VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:14:37 11/15/05 Tue
Author: Kyle
Subject: Re: New Orleans
In reply to: Pete 's message, "Re: New Orleans" on 17:32:15 11/14/05 Mon

>>>>>>>>Why not? Sure inter-ethnic mixing has been going
>>>on
>>>>>>>>for millennia, but even today, the trend for
>most
>>>>>>>>ethnic groups is STILL to stick to and marry one
>>>of
>>>>>>>>their own. It's certainly feasible because
>>>>>>>>preservation of ethnic bloodlines is still being
>>>>>done
>>>>>>>>unconsciously.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I think before we can focus in sub-racial
>>>>>preservation
>>>>>>>in the old world we should focus on racial
>>>>>>>preservation. I'm not opposed to someone wanting
>>to
>>>>>>>stick to their own ethnicity, however, I am
>>opposed
>>>>>to
>>>>>>>the idea of breaking up White-on-White unions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm just of the opinion that ethncities should be
>>>>>>encouraged to stick to their own, or very similar
>>>>>>ethnicities should be encouraged to marry. I 've
>>>>>>already given examples why.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I disagree. If you read accounts from Julius
>>>Caesar
>>>>>>or
>>>>>>>>even Tacitus, they report Celts as being very
>>>>>>>>homogeneous, with their tall, ruddy, and
>muscular
>>>>>>>>statures. This also held true for the ancient
>>>>>>>>inhabitants of Germania, and we both know those
>>>>>>traits
>>>>>>>>are typical of your common Nord as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>There are small amounts of Atlanto-Med admixture,
>>>>>>>however it is, as I said, small. Most of the
>>>>>>>Atlanto-Meds are confined to the southern part of
>>>>the
>>>>>>>British Isles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Not all, but a significant majority are.
>>>>>>>>Your typical med is much shorter, has a smaller
>>>>>>>>skeletal structure, darker, and has that
>"greasy"
>>>>>>>>look.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A lot of that has to do with the typical med
>diet.
>>>>In
>>>>>>>the US, the average height of meds is taller than
>>>in
>>>>>>>the old world. But regardless, there are going to
>>>be
>>>>>>>some height differences between different
>>subraces.
>>>>>>>Compare the Bantu to your average Negro for
>>>example.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>No, your typical Med is shorter than your average
>>NW
>>>>>>Eropean because of genetics. Diet plays a small
>>part
>>>>>>in height or bulk increase, but a lot of it is
>>still
>>>>>>determined by biology.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>An example of a true Med that could be related
>>>>>>>>to Nords would be the blonde haired, blue eyed
>>>>>>>>Northern Italians or Northern Spaniards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Actually, those are mixtures of Meds and Nords.
>>>>>>>However, those areas still have a strong Med
>>>>>presence,
>>>>>>>but not as strong as in the southern regions of
>>>>those
>>>>>>>countries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>True. Northern Italy was invaded by the Lombards,
>>as
>>>>>>well as the Vandals, and Visigoths.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>In fact, you
>>>>>>>>should do some reserach on the region of
>>Caledonia
>>>>>in
>>>>>>>>Spain. You would think you're in Ireland if you
>>>>went
>>>>>>>>there and saw the people - tall, pale skinned,
>>>>>>>>blue/green eyes, blonde/brown/red hair. The
>>>works.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Will do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>So my point is, it really isn't all that
>>>>un-feasible
>>>>>>>>to encourage ethnic preservation, it's still
>>being
>>>>>>>>done. Yes I know it would be boring to just
>stick
>>>>to
>>>>>>>>one particular ethnicity after a while and
>that's
>>>>>why
>>>>>>>>I would approve of Celtic types mixing with
>>>>Germanic
>>>>>>>>types with Baltic/Slavonic types. Not only does
>>>>>>>>(phenotype play a role, but culture as well. NW
>>>>>>>>European peoples have a different culture than
>>>Meds
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That wasn't really that true a hundred years ago
>>or
>>>>>>>so. The modern nordic culture really isn't White
>>>>>>>culture at all. Modern NW European culture is
>that
>>>>>>>"tolerance" bullshit. The best solution would be
>>to
>>>>>>>return to a culture similar to the one before the
>>>>Jew
>>>>>>>invasion and go from there, after kicking out the
>>>NW
>>>>>>>Somolians and Pakis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>All that "tolerance" bullshit doesn't erase the
>>>truth
>>>>>>that NW Europeans still have a culture of their
>>own,
>>>>>>and that it's significantly different from Med
>>>>>culture.
>>>>>>Even millenia ago, there were differences between
>>>>>>German and Celtic culture as opposed to Roman or
>>>>Greek
>>>>>>culture.
>>>>>>The Nordic Vikings differed from all four even
>when
>>>>it
>>>>>>came to culture.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>(frankly I think a lot of Meds today just have
>>big
>>>>>>>>mouths)and their ways of thinking are different.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>The same could be said of any ethnicity, really.
>>>>>Every
>>>>>>>type of ethnicity has its loudmouth boasters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Not so much as Mediterraneans. Having lived around
>>>>>>Italians in NY, I've got to say that they're just
>>so
>>>>>>obsessed with themsleves that they look as though
>>>>they
>>>>>>want to jerk off over it. If only the majority of
>>>Med
>>>>>>would actually have a look around and exercise
>>>common
>>>>>>sense, they'd know they aren't the only ones with
>>>>>>"culture".
>>>>>
>>>>>Yeah Italians do like to do that. I know.

Yep. Most definately true.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>It's best if people who share similar
>phenotypic,
>>>>>>>>cultural, and attitude traits come together.
>>>>>>>>Bloodlines are better preserved.
>>>>>>>>However, This isn't to say that different
>>European
>>>>>>>>ethnics shouldn't mix at all. But I wouldn't
>>>>>>encourage
>>>>>>>>too much of it. The we wouldn't know who's who.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Believe it or not, there are quite a few that
>>share
>>>>>>>that view, however, although I agree partially
>>with
>>>>>>>it, like I said, it shouldn't be to the extent
>>that
>>>>>it
>>>>>>>breaks apart White-on-White relationships, and I
>>>>>think
>>>>>>>it can only be applied to the Old World.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I spend some time on Amren. Their views are
>>pretty
>>>>>>>>similar to mine when it comes to sub-racial
>>>>>>>>preservation.
>>>>>>>>Let's face it, if we mixed ALL Whites together,
>>it
>>>>>>>>would be really fucking boring. Think of it like
>>>>>>this:
>>>>>>>>"Hey what are you?" The reply: "Well let's see,
>>>I'm
>>>>>>>>Irish, German, Italian, Ukrainian, Russian,
>>>>>>>>Hungarian, Greek, Swedish, etc." That's NOT what
>>I
>>>>>>>>want to see, and I know plenty of people who
>>share
>>>>>my
>>>>>>>>views.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Believe me, I'm NOT looking to establish some
>>White
>>>>>>>superstate of mixing all Whites into one single
>>>>>>>ethnicity. However, in the US, the example you
>>>>>>>provided is pretty much true for a lot of
>American
>>>>>>>Whites. I just recognize that the situation in
>the
>>>>>new
>>>>>>>world and Australia is different from Europe,
>>North
>>>>>>>Africa, and the Middle East.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't hate anyone who comes from multiple
>>>>>>>>backgrounds, I just want to see bloodlines
>>>>preserved
>>>>>>>>and continue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That can be arranged in the old world once the
>>>>jewish
>>>>>>>and NW problems are all solved and the liberal
>>>>>>>establishments are crushed for all time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's more than just racial bloodlines that should
>be
>>>>>>preserved. Different ethnic bloodlines should be
>>>>given
>>>>>>the same consideration. Everyone's unique and
>>>>>>different for a reason.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>About what you said about the Celts, if only all
>>>>the
>>>>>>>>Celts scattered across mainland Europe would
>come
>>>>>>>>together and unite with Ireland, Scotland, and
>>>>>Wales,
>>>>>>>>they could have a sort of a re-birth of the
>power
>>>>>>they
>>>>>>>>enjoyed millennia ago. Just having them being
>>>>>>>>scattered all over doesn't sit well with me. I'd
>>>>>like
>>>>>>>>to see them together again, putting factional
>>>>>>>>differences aside, procreating, and thriving.
>>>After
>>>>>>>>all, the Celts did rule Europe for centuries
>>>before
>>>>>>>>the Romans came on the scene. Sadly, Celtic
>>>>>>infighting
>>>>>>>>did them in more than the Roman invasions did.
>>But
>>>>>>>>that's another story for another time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'd say what really needs to happen is that the
>>>>Celts
>>>>>>>in Ireland need to kick out all of the Negroes
>and
>>>>>>>Pakis, and start having more kids per family, and
>>>>>then
>>>>>>>whatever problems there were would then be
>solved.
>>>I
>>>>>>>like the idea personally of a widespread Celtic
>>>>>>>presence. Despite my Italian surname, I have as
>>>much
>>>>>>>or more Irish than Italian blood in me, so I
>>>>>>>definately sympathize with matters concerning the
>>>>>>>Irish as well as Italian. I'm what you might call
>>a
>>>>>>>Heinz 57 (I have 10 or more ethnicities).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I would like to see the fighting over Northern
>>>>Ireland
>>>>>>end.
>>>>>>My take is this, they're fighting over religion:
>>>>>>Catholicism vs. Protestantnism. Big Deal! If there
>>>>was
>>>>>>some way I could convince them to forget about
>>>>>>religion and embrace their similarities, they're
>>>>>>Celts, they're fierce, they once ruled all of
>>>Europe,
>>>>>>the Anglos and turd world invaders are their real
>>>>>>enemies, and they need to break the vicious cycle
>>of
>>>>>>Celtic against Celtic infighting that has cursed
>>>>Celts
>>>>>>throughout history.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think the Angles and the Celts need to be
>>>>>enemies.
>>>>
>>>>They don't need to be but they are. Have you ever
>>read
>>>>the atrocities the Anglos committed against Ireland?
>>>>The attempts of genocide, rape, and brutalization
>>>>committed by British overseers? They were all
>>>>assholes, plain and simple.
>>>>And about the Irish Potato Famine, it wasn't just
>the
>>>>potatoes dying off that killed and drove off so many
>>>>Irish Celts, it was the Angles deliberately keeping
>>>>food supplies from entering Irish ports that caused
>>>>the greatest damage.
>>>>While Irish people (even small children) were dying,
>>>>livestock, pork, dairy, and wheat were barred from
>>>>entry into the Emerald Isle and shipped off
>elsewhere
>>>>as surplus so that the English could have made some
>>>>extra profits.
>>>>I'm not even going to go into the oppression the
>>>>American Anglos heaped on the Irish, who were the
>>>>first European immigrants to come here in great
>waves
>>>>and were shit on the worst out of all.
>>>>You can't just say that Celts have to forget about
>>>>everything and lose sight of a long time enemy.
>>>
>>>Yeah I knew all of this. Like Jonathan Swifts satire
>>>wa during that period I think. But they have made
>>>headway. IRA and Brits have done well with peace in
>>>comparison with other groups.
>>
>>The headway isn't getting anywhere. The only way real
>>progress can be made is if Ireland becomes united and
>>kick the British out of their northern region.
>>You see Israel and the neighboring Arab countries
>>continually make "headway" but violence breaks out the
>>following day.
>>
>>To jump to another topic, I'm going to start using my
>>real name, Kyle, on this forum from now on.
>
>How you doing Kyle?

The usual.
>
>And traffic sure seems to be slow here some time.

Yeah its been slow for a while.
>
>And I just have to say that this thread doesn't seem
>to be making much headway. Is interesting though.

I don't think the purpose is to make any headway. Everybody has different views and nobody is going to change them, it isn't the point. The point rather, is to present different perspectives and possibly even info that no one generally knows (i.e. fuck all the PC bullshit, Whites didn't capture Black slaves en masse, their own people sold other African POWs to European slave traders).
>
>I will admit that mixed kids tend to be pretty ugly.
>Not in every instance. I know.

Usually they tend to be. It's a totally different set of genes that really aren't compatible mixing together. It's when you get ehtnicities that have similar, but somewhat different pheotypes coming together that produce hot lookers IMHO.
For example, take a good look at people who are usually a mixture of Celtic/Germanic or Nordic background, especially the girls, they are STUNNING. The actress Ingred Bergman (famous for her role of Ilsa in "Casablanca" was German/Swedish) was gorgeous.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.