idea. He needs to read Frank Schaeffer's book "Faith of Our Sons".

If you haven't had the privilege of reading this book, you need to read it and have the author on your show at this critical time when the "privileged" of this country have no idea what sacrifices our troops are making. The saddest part of this book is refealing the dismal benefits that the survivors of our fallen "Heroes" receive for the loss of their love ones.

Keep sticking it to the liberals!!!!!!!

Bob Kotsis

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Barrack Obama


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:49:22 05/15/08 Thu

Bill, Obama's voting record, while he was in the Illinois legislature, should provide you with all the information you need to know about this lightweight. His current voting record, which should also be easy to read is miniscule considering his absence. He would be an unknown if former Gov. Edgar or Chicago Bear Mike Ditka had run against him. I'm a Cardinal fan. You definitely have a patriotic singing voice. Phil C. Athens, Il.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Republicans


Author:
Edward J. Cooper
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:18:14 05/13/08 Tue

Mr OReilly, what concerns me as a moderate Republican, which most people consider an extinct species,is that the "base" would like the few of us who remain to disappear. If that happens, the Republican Party will eventually deservedly suffer the same fate as the Whigs

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Votes against the U.S.


Author:
Doyle Davis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:07:10 05/08/08 Thu

1st time writing Bill, long time listner. Got the following thru e-mail. You probably already know this. Don't make fun of my speelig. LOL

How they vote in the United Nations
Below are the actual voting records of various Arabic/Islamic States which are recorded in both the US State Department and United Nations records:

Kuwait votes against the United States 67% of the time

Qatar votes against the United States 67% of the time

Morocco votes against the United States 70% of the time

United Arab Emirates votes against the U.S. 70% of the time.

Jordan votes against the United State s 71% of the time.

Tunisia votes against the United States 71% of the time.

Saudi Arabia votes against the United States 73% of the time.

Yemen votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Algeria votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Oman votes against the United States 74% of the time.

Sudan votes against the United States 75% of the time.

Pakistan votes against the United States 75% of the time.

Libya votes against the United States 76% of the time.

Egypt votes against the United States 79% of the time.

Lebanon votes against the United States 80% of the time.

India votes against the United State s 81% of the time.

Syria votes against the United State s 84% of the time.

Mauritania votes against the United States 87% of the time.

U S Foreign Aid to those that hate us:

Egypt, for example, after voting 79% of the time against the United States, still receives $2 billion annually in US Foreign Aid.

Jordan votes 71% against the United States
And receives $192,814,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

Pakistan votes 75% against the United States
Receives $6,721,000 annually in US Foreign Aid.

India votes 81% against the United States
Receives $143,699,000 annually.

Perhaps it is time to get out of the UN and give the tax savings back to the American workers who are having to skimp and sacrifice to pay the taxes (and gasoline).

Pass this along to every taxpaying citizen you know.

Disgusting isn't it?

"The more educated citizens are about our judicial system, the safer our community!"

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obama's sponsored bill Global Proverty Act (S.2433)


Author:
Hank (Appaled)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:36:35 05/05/08 Mon

Please comment on Obama's sponsored Global Poverty Act which may cost U.S. Tax Payers $845,000,000,000.00. Yes thats $845 Billion. It may hit the Senate this week??

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Poem


Author:
Rose Dignam (Happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:44:45 03/28/08 Fri

There is this guy, Bill
He seeks truth, val to hill

He uses his power of phycology,
to ferret out bovine scatology

Persist as you will,
to put it over on Bill

But you'll be the one,
who speaks the apology.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: NBC Peau de Soie Tour Jacket for SALE


Author:
Mephostopholis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 05:53:15 09/19/06 Tue

Anyone want to buy a MINT Howard Stern NBC Peau de Soie Shave Cream Tour Jacket?..Let me know

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: NBC Peau de Soie Tour Jacket for SALE


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:48:51 03/17/08 Mon

>Anyone want to buy a MINT Howard Stern NBC Peau de
>Soie Shave Cream Tour Jacket?..Let me know
What size and how much?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: NBC Peau de Soie Tour Jacket for SALE


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:40:30 03/25/08 Tue

I dest the flavor of mint.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Obama


Author:
No name (Concerned)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 19:30:09 03/21/08 Fri

I would like to know a few things about Obama:
1. Is his mother Ann an atheist?
2. Was the second man she married a Muslim?
3. Did Obama go to school in Indonesia at age 6? and was one a catholic one but the other a Muslim school?
4. When sworn into office, did Obama use the Bible or the Koran?
5. Does Obama place his hand over his heart when reciting the Pledge of Allegiance; does he recite it? does he face the American flag?
Thanks so much; the answers mean alot to me and the American people. Can these questions or rumors or truth be discussed in the media please?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Where's Michelle


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:44:21 03/05/08 Wed

How come Michelle Malkin does not appear on Bill's show anymore. I hope it is not because Michelle came down real tough on illegal immigrants in her remark that she would report any illegals living in her neighborhood. Please bring Michelle back.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: death count during President's term


Author:
Ed Paton (Sunny Ed)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:22:31 02/27/08 Wed

Dear Bill,
I think the American people need to know the one fact which never get reported and I was surprised myself. Sadly military deaths, a lot of Americans think badly of the war because of the number of deaths of brave and honorable soldiers who has given their lives depending our country in Iraq War. Sadly, the number is currently around 7,600.

But during the Clinton administration, we lost 14,000 military deaths and not word has been said about it. Why? My information come from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/RL32492.pdf

Thank for the information your show shares with us every night.

Ed Paton
Naples Florida

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Need Videos of Howard TV!!


Author:
Greg
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:10:01 10/21/07 Sun

I need help getting some tapes or DVD's of Howard TV as my cable company doesn't carry Howard TV. I have over 1000 90 minutes audio cassettes of the show from the terrestrial days that I could trade to someone who can help me get some Howard TV Shows. Please email me at jmhartna@telusplanet.net if you can help me. Thanks.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: For your Attention,


Author:
Ogbuji Mike Chambers
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:00:01 10/20/07 Sat

For your Attention,

Sequel to your non-response to my earlier letter to you
on behalf of the Trustees and Executors to the Will of our late
client. I wish to notify you that your name is listed as a beneficiary
to the total sum of 2,600, 000.00GBP (Two million six hundred thousand
British pounds) in the codicil and last testament of the deceased.
Until his death he was a major shareholder in big companies, which
include textile and construction companies.

He was a very great philanthropist during his lifetime. He
died on 9th January 2004 at the age of 68.He was buried on the 3rd of
February. Even though he was a foreigner living and working here he
requested before his death that he be buried here in his words, "I
regard here as my home and the people as my people"

I therefore reckoned that you could receive these funds as
you are qualified by your name identity. All the legal papers will be
processed on your response. In your acceptance of this deal, we
request that you kindly forward to us your current telephone and fax
numbers and contact address to enable us file necessary documents at
our high court probate division for the release of this sum of money.

Reply me on this e mail (mike_ogbuji_esq11@yahoo.com)

Yours faithfully,

Barrister Ogbuji Mike

Ogbuji Mike Chambers
123 palm Avenue
Lagos Nigeria

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Here we go!


Author:
Marie
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:26:45 09/29/07 Sat

Welp, today is Tuesday July 3rd and tomorrow morning at 5am Shantell and I hit the road with a team of 10 others from the church we’re working with, in order to travel the final leg of our journey, Mission : Mozambique . Located on the Southeast coast of Africa and about 1,000 km from the island nation of Madagascar (please tell me you’ve seen the movie), it is the poorest nation in the world (according to Pastor Harry ). If it is no longer officially the poorest nation in the world it remains one of the poorest. They have the most extreme climates of either droughts or flooding and malaria is very bad there. Thankfully, though, it is winter now and the mosquitoes won’t be as bad, although we’ve been told that they’re pretty relentless any time of year. We are going to Chokwan, Mashishe, Inhambane (pronunciation: unknown), all very rural areas of the country, Mashishe being the most rural. We’ll be working and living among Portuguese speaking Muslims and traditional ethnic people, as well as those who follow no religion in particular but just live life. We’ll be doing pretty much the same stuff we did in Swaziland so check that e-mail if you want a recap. (so crazy that that was almost two months ago!)

The other day I read in Proverbs 24:32-- “I applied my heart to what I observed and learned a lesson from what I saw,” and given the amount of time we’ve been here and the true journey it’s been, I think that verse fits quite nicely….but there’s still more to be gleaned. Also, the border post can be very difficult, we’ve been told, b/c Mozambique ’s government is really corrupt. They can make us sit for hours if they want b/c we won’t bribe them to get through the border. We’re also bringing two trailers full of clothing and canned goods for the people and the border guards really like to hassle us for that (both just b/c they can, and also b/c many people come to the border claiming their goods are for humanitarian work, when in actuality they sell them when they make it across). Knowing all of th is, please pray accordingly for us.

Now, what have we been up to since I last wrote? I can hardly remember when that was… Actually, we’ve done a ton of low-key stuff b/c the strike has still been on. It actually just ended July 1st with the government and union officials in a deadlock! The union had to accept the final offer of a 7.5% wage increase…..no one is really happy. The whole reason they went on strike (and spent an entire month off of work w/ no pay!) was to get their annual 6% increase doubled to 12% but they only ended up with 7.5%. Basically, the government goes on getting boatloads of cash while the people get nothing. Percentages put me to sleep, though, so let’s talk about something else.

Shantell and I went to a huge game park again and we saw lions, elephants, zebras, giraffes, buffalo etc. etc. up close and personal— everything you see on the National Geographic baby! I have roughly 1 billion photos. We also went to Amangwe Village , this incredible safe haven for poor, ill and neglected people of all ages. The facilities were amazing and it’s actually a place I would consider working at full time. We also visited a bunch of orphanages. The kids there are just starved for love and attention.

In the midst of other ministry activities such as home visits and leading “junior youth” meetings too, our latest endeavor has been VBS, which finishes tomorrow. We planned this fun Treasure Island theme and miraculously it came together out of nothingness. Let me explain: a low key past three weeks all of a sudden picked up and we left for Monguzi—a very poor, rural area in south Africa close to the border of Mozambique—in order to work with a little church there. While we were gone the Pastor’s wife made us a huge homemade treasure chest and all this great islandy stuff. It really created an awesome atmosphere for the kids—one the two of us could never have done during this crunch time. God is so cool, how He just cares about the little stuff.

Monguzi was amazing too. We had three full days of activities planned. The church building was too remotely located for people to walk back and forth for three days so about 120 people camped out for two nights to be with us! They rolled out their straw mats, hung their little satchels and suitcases in nearby trees and cooked over an open fire with two HUGE black cauldrons. The first night’s church service they said, “We were very much beginning to feel neglected and forgotten. But clearly, if you came all the way from America we are not neglected.” (!!!) so amazing. We also camped out and cooked over an open fire under a dark, cloudless sky and full moon (it gets dark at 5pm here b/c its winter) —it was gorgeous!! It was literally a three day s lumber party w/ over 100 people. Also, I was given the chance to preach again, which was an awesome experience. Amazingly the next night’s sermon that followed mine lined up perfectly with what I preached on! That, of course, was a crazy new experience for me. I could go on forever about the kids too but let’s just say they’re neglected, numerous, poor and beautiful and oh so curious.

Please pray for these people as well for several reasons: they have almost no bibles in their language (Zulu) so they’re still so uneducated about all things pertaining to the Lord, it’s culturally expected that at 16 girls become breeding machines so there are tons of kids w/ no fathers and so many young mothers and promiscuous teens, very poor rural education keeps kids in secondary school until they’re in their 20’s (we met a 24 year old who was in 12th grade!), and they’re experiencing any and all effects of poverty—malnutrition and no medical attention included.

New experience after new experience keeps coming our way and it’s really been such an adventure. We’re no longer the new cats on the scene b/c a Malaysian pastor William Vun and his wife came to town for a few days. They’re great, and it’s been kinda strange and nice to not be the one observed through every bite of dinner!

Also, I’m not normally a super-spiritual person but many of you may have realized that July 7th, 2007 (7/7/07) is coming up this Saturday. Given the number sequence, Christian TV stations and churches have been talking about how, since the Bible is loaded with seven references, really significant happenings are supposed to occur on this day (such as fulfillment of some long lost deep desires/prayer, healings etc). I’m doing my best to believe that God’s gonna do some awesome stuff on that day when we’re in Mozambique so I hope you do too. Fast, pray, don’t hold back; whatever you’ve been hoping and believing God for may just be loosed in the heavens on that day!

Hope you all are enjoying long summer nights and barbecues. And I apologize that this e-mail isn’t nearly as entertaining as it could be. Just give me a pity laugh or two okay? I will attempt to write when I return from Mozambique and then I will see all of you either sooner or later back in the States (sans Brianna who is in Germany )! Do me a favor and work on your tan for me b/c I’m certainly not getting one here!

Ps. I ate sheep stomach lining at an Indian wedding about a month ago….yum?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Thanks KOAM


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:16:23 09/26/07 Wed

I just wanted to THANK "koam.com" for keeping this board linked to their site.

I tihink it may be the only connection this board has to the outside...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: QUEEFING


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:50:58 08/15/07 Wed

Howard a pussy fart is called a QUEEB not a queef. I was listening to the show the day the your guests were telling you about a pussy fart (years ago) and they were not sure what it was called. the girl from philly thought it was a queef .Its not. It makes me crazy when you call it a queef. Could you please call it by the right name from now on? p.s. pay artie anything it takes to keep him next jan. he just makes the show for me.(if he leaves it would be like losing fred,it just would not work ).thanks former queeb champion.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: a message to daei on my website who said free palestine


Author:
tirdad gharib
[Edit]

Date Posted: 01:41:22 11/03/06 Fri

good evening to our great Bill Oreilly and all the great Fox news americans. a message to daei who says free palestine and has placed all these pictures on the website. daei tirdad you placed your name. respect america respect israel,respect the world. from mogtada alsadr to nasrallah and ahmadinejad all islamic terrorists,alqada,who started all this? surelly not israel, the islamic fundemantist terrorist did, the average muslim palestinnian and all over the world the hard working taxi driver wants peace, but you and all other fundemantils islamic terrorists do not want peace. this is my point, after you pray for allah your allah , and then all the beheadings torture stonning hangings by the islamic fundemantils terrorists. these cruel monsters will never go to gods heavan, hell exists up where god is. i am so glad to be a proud american christian,and jesus, is my life, i never even think of disrespecting other religion, god bless america god bless our us troops they are heros.and god bless all my us veteran friends. fox is the number one news indeed.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: a message to daei on my website who said free palestine


Author:
T (Peace on Earth)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:01:43 04/05/07 Thu

I look at that web site and pictures. The web page massage is peace on earth. May be you should view Mr. Daei's september 11 page. Mr. Daei will show you the true picture and its up to the reader to decide. The web page name is Tirdad View.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: a message to daei on my website who said free palestine


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:05:48 05/21/07 Mon

.
Dear friends please take a good look at mr daeis website on free palestine he has placed all those pictures badlly burned of innocent children which is very sad, but he does not mention anything about the mollahs in iran torturing hangings and destroying the young women and children in iran children in iran are being executed by the facist mollahs , he not once mentionnes about our us troops our heros thousand got killed by the islamic terrroist no mention of that he does nor say about 9/11 and says how sorry he is for the victims of 9/11 he does not mention that hammas and hezbollah are firing at israel all the time mr daei, you are among those who every one knows your concept, shame on you. support our us troops.and support america the greatest nation on earth.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: some real ass shit


Author:
dallas texas nigga
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:38:21 08/11/07 Sat

fuck u and ur pussy ass 9-11 shit im tired of hearin about 9-11. that shit was 7 years ago get over it and fuck bush to. because of dat nigga these gas prices are a bitch i dont give a fuck about wat is going on in dat fucked up world i only give a fuck about my hood and dats real nigga

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: a message to daei on my website who said free palestine


Author:
Tirdad Daei (Thomas) (;))
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:36:00 05/25/07 Fri

Dear friends,
I would like to guide you to these two links in my web site. Free Palestine is only one page out of many articles and pages in my main web site. Please visit the link Free Iran Woman: http://tirdad.4t.com/FREEWoman.html also please visit September 11th or World Trade Center (WTC) page as other reader mentioned. http://www.tirdad14.jokestan.cc/Soccer/aircrash/wtc-usa.html . I am really glad to read your responses and I would like to thank you all for visiting my web site. I am glad that I have found this forum and it is good to have dialog between different views and opinions. Thatˇ¦s the whole idea behind my page. I have been living in United State since I was 19 and I am really appreciative for all the opportunities that this great country has provided me and my family. You can also visit my other pages such as Iranian food, Iranian names, Space, Judo, Wrestling, Politics, music, etc... God Bless you all ;)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re:SUPPORT OUR HEROS AND OUR US TROOPS IF YOU SAY YOU ARE APPRECIATIVE OF AMRICA


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:46:00 06/05/07 Tue

THIS GUY DAEI IS A JOKE HE DOES NOT EVEN SAYS ONE WORD ABOUT OUR US TROOPS IN IRAQ AND AFGHANISTAN DAEI IS A PHONY.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: a message to daei on my website who said free palestine


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:54:40 06/12/07 Tue

R U on drug budd? What has Palestine to do with our troops? If he is phony, what are u and Pinokiu Bush? Palestine is not what killing our troops in Iraq. Oh, wait a minute what are we doing there in first place? Who lied to us? Is Iraq was a imminent treat? President of United State needs to support our troops and not send our men and women to the harm way. Plus millions of dollars of our tax payers to this phony war and Israel. May be we need to help Darfur or hunger in the world. May be U need to think twice before u say shit. We are in this shit hole because of people like u and corrupt government. May be they don't have any thing better to do than hidding money in their freezer. Or exposing our CIA opratives and secrets and in dangering their lives. VOTE OBAMA!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Senator Dodd vs Dennis Miller


Author:
Sharon S. (flabbergasted!)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:33:13 08/02/07 Thu

I'm with Dennis Miller 100%, Bill. When "Dems" open their mouths they are so tragic. Time spent listening to them is time wasted!!! At least no one can say Bill O'Reilly isn't fair and Balanced. . .I think?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: what happened to red white and blue and mom's apple pie country?


Author:
Trish
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:36:43 07/14/07 Sat

Need to know WHY all these people that come to our country,for whatever reasons,then continue to have know loyality or love for MY country! Burning our flag,trying to make our country their's,in ways of how they lived in their countries???? WE do not demand things that aren't our ways of living BUT they do ,why is this ??Our FLAG is RED WHITE AND BLUE final!!! Respect it not burn it!!! I will continue to speak English,nothing else.This is my country and I love it. I'm sick and tired of people runnung our country their way, and if we dare speak out, we are the ones that get punished WHY is this??? They have all the rights ,we don't What??? Bill O'Reilly, is the most honest person on televison,AND the smartest! No spin should happen alot more with every American!!!And have people forgotten WE have had many wars,long and fatal ones, Always will! So please SUPORT OUR TROOPS NOT CONDEMD THEM. GOD BLESS AMERICAN FOREVER AND EVER LET FREEDOOM LIVE !!!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: what happened to red white and blue and mom's apple pie country?


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 09:24:22 07/15/07 Sun

Sir, I respectfully disagree with you.

Burning a flag isn't a sin against you, or this country.

Flags are burned for different reasons for different people. To some burning a flag is the ONLY way to disgard it in a respectful and traditional manner. May I suggest you attend a VFW flag burning ritual, and see what they think about their right to burn a flag.

Do you recall the flag that made the U.S. tour after 9-11, that was from the Trade Center Towers?

I spoke with many who thought that to parade THAT flag about was sin against the flag's tradition(s). To them, it served as evidence that we can be grought to our knees, and that upon retrieval from ground zero, it should have been ceremonial cremated, and replaced.

People burn flags because they are no longer representations of their host, creator, country, in an up or down matter.

If someone thought their country no longer stood for itself, its flag might be burned. If a flag was tattered and torn, and no longer represented it country's actual condition, it might be burned.

I hope you can understand that making laws against this practice, is no less than trying to police people's thoughts.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Foundations of Betrayal, by Phil Kent


Author:
Ken Fontenot, Opelousas, La. (Why Our Nation Is Declining)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:43:13 07/09/07 Mon

Was flipping thru tv channels and landed on cspan2 last night. Phil Kent was discussing his new book, Foundations of Betrayal. If he is credible, and his research is valid, then the majority of the major foundations as the Ford, Rockefellar, Turner, Soros, Gates, and others are funneling millions of dollars into organizations that are trying to destroy the United Sates and bring on a one world government. They are like termites, pushing open borders, open transportation from Central America to Canada, destroy Christianity at all costs, reinvent American History slanted to the left, and totally disrupt the legal and political systems. Some organizations are the ACLU, Greenpeace, Sierra Club, the National Council of Churches, and multiple Muslim terrorist fronts to name a few. Only the United States (mostly theMiddle Class) are stopping it.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Foundations of Betrayal, by Phil Kent


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:31:37 07/17/07 Tue

Did you notice the heading atop this board?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Happy fathers day to BIll oreilly and our heros our us trops and to a hero John Walsh


Author:
Tirdad Gharib (very happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 06:15:00 06/15/07 Fri

Hello to our great american hero bill oreilly happy fathers day to you on sunday my dear friend and to all of you happy fathers day especially tou our us troops in iraq and afghanistan and all the vets i wish you a very happy fathers day stay safe my friends god bless tirdad nashville tennesse.happy fathers day to one of my great hero JOHN WALSH the hero of the americas most wanted a great and a superbe man a true hero that has done so much for our great nation thanks alot dear John Walsh.you are a true hero,

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Immigration


Author:
Judy Ann (sad)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:25:11 06/14/07 Thu

Bill~~~~love your show!!As does my 90 year old mother who wouldn't miss it!!! In fact she introduced me to your show a few years back.

Re illegal immigration---years ago,this country was founded by allowing immigrants to reside here. They came here to work, they came for freedom and they went thru the correct channels to do so. They did NOT expect hand-outs----and even if they were Polish, Russian, Jewish, German--you name it. THEY WERE EXPECTED TO SPEAK ENGLISH!!!!!!!!!!!! These people who come over here to escape their own country now need to abide by our laws--they shouldn't have ANY rights until they go through the legal system correctly. They need to go back to their own country and speak THERE as loudly as they do here!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Paris Hilton


Author:
Ruth Le May
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:09:12 06/12/07 Tue

Bill, I beleive enough air time has been spent on Paris Hilton. She has been a spoiled brat now says she has changed. Lets hope so.

Ruth Le May
California City
CA 93505

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: ??


Author:
mark
[Edit]

Date Posted: 02:38:39 06/07/07 Thu

Is this a Howard Stern fanboard or some faggy Republican board? I'm lost on the internets.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Being Truckulent


Author:
Mr. Tommie Pennebaker
[Edit]

Date Posted: 22:25:15 01/23/06 Mon

Hello Bill,

When I heard you mention the word "truckulent" last night, I looked it up in my dictionary. The word means to be fierce or aggressive. I would say that you are being very truckulent, especially when relating to the Cashman War.

Tommie Pennebaker
Clute, Tx 77531

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Being Truckulent


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:05:13 08/04/08 Mon

>Hello Bill,
>
>When I heard you mention the word "truckulent" last
>night, I looked it up in my dictionary. The word means
>to be fierce or aggressive. I would say that you are
>being very truckulent, especially when relating to the
>Cashman War.
>
>Tommie Pennebaker
>Clute, Tx 77531

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Unusual American Family


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:43:15 06/02/07 Sat

Bill, I recently saw, on a Fox program, a story of a young black student finishing high school and never missing a day.
In the Dallas Morning News of Monday, May 21, there was a story of the Allen and Shelley George family who have the work ethic we wished all American families had. The son, Brett, just finished high school and in 14 years of school, he didn't miss a day. This included kindergarten and repeat of one grade. His older sister, Candice never missed a day of school, his father has 67 sick days he has not used, his mother has 97 sick days unused. His parents insist they eat dinner together each day and as far as the father is concerned school is the kids job.
Just thought it was worth a good word. Jean Lewis, Garland, Texas

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Unusual American Family


Author:
Jean Lewis
[Edit]

Date Posted: 13:46:06 06/02/07 Sat

>Bill, I recently saw, on a Fox program, a story of a
>young black student finishing high school and never
>missing a day.
>In the Dallas Morning News of Monday, May 21, there
>was a story of the Allen and Shelley George family who
>have the work ethic we wished all American families
>had. The son, Brett, just finished high school and in
>14 years of school, he didn't miss a day. This
>included kindergarten and repeat of one grade. His
>older sister, Candice never missed a day of school,
>his father has 67 sick days he has not used, his
>mother has 97 sick days unused. His parents insist
>they eat dinner together each day and as far as the
>father is concerned school is the kids job.
>Just thought it was worth a good word.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Anyone know a good site to meet some lovely Korean Dudes? Assholes.


Author:
@GOD@
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:23:34 05/26/07 Sat


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: happy memorial day to my dear friend Bill Oreilly


Author:
Tirdad Gharib (very happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:23:42 05/25/07 Fri

Dear Americans dear friends all over the world as a proud american consevative i would like to thank our great american patriot hero Bill Oreilly of fox. fox is number one,Bill see you back on tuesday, great friend. bless you for alll you have done and doing great weekend.today is also a great day because our great president George W. Bush has shown the democrats that we will never surrender.and another great day the anti american women name rosie odonell is gone.bye rosie.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Immigration


Author:
Hank Vogler North Spring Valley Nevada
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:17:20 05/17/07 Thu

I bring in people from Peru and Chile to help me with my sheep.They enter under the H2A program. It is legal. The bureaucrats really slow the process down. I believe that this amnesty program will hurt all of us that bring these workers in legally.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Congradulations to Bill Oreilly and fox for being number one


Author:
tirdad (very happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:11:13 05/12/07 Sat

Dear BiLL Oreilly
Good evenning to you my great american hero friend. happy mothers day to your wife and to your mother,and congradulations to you for being number one 1 of the highest ranking tv shows in the us, Fox is always telling the truth, and thanks for all you have done and doing.concernning our great country the usa my favourite politician is Speaker Newt Gingrich. there are alot more republicans that i admire and i will let you know more .Bill oreilly is number one. Tirdad tennessee nashville.we need a president like Ronald Reagan for 2008.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Immigration


Author:
Catriana Lewis (sick and tired)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 11:15:45 04/25/07 Wed

I feel here in San Antonio,Tx. The immigration law is not working. Just Texas by it's self have the most hospansic's here who are not legal and livig up under false names. There are so many jobs here that many American's can be working to support their family, so welfare can only be used for an emergency need for American family's only. To all congressman in the White House we want all our jobs back to take care our family's, we as American's would like for Welfare to not assit any longer. We as American's
would like to work, pay taxes and rebuild an strong and healthy encomoy. But, we will never have that srong and heathy enocomy if we as American's keep leting hospanic's take our jobs, living here up under a false name, not paying taxes and hurting our enocomy. Another problem is, that our schools is so overcrowded here in Texas, I really feel it's hurting all American children's education. Congresman, you have to admit that it is very hard for a teacher to teach 60 students in a classroom and out of those 60 students there are only 5 legal students and 8 American's. Which cause, lot's of concern by parents and also makes me wonder why the United States have the highest drop out. I'm sick and tired of illegals breaking in my home call Texas, taking needs away from many Amiercan family. I totally agree with what President Bush is doing with the out controll immigrants and overcrowdedness and I'm a democrat. To the democrat, in the White House who's fighting to be the next president, YOU NEED TO OPEN THOSES EYES AND REALIZE IMMIGRATION IS HURTING AMERICANS IN SO,SO MANY WAYS.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Interesting e-mail sent to O'Reily@foxnews.com


Author:
"King of the Americas"
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:45:49 03/27/01 Tue

ONCE UPON A TIME...

...in a land far far away, a man's death ment something!

It used to be when a man died for what he believed in, it was also believed that he was probably right, because he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice for what he believed in. Today, we live in a world where a person's actions are paid no more attention to than the global temperature. Our actions are as meaningless as our messages are voiceless. Lone bombers are labeled as crackpots gone nuts, and their actions deemed those of terrorists. *If one man had infected himself with the plague, and then burst into the King's Court to try to kill as many people as possible, he would have been considered the lone voice of a mistreated people willing to sacrifice their very lives for freedom from a tyranical overlord. So it is that I ask, "How did we ever arrive at where we are today?" Our justice system releases murders daily, while we lock up non-violent drug offenders in a place where drugs are easy to get. However if you have money, the situation changes. Because the honest truth about America is that if you have enough money, you can buy anything you wish, be it a night in the Lincoln Bedroom, the Presidency, A pardon, or just to kill your ex-wife with you own hands and get away with it! In America, it is ALL for SALE!!!

Question: "How many innocent men can one person or group of people kill in America, and go on unpunished? Ten men? A hundred? Could a really wealthy man kill 100,000 innocent people and get away with it?" Before you answer, consider a few of these cases: Browne vs. Simpson, the People vs the Tobacco Industry, or the People vs. Teddy Kennedy.

What I am trying to demonstrate is that something is broke and needs fixing. Justice has taken a back seat to Capitalistic Power. The kind of power used to buy air time, the better lawyer, the bigger car, the 1st class ticket, or the better player.

*Timothy McVeigh is going to be put to death soon. He sought to bomb and kill innocent people in an attempt to deliver a message. Personally, I'd like to know why he or any one else would do such a thing. When a man dies, we should take notice, not only of his death but his life leading up to it.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Interesting e-mail sent to O'Reily@foxnews.com


Author:
bob anderson
[Edit]

Date Posted: 23:58:01 05/17/02 Fri

>how ONCE UPON A TIME...
>
>...in a land far far away, a man's death ment
>something!
>
>It used to be when a man died for what he believed in,
>it was also believed that he was probably right,
>because he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice
>for what he believed in. Today, we live in a world
>where a person's actions are paid no more attention to
>than the global temperature. Our actions are as
>meaningless as our messages are voiceless. Lone
>bombers are labeled as crackpots gone nuts, and their
>actions deemed those of terrorists. *If one man had
>infected himself with the plague, and then burst into
>the King's Court to try to kill as many people as
>possible, he would have been considered the lone voice
>of a mistreated people willing to sacrifice their very
>lives for freedom from a tyranical overlord. So it is
>that I ask, "How did we ever arrive at where we are
>today?" Our justice system releases murders daily,
>while we lock up non-violent drug offenders in a place
>where drugs are easy to get. However if you have
>money, the situation changes. Because the honest truth
>about America is that if you have enough money, you
>can buy anything you wish, be it a night in the
>Lincoln Bedroom, the Presidency, A pardon, or just to
>kill your ex-wife with you own hands and get away with
>it! In America, it is ALL for SALE!!!
>
>Question: "How many innocent men can one person or
>group of people kill in America, and go on unpunished?
>Ten men? A hundred? Could a really wealthy man kill
>100,000 innocent people and get away with it?" Before
>you answer, consider a few of these cases: Browne vs.
>Simpson, the People vs the Tobacco Industry, or the
>People vs. Teddy Kennedy.
>
>What I am trying to demonstrate is that something is
>broke and needs fixing. Justice has taken a back seat
>to Capitalistic Power. The kind of power used to buy
>air time, the better lawyer, the bigger car, the 1st
>class ticket, or the better player.
>
>*Timothy McVeigh is going to be put to death soon. He
>sought to bomb and kill innocent people in an attempt
>to deliver a message. Personally, I'd like to know
>why he or any one else would do such a thing. When a
>man dies, we should take notice, not only of his death
>but his life leading up to it.

how come all the catholic pedifiles are americans I can't believe that other countries don't have this problem. Does the church have that much control over the people in other countries.
Bob

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Interesting e-mail sent to O'Reily@foxnews.com


Author:
donna wargo
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:47:51 06/24/02 Mon

what is your radio station?in connecticut.
>
>...in a land far far away, a man's death ment
>something!
>
>It used to be when a man died for what he believed in,
>it was also believed that he was probably right,
>because he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice
>for what he believed in. Today, we live in a world
>where a person's actions are paid no more attention to
>than the global temperature. Our actions are as
>meaningless as our messages are voiceless. Lone
>bombers are labeled as crackpots gone nuts, and their
>actions deemed those of terrorists. *If one man had
>infected himself with the plague, and then burst into
>the King's Court to try to kill as many people as
>possible, he would have been considered the lone voice
>of a mistreated people willing to sacrifice their very
>lives for freedom from a tyranical overlord. So it is
>that I ask, "How did we ever arrive at where we are
>today?" Our justice system releases murders daily,
>while we lock up non-violent drug offenders in a place
>where drugs are easy to get. However if you have
>money, the situation changes. Because the honest truth
>about America is that if you have enough money, you
>can buy anything you wish, be it a night in the
>Lincoln Bedroom, the Presidency, A pardon, or just to
>kill your ex-wife with you own hands and get away with
>it! In America, it is ALL for SALE!!!
>
>Question: "How many innocent men can one person or
>group of people kill in America, and go on unpunished?
>Ten men? A hundred? Could a really wealthy man kill
>100,000 innocent people and get away with it?" Before
>you answer, consider a few of these cases: Browne vs.
>Simpson, the People vs the Tobacco Industry, or the
>People vs. Teddy Kennedy.
>
>What I am trying to demonstrate is that something is
>broke and needs fixing. Justice has taken a back seat
>to Capitalistic Power. The kind of power used to buy
>air time, the better lawyer, the bigger car, the 1st
>class ticket, or the better player.
>
>*Timothy McVeigh is going to be put to death soon. He
>sought to bomb and kill innocent people in an attempt
>to deliver a message. Personally, I'd like to know
>why he or any one else would do such a thing. When a
>man dies, we should take notice, not only of his death
>but his life leading up to it.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: WORDS CANNOT EXPRESS.........................


Author:
Gene Gervasi
[Edit]

Date Posted: 20:55:27 09/17/02 Tue

Dear Bill, I commend you for being the VOICE of The ALREADY FORGOTTEN CHILDREN ! VICTUMS of a society gone insane What Happened To JUSTICE for the Victums.I was NOT taught Hatered but I feel so much anger at these Vile creatures who call themselves lawyers .BILL KEEP IT UP ! THERE VOICES CANNOT BE FORGOTTEN............ Gene ,Wylie Tx.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Common sense rules!


Author:
edward setner
[Edit]

Date Posted: 14:38:01 03/16/03 Sun

Dear Bill,Think of all the money we could save on dues by telling the united nations to get screwed. Of course hans blix would have to find another place to eat his grilled fish.(I think that its the only reason he wants his stay prolonged).Of course he could apply for Iraq citizenship.As far as some of our allies treat them like wood ticks, and pick them off, before they suck us dry.We don't need them watching our backs.They didn't have a 9/11. We did.When we have a huge problem with someone, don't be stupid and wait for them to make the first move, KICK them in the balls and get it over with before we find oursleves on the ground for the count.(who would sympathize with us?) Ed
>something!
>
>It used to be when a man died for what he believed in,
>it was also believed that he was probably right,
>because he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice
>for what he believed in. Today, we live in a world
>where a person's actions are paid no more attention to
>than the global temperature. Our actions are as
>meaningless as our messages are voiceless. Lone
>bombers are labeled as crackpots gone nuts, and their
>actions deemed those of terrorists. *If one man had
>infected himself with the plague, and then burst into
>the King's Court to try to kill as many people as
>possible, he would have been considered the lone voice
>of a mistreated people willing to sacrifice their very
>lives for freedom from a tyranical overlord. So it is
>that I ask, "How did we ever arrive at where we are
>today?" Our justice system releases murders daily,
>while we lock up non-violent drug offenders in a place
>where drugs are easy to get. However if you have
>money, the situation changes. Because the honest truth
>about America is that if you have enough money, you
>can buy anything you wish, be it a night in the
>Lincoln Bedroom, the Presidency, A pardon, or just to
>kill your ex-wife with you own hands and get away with
>it! In America, it is ALL for SALE!!!
>
>Question: "How many innocent men can one person or
>group of people kill in America, and go on unpunished?
>Ten men? A hundred? Could a really wealthy man kill
>100,000 innocent people and get away with it?" Before
>you answer, consider a few of these cases: Browne vs.
>Simpson, the People vs the Tobacco Industry, or the
>People vs. Teddy Kennedy.
>
>What I am trying to demonstrate is that something is
>broke and needs fixing. Justice has taken a back seat
>to Capitalistic Power. The kind of power used to buy
>air time, the better lawyer, the bigger car, the 1st
>class ticket, or the better player.
>
>*Timothy McVeigh is going to be put to death soon. He
>sought to bomb and kill innocent people in an attempt
>to deliver a message. Personally, I'd like to know
>why he or any one else would do such a thing. When a
>man dies, we should take notice, not only of his death
>but his life leading up to it.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Interesting e-mail sent to O'Reily@foxnews.com


Author:
No name
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:18:27 04/25/07 Wed

>ONCE UPON A TIME...
>
>...in a land far far away, a man's death ment
>something!
>
>It used to be when a man died for what he believed in,
>it was also believed that he was probably right,
>because he was willing to make the ultimate sacrifice
>for what he believed in. Today, we live in a world
>where a person's actions are paid no more attention to
>than the global temperature. Our actions are as
>meaningless as our messages are voiceless. Lone
>bombers are labeled as crackpots gone nuts, and their
>actions deemed those of terrorists. *If one man had
>infected himself with the plague, and then burst into
>the King's Court to try to kill as many people as
>possible, he would have been considered the lone voice
>of a mistreated people willing to sacrifice their very
>lives for freedom from a tyranical overlord. So it is
>that I ask, "How did we ever arrive at where we are
>today?" Our justice system releases murders daily,
>while we lock up non-violent drug offenders in a place
>where drugs are easy to get. However if you have
>money, the situation changes. Because the honest truth
>about America is that if you have enough money, you
>can buy anything you wish, be it a night in the
>Lincoln Bedroom, the Presidency, A pardon, or just to
>kill your ex-wife with you own hands and get away with
>it! In America, it is ALL for SALE!!!
>
>Question: "How many innocent men can one person or
>group of people kill in America, and go on unpunished?
>Ten men? A hundred? Could a really wealthy man kill
>100,000 innocent people and get away with it?" Before
>you answer, consider a few of these cases: Browne vs.
>Simpson, the People vs the Tobacco Industry, or the
>People vs. Teddy Kennedy.
>
>What I am trying to demonstrate is that something is
>broke and needs fixing. Justice has taken a back seat
>to Capitalistic Power. The kind of power used to buy
>air time, the better lawyer, the bigger car, the 1st
>class ticket, or the better player.
>
>*Timothy McVeigh is going to be put to death soon. He
>sought to bomb and kill innocent people in an attempt
>to deliver a message. Personally, I'd like to know
>why he or any one else would do such a thing. When a
>man dies, we should take notice, not only of his death
>but his life leading up to it.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: You don't get it, Mr. O'Reilly


Author:
Sigurd Bauer
[Edit]

Date Posted: 17:00:40 04/17/07 Tue

Mr. O'Reilly, the reason why so many law makers and judges object to support Jessica's Law, is, that they themselves are probably "Closet Pediphiles!" And once caught they don't want to be affected by the severity under this law.

Sigurd Bauer
Vacaville, CA

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Imus


Author:
Tony Mordente (pissed)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:47:21 04/12/07 Thu

I am not a fan of Don Imus, don't listen to him. His remark about the B-ball team was hideous and deserves to be punished for that remark. But to lose his job???? I have heard he has said many sensitive remarks about all races and religions, why now? And the the B-ball young ladies she be offended and angry. but the one who said "I am somebody's child" .......isn't she still "somebody's child when she is listening to Rap?
Tony Mordente

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Imus


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:11:26 04/15/07 Sun

Have any of you ever seen "Rush Hour" with Jackie Chan & Chris Tucker?

I think there is a scene that depicts what happens to non-blacks, when they try to use black lingo in the presense of a black man, very well. Moreover, I think this is what happened to Imus...

In the movie, Jackie's character finds himself in a 'black' bar, where he approaches the barkeep and asks, "Wazzup my nigga?"

The next thing he knows, he is fighting the entire bar.

Admittedly, I don't listen to a lot of rap or hip hop, but I DO know that within the black culture, you ARE allowed to refer to friends and family as "your niggas", and calling someone 'nappy-headed' or even a 'ho' can also be done in sport or as a term of endearment, but NOT if you are white...

Even if you are a 'wigger', in certain instances using any of the above terms toward a black man could get your arse handed to you.

Imus didn't say anything 'new', in fact, these are terms straight from the black community. I don't think he was 'serious' when he made those statements. I mean I seriously doubt that he knew anything about those women. They were a 'rough' looking bunch when you compared them to the Tennesse team. I heard the broadcast, when it was originally made, as I occasionally watch Imus on MSNBC. I thought, when I first heard it that he was saying that the Rutger's team was 'hard', or more 'street' than the softer looking Tennessee team.

It a way it was as if he was complimenting them, but only if he were Snoop Dog.

Coming from an old white guy, to some, it sounded like the total opposite.

Let this be a lesson to everyone, "double standards abound."

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: #1


Author:
jimmy t (bababooooey)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 04:17:43 04/10/07 Tue

Howard is so right about O&A!! They would kill Opie and Anthony's Rating. 0.0 WTF?? These guys are no talent hacks!! I would love it if CBS took their money back from these O&A faggots and gave Bubba an opportunity to shine. I would love it if CBS would give Bubba and the guys a 6am to 9am or 10am and then they could do two or three more hours on Sirius. I would love it if you guys could work out something like that.

I have an idea take Opie and Anthony out of the markets where they are FLAT and where they have totally FAILED and give Bubba a shot!! How can you have a 0.0 rating in Chicago??? Mancow's replacement Alan Cox is awful! Alan Cox was here in Pitsburgh and he is soooo unfunny it's pathetic! Alan Cox is Awful!! I do think Bubba would have much better ratings than those no Hack talentless faggots.

How can Opie and Anthony fuck with Howard?? Howard has been there and done that! These talentless Losers would never be #1 in both LA and New York! Howard sounds soooooo much better since he left regular BORING radio! Just like ME Howards listeners will eventually follow. I personally could not take those hacks any longer and went out and bought myself a Sirius Boombox and carkit!! O&A are both hacks with absolutely 0.00 talent just like their ratings!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Hello!


Author:
Caroline
[Edit]

Date Posted: 12:02:27 04/06/07 Fri

You make my nippples tingle Albert. Are you ever coming to Sweden?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Hello!


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 10:43:19 04/08/07 Sun

Send me a bottle of Absinthe, and we'll talk...

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Mitt Romney


Author:
G. Dirgo
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:14:12 03/23/07 Fri

Bill:

Why do you insist on calling Mitt Romney a Mormon?
Don't you know that Mormon is a derogatory term for a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day
Saints? Why must you mention his religion at all?
Or at least why don't you call Obama a Negro? Nor do
you mention the religion of other candidates. After
all (LDS) the common term for a member of the "Mormon"
church is a member of the 4th largest church in America.

George

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Mitt Romney


Author:
King of the Americas
[Edit]

Date Posted: 07:57:39 03/29/07 Thu

Mitt Romney has called HIMSELF a "Mormon" in public.

I have not heard Obama refer to himself as a "negro".

If you are offended by people calling Governor Romney a religious zealot, then maybe he should stop talking like one.

Do you know why people call them Mormon? Because "member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints" is WAY TOO LONG to write or say!

Are YOU a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints?

If so, I have questions, lots of them.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: america will win the war on islamic terrorism


Author:
tirdad gharib
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:52:15 06/17/06 Sat

Dear americans. dear fellow friends, we have eliminated alot of islamic jihadist terrorist, including that moster abu mussa alzarqawi, who is dead, and is in hell. now there is still alot to be done, patriotic americans: please do not listen to the far leftists, i was in charge of the battlefield in alot of places. so i know our us soldiers are having to deal with alot of presure, if we are sitting here right now it is because of our us soldiers, our hereos, god bless them, the world should be thankfull to the united states of america and the us troops, thank you, for all your emails, and soon the ayatollahs in islamic of iran, and ahmadinejad will be brought to justice, they not only sponsor teroism, but they are terorist, very sincerlly yours tirdad gharib from beverly hills california.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: Americans please support our us troops our heros.


Author:
Tirdad gharib
[Edit]

Date Posted: 08:16:28 10/28/06 Sat

Good evenning to all americans, it is almost election time, please support our us troops,in iraq and afghanistan,they are our heros, they are true patriots,as a proud american,i support all of our us troops. and may god bless them. very sincerlly yours.
tirdad gharib.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: saddam hussein,hanged, and in hell.


Author:
TIRDAD GHARIB
[Edit]

Date Posted: 15:50:55 12/31/06 Sun

Good evenning to all of you, finally saddam hussein is hanged and, he is indeed resting in hell, god bless our president of the united states George W. Bush. now iraq is free, god bless our us troops, in iraq and afghanistan,Happy new year to all of our us troops all over the world, tirdad gharib.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Re: BILL OREILLY FROM FOX A TRUE HERO


Author:
TIRDAD GHARIB (HAPPY)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 18:48:53 03/16/07 Fri

>Dear fellow americans and dear fellows from all over the world, we should all be thanking BILL OREILLY.from fox news,he is the best of the best journalist,a true patriot american who cares tremendouslly for our great nation the usa,look at jessicas law,bill oreilly did everything, to protect our children and is, a true hero he is indeed,and the world is watching bill oreilly,look at all his charity work culture warrior.giving it all free to our us troops,and so many other charitys, bill oreilly is indeed number one, thanks so much to you bill very sincerlly yours tirdad gharib march 16th 2007 in tennessee.his trip to iraq, meant the world to our heros our us troops,in iraq ,and this man is a great true hero american patriot,

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Bill Mahr


Author:
Anthony Mordente (happy)
[Edit]

Date Posted: 21:15:53 03/06/07 Tue

I wish I were a wordsmith so I could better describe your interview with Mr. Mahr.......my best is "PERFECT" He thinks he was doing comedy?
Tony Mordente
Henderson NV.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 2.94, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2008 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.