|
[> Subject: Each queen is crownwed, and if you were there, you would know, and I bet she won't sell you a video..everything worked out fine...stop trying to cause more drama than there was!
|
Author:
The queens are just fine with their new crowns!
[ Edit | View ]
|
Date Posted: 05:57:25 08/16/06 Wed
>Hey girl!!! The stones in the crowns for the 5 year
>anniversary crown ar AB Stones. We aren't sure if the
>stones in the crowns fromn now on will remain AB or
>will be something other than Purple since the purple
>stone supply has been depleted. I hope we keep the AB
>Stones because those crowns were GORGEOUS!!! Take care
>and I hope you mop the floor up with them at USA. (NT)
>-- Sincerely, Radiah M. Hyatte, Thu - 08.10.06 /
>8:37am
>which USA system is she competing in? (NT) -- former
>Mrs., Thu - 08.10.06 / 10:54am
>I'm competing at Miss Ohio USA next year. I'm taking
>this year off to focus on school and prepare. (NT) --
>Marianna, Thu - 08.10.06 / 11:23am
>Well, please keep me updated on your preparations: you
>know how to reach me...lol!!! You are going to do
>AWESOME... (NT) -- Sincerely, Radiah, Thu - 08.10.06 /
>3:48pm
>The crowns were not at the pageant? What happened and
>how did go over with the ladies? (NT) -- Just
>wondering, no harm, Thu - 08.10.06 / 11:48am
>Everyone completely understood the cause and I believe
>the titleholders were just as happy as clams to win
>anyway. :) If there were any contestants that weren't
>so understanding, I guarantee you would have seen it
>on this board before now. (NT) -- No name, Thu -
>08.10.06 / 12:51pm
>I agree, but as an outsider I was just looking for
>clarification on why they weren't there. I agree if
>people were upset, we would have heard it by now! (NT)
>-- I completely understand that!, Thu - 08.10.06 /
>1:05pm
>What do you mean, the crowns weren't there? Sorry I am
>confused..I didn't see anything written in the thread
>that the crowns weren't there. Could have been an over
>sight in my reading.. (NT) -- confused former mrs.,
>Thu - 08.10.06 / 1:52pm
>Never mind I found it, the old eyes are playing tricks
>on me...Sorry ladies... (NT) -- no longer a confused
>mrs., Thu - 08.10.06 / 2:24pm
>Marianna, why on Earth would it matter and I guess it
>was just killing you that no one really cared or
>mentioned too much about it. They were AB, keeping it
>that way- stone shortage. They all were crowned on
>stage. I hope this seals it up for you. Good luck in
>your future pageants if you choose to compete. (NT) --
>,.,...,......,,.,.,.,.,...., Thu - 08.10.06 / 9:04pm
>I'm sorry I am not Marianna, nor do I know her, but I
>think you were a bit harsh. I was curious about it as
>well. A few of you have said that there is a "stone
>shortage", I wasn't aware that they used real
>amethysts on the crown. That is really cool. How nice
>to have one of those. If it wasn't real amethyst then
>more can be manufactured. I really liked the purple.
>AB is pretty as well, but amethysts are amazing. (NT)
>-- my opinion, Thu - 08.10.06 / 10:39pm
>Hi, I'm not the above poster but I do know, Swarovski
>discontinued that color of stone in those sizes, I
>make costumes and tried to get several different sizes
>in certain colors and it seems that Swarovski
>discontinued a few other colors as well, not sure why,
>My supplier said that Swarovski is coming out with
>some new colors and they are Beautiful. The stones in
>the crown are not real but the crown is absolutely
>gorgeous and now with the AB Stones it even Prettier
>than the purple stones, however I wouldn't mind either
>one. (NT) -- slc, Fri - 08.11.06 / 12:32pm
>There is NO EXCUSE whatsover as to why crowns were not
>ready! MT had a year to order them. (NT) -- Goodness
>gracious, crowns not ready? That cannot be true, Sat -
>08.12.06 / 7:07am
>You were not a contestant, and not a winner, so why is
>this such a big deal for you? It was obviously not a
>big deal for the people that the crowns belong to, so
>why get yourself so worked up and try to get others
>worked up about it? (NT) -- Get a friggin life, Sat -
>08.12.06 / 2:29pm
>Well, it would appear that YOU weren't there...so get
>over it! No one else had an issue. Take it up with
>Maria if you do....everyone else was JUST FINE (NT) --
>You are not a queen so don't stress...that crown won't
>be on YOUR head any time soon., Sun - 08.13.06 /
>9:38am
>So were all 4 queens crowned with a crown or not? (NT)
>-- I'm totally confused now, Sat - 08.12.06 / 4:14pm
>Yes dear, all 4 girls were crowned on stage that
>night. (NT) -- ,.,.,,.,, Sat - 08.12.06 / 8:17pm
>Then why are people saying the crowns weren't ready
>when the winners were crowned with them? Were they
>missing stones, or was one crown used to crown
>everyone, or did last year's queens use their crowns
>for crowning, or what? (NT) -- Still confused, sorry!,
>Sat - 08.12.06 / 10:29pm
>One of the new AB crowns was ready, and it was used to
>crown each queen. So the teen queen was crowned, left
>the stage, and the crown was removed and used for the
>next queen. Probably very few people in the audience
>even noticed. (NT) -- It worked out OK., Sun -
>08.13.06 / 1:45am
>Okay, thanks for explaining that! That was a pretty
>smart move. The new AB crown is gorgeous. Galaxy has
>some of the prettiest crowns I have ever seen. Even
>the smaller state crowns are prettier than some nat'l
>crowns I've seen! (NT) -- No name, Sun - 08.13.06 /
>3:15am
>CROWNS -- No name, Tue - 08.15.06 / 1:50pm
>To put this to rest: EVERYONE of the new International
>Queens left Florida with their new crowns!!! I was
>there when they arrived at the hotel. The entire
>situation with the crowns was explained to us (the
>delegates) and it was a mere misunderstanding about
>the dates of the pageant. Everything worked out in the
>end and we have four (4) amazing new queens, a
>phenomenal director and a fabulous asst. director!!! I
>can't wait to get back on that Galaxy stage next
>year... (NT) -- Sincerely, Radiah Hyatte - Ms. North
>America Galaxy 2006, Tue - 08.15.06 / 2:16pm
>Correction RADIAH, they did NOT leave the pageant or
>Florida with their new crowns!!! However, I agree, the
>subject should be put to rest BUT the director needs
>to make sure this same thing doesn't occur next year.
>ORDER THE CROWNS RIGHT NOW!!! NO EXCUSES! (NT) -- The
>crowns NEED to be there for the new Queens' crowning
>moments!!!, Tue - 08.15.06 / 3:52pm
[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
|
|
Feedback: 