Re: 啦啦隊一事 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

May 16 2026, 10:50:39, Sat

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Re: 啦啦隊一事

Author:
蔡俊浩

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 23:10:57 11/14/05 Mon
In reply to: 此人已死 's message, "Re: 啦啦隊一事" on 21:27:24 11/14/05 Mon

我不是不信他沒有申出援手, 同學, 我信你,
我只是不信他亳無意欲去申出援手

我比較相信的板本是他的理性道道責任戰性了他感性的欲望
可能我入世未深,我信除左係一班大賊堆中, 很難搵到一個如此麻木不仁的人

中國人的道德觀念, 多依照直觀
較主張同情心, 熱心工作, 愛民這些由情緒帶動的道德判斷
所以德育工作, 是令人在合適時間, 有合適的情緒, 故注重潛移默化而不好理性論辯
當然, 當發展到聖人的境界時, 直觀能教人作出一個能如理性一樣, 配合整個社會的判斷

但西方理性主義下, 多主張理性地找出一些能普遍應用的道德律
例如: "如果一個行為令大部份人受最大利益, 就是合付道德"
或 "如果一個比賽, 人人亦接受同樣規舉, 那就是公平"

就算是要求乍見孺子張入於井要去救
理據都唔會索諸同情心

而會說成
由於道德律" 如果你只需付出一丁點就能幫人很大忙, 你就有道德責任去幫"
合理
所以要幫

在西方論理觀中, 在我認識的幾套之中, 除了aristotle以外, 多把compassion, emotion方棄為道德指標
這樣, compassion, 或者同情心有時更被看成阻礙正確作出道德判斷的心理作用了

如果把
"記者在採訪時亦有道德責任去救人" 仍為一道德律作理性分析
由於這會令所有關於災難的報導難以第一時間出街
所以把這道德律看成不理性
從而認為沒有這道德律

我說如果在理性主義下, 他是聖人, 因為他能輕易戰性感性的心理作用(指同情心), 而堅守理性帶來的道德律

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]