VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 18:13:41 02/15/06 Wed
Author: cranston36
Subject: Viagra

Michigan, like many other states, is wrestling with the problem of birth control.
Like it or not, less children are being born into American families and the increase in population throughout the United States is not caused by domestic harmony and prosperity but by immigration.
The population of the United States is growing because of the influx of people moving to live here.
The problem that has surfaced in Michigan, and other states, is about insurance.
Should insurance companies pay for birth control by including it in their care offerings?
Many people say they should not have to pay.
Some say that the insurance companies should not be forced to pay for birth control.
A friend of mine said to me today, however, something that made me pause to think.
She said many insurance companies offer benefits to pay for Viagra.
What does this do?
It puts an artificial sex drive into men who are then driven to rape and abuse.
In that case, why not provide health benefits that pay for birth control.
Everyone knows that drugs are priced artificially high and insurance companies, at least health insurance companies, act no better than legalized loan sharks.
Why penalize women and give men an advantage that will lead to more abuse and unwanted pregnancies?
That is why I believe that if insurance companies pay for dried up old men to have erections then they should provide benefits to young women who do not want to be impregnated by these monsters.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.