VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]234 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:42:34 09/19/11 Mon
Author: Andrew "Vinnie" Barriskell
Subject: Re: Classes
In reply to: Peter & Carol 's message, "Re: Classes" on 18:49:59 09/11/11 Sun

Funnily enough I had the same thought when I reviewed the regs and the entry list the other day. If the regs divide cars up by cubic capacity then there is a "power dimension" to the classes. Ergo, it seems to me that a car with a turbo or supercharger would attract some sort of "multiplier" as is common in other forms of competition.

It's a tough one :-) One can argue that the moment you introduce that you could bring in weight minimums. An 1800 MGB is quite different to an 1800 Caterham. I do think forced induction is a biggie though....

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.