VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11/20/10 6:14pm
Author: David Horowitz
Subject: The Art of Political War for Teaparties

The Art of Political War for Tea Parties – by David Horowitz
Posted by David Horowitz on Dec 1st, 2009

David Horowitz was one of the founders of the New Left in the 1960s and an editor of its largest magazine,Ramparts. He is the author, with Peter Collier, of three best selling dynastic
biographies: The Rockefellers: An American Dynasty (1976); The Kennedys: An American Dream (1984); and The Fords: An American Epic (1987). Looking back in anger at their days in the New Left, he and Collier wrote Destructive Generation
(1989), a chronicle of their second thoughts about the 60s that has
been compared to Whittaker Chambers’ Witness and other classic works
documenting a break from totalitarianism. Horowitz examined this subject
more closely in Radical Son (1996), a memoir tracing his odyssey
from “red-diaper baby” to conservative activist that George Gilder
described as “the first great autobiography of his generation.”









A specter is haunting America – the specter of a people rising. All across the nation Americans are waking up to the threat of a leftist elite determined to fundamentally
change America, push through a socialist agenda, and make every citizen
dependent on the state. The Obama machine is spending trillions of
tax-payer dollars to finance their takeover of the American workplace
and stifle the independence of the American people. But America is
resilient nation, built on the principles of private property and
individual freedom, and the resistance to their socialist plans has
already begun.
In May 2009, just five months into the Obama administration, the people of California launched a tax revolt in the biggest spending state in the nation. So reckless were the leftist Democrats who run
California (and have done so for as long as anyone can remember) that
its deficit alone was larger than the budgets of most other states in
the Union and of many of the nations of the world. Leftwing politicians
don’t cut budgets; they propose new taxes. And California’s leftwing
legislature did just that. But thanks to a constitutional amendment put
in place by the California electorate through the state Initiative
process, California legislators can’t raise taxes without a two-thirds
referendum of the people. So they were forced to hold a special election
in May to appeal to the electorate to pass five new ballot Initiatives
to raise taxes.
But when the votes were counted, all five tax-raising Initiatives had been defeated by 60% margins. Even in San Francisco. A sixth Initiative designed by tax opponents to punish legislators who do not balance the budget passed by a more than 70% margin. Even in San Francisco. If one of the most liberal states in the Union is saying no to the soak-the-public philosophy of leftwing legislators, Obama socialism is
in big trouble.
The revolt in California quickly spread to the entire nation through the efforts of the Tea Parties movement, the most innovative, exciting and powerful grassroots force in the history of American conservatism.
It is vital to the health of this country that the Tea Parties movement
grow. More to the point: it is essential to American survival that the
Tea Parties movement succeed. On the eve of the 2008 presidential
election, Barack Obama said “We are five days away from fundamentally
transforming America.” The Tea Parties movement is the American people saying no to Obama’s plans for revolution.
* * *
A movement without an effective strategy for defeating its opponents cannot succeed. Therefore it is important to reacquaint ourselves with the art of political war.
While Democrats are morally bankrupt and clueless about policy – about what makes things work — they still win elections because they understand a simple fact: American politics is driven by the
romance of the underdog, the story of the little guy who goes up against
the system and triumphs in the end. It is a story about opportunity and
fairness. To win the hearts and minds of the American voter, you have
to tap the emotions the romance of the underdog evokes. Whoever does so
has a winning edge.
America’s heroes are all cut to this common mold. Whether it is George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Davy Crockett, Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Amelia Earhart, Jackie Robinson, Ronald Reagan or Colin Powell,
the theme is always the same: The common man who rises against the odds.
America’s political romance is “Mr. Smith Goes To Washington” to make
things right. It is “Meet John Doe” who speaks for the voiceless. It is
Luke Skywalker who saves the planet by using the good side of the Force
to defeat the Empire. It is the odyssey of individuals who challenge
power, overcome adversity and rise to the top. Everyone in America thinks of themselves as an underdog and aspires to be a hero.
The cause of the underdog wins American hearts because it resonates with our deepest religious and moral convictions of doing good and helping others. And because it is America’s own story. We began as a
small nation, standing up to the world’s most powerful empire. We
dedicated ourselves to the idea that all men are created equal. We are a
nation of immigrants and a generous people who arrived with nothing and
made fortunes in a new world. This is the American Dream.
It’s a story that will get you every time. But at election time, it’s the political left and the Democratic Party who know how to wield it as a political weapon, and Republicans and conservatives generally who
don’t. Of course the Tea Parties have changed all that. And that is
another sign that we are in an extraordinary political moment. The Tea
Parties draw on the heritage of America’s own revolution as an underdog
nation and are the voice of the people, oppressed now by their own
government which is out of control and determined to crush them.
*
In positioning themselves as champions of the under-represented, neglected and oppressed, leftists employ a version of America’s story that they have manufactured through their grip on the media and the academic culture. They have transformed America’s story from an epic of freedom into a tale of racism, exploitation and domination. In their telling, American history is no longer a narrative
of expanding opportunity, of men and women succeeding against the odds.
Instead, it is a Marxist Morality Play about the powerful and their
victims.
In staging their political dramas, progressives invariably claim to speak in the name of America’s alleged “victims.” Every policy of the Democratic Party is presented as a program to help these “victims”—women, children, minorities and the poor. Simultaneously, Democrats describe Republican policies as programs that will injure the weak, ignore the vulnerable, and keep the powerless down.
Republicans play right into the Democrats’ trap because they approach politics as a problem of management. To Republicans, every issue is a management issue—the utility of a tax cut,
the efficiency of a program, the optimal method for running an
enterprise. Republicans talk like businessmen who want a chance to
manage the country so that it will turn a profit.
There is nothing wrong with instituting good policies and running things efficiently or turning a profit. But while Republicans are performing these Gold Star activities, Democrats are engaged in a different kind of drama. They are busy
attacking Republicans as servants of the rich, oppressors of the weak
and defenders of the strong. And enemies of “the people.”
Listen to Mario Cuomo describing Republicans to the Democrats’ 1996 National Convention:
We need to work as we have never done before between now and November 5th to take the Congress back from Newt Gingrich and the Republicans, because ladies and gentlemen, brothers and sisters, the Republicans are the real threat. They are the real threat to our women. They are the real threat to our children. They are the real threat to clean water, clean air and the rich landscape of America.
Mario Cuomo knows the language of political war.
Democrats connect emotionally with people’s fears and concerns. The appeal to help the underdog and defend the victim resonates with all Americans. This is because Americans are a fair-minded people. Most
successful Americans came from humble origins themselves. They want to
help others. They want everyone to have the chance to succeed.
So do Republicans and conservatives. But they rarely connect their policies and principles to this political romance.
There’s a good reason for this. Conservatives are busy defending the real America against the left’s attacks and the anti-American caricature they have constructed. Conservatives know that America is still a land
of opportunity and freedom, and that nobody in America is really
“oppressed.” (Otherwise, why would poor, black, Hispanic and Asian
minorities be desperately seeking to come here? Why wouldn’t they be
leaving instead?)
But politics isn’t just about reality. If it were, good principles and good policies would win every time. It’s about images and symbols, and the emotions they evoke. This is a battle that conservatives
generally lose.
In the romance of the victim, as progressives stage it, Republicans and conservatives are always on the side of the bad guys—the powerful, the male, the white and the wealthy. It’s easy to see how patriotism
plays into this trap. Defending America is readily mis-represented as an
attitude that says: “I’m all right Jack, so you should be too.” The
left relishes the opportunity to smear patriots as members of the
selfish party instead of as defenders of individual freedom.
Ann Coulter has described the motto of the left as this: “Speak loudly and carry a small victim.” For the Democrats, the romance of the victim stirs the souls of their supporters and energizes their base.
Equally important, it provides the nuclear warhead of their political
attack. Conservatives are targeted victimizers, and leftists as the
champions of the oppressed. Learning how to turn this around will turn
around the political war as well.
Going On The Attack
Fortunately, conservatives can use the left-wing attack against them. Contrary to the left’s view, America is not a land of victims. It is a highly mobile society, with a citizenry that aspires upwards through the system, not against it.
Conservatives can also turn the left’s oppression myth around, and aim its guns at them. In fact, using the romance of the underdog against the left is the best way to neutralize their attack.
The way to do it is to recognize that the most powerful forces obstructing opportunity for poor and minority Americans, the most powerful forces oppressing them, are progressives, the Democratic
Party, and their political creation—the welfare state.
There is really nothing new in this idea. Conservatives already oppose the programs of the left as obstacles to the production of wealth and barriers to opportunity for all Americans. What is new is the idea
of connecting this analysis to a political strategy that will give
conservatives a decisive edge in battle—that will neutralize the class,
race and gender warfare attacks of the political left.
The Principles
Here are the principles of political war that the left understands but conservatives do not:
1. Politics is war conducted by other means
2. Politics is a war of position
3. In political wars the aggressor usually prevails
4. Position is defined by fear and hope
5. The weapons of politics are symbols evoking fear and hope
6. Victory lies on the side of the people
Here are the principles explained:
Politics is war conducted by other means.
In political warfare you do not fight just to prevail in an argument, but to destroy the enemy’s fighting ability. Conservatives often seem to regard political combats as they would a debate before the Oxford
Political Union, as though winning depends on rational arguments and
carefully articulated principles. But the audience of politics is not
made up of Oxford dons, and the rules are entirely different.
For starters, you have only 30 seconds to make your point. Even if you had time to develop an argument, the audience you need to reach (the undecided and those in the middle who are not paying much attention)
wouldn’t get it. Your words would go over some of their heads and the
rest would not even hear them (or be quickly forgotten) amidst the
bustle and pressure of daily life. Worse, while you’ve been making your
argument the other side has already painted you as a mean-spirited,
border-line racist controlled by religious zealots, securely in the
pockets of the rich. Nobody who sees you this way is going to listen to
you in any case. You’re politically dead.
Politics is war. Don’t forget it.
Politics is a war of position.
In war there are two sides: friends and enemies. Your task is to define yourself as the friend of as large a constituency compatible with your principles as possible, while defining your
opponent as their enemy wherever and whenever you can. The act of
defining combatants is analogous to the military concept of choosing the
terrain of battle.
Choose the terrain that makes the fight as loaded in your favor as possible. But be careful. American politics takes place in a pluralistic framework, where constituencies are diverse and often in conflict.
“Fairness” and “tolerance” are the formal rules of democratic
engagement. If you appear mean-spirited, nasty, or too judgmental, it
will make the task easier for your opponent to define you as a threat,
and therefore as “the enemy.” (See principle 4)
In political warfare, the aggressor usually prevails.
Conservatives often pursue a strategy of waiting for the other side to attack. In football this is known as a “prevent defense.” In politics it is the strategy of losers.
Aggression is advantageous because politics is a war of position. Position is defined by images that stick. By striking first you can define the issues and your adversary. Defining the opposition is the
decisive move in all political war. Other things being equal, whoever is
put on the defensive generally winds up on the losing side.
In attacking your opponent, take care to do it right. Going negative increases the risk of being defined as an enemy. Therefore, it can be counter-productive. Ruling out the negative, however, can incur an even
greater risk.
Position is defined by fear and hope.
The twin emotions of politics are fear and hope. Those who provide people with hope become their friends; those who inspire fear become enemies. Of the two, hope is the better choice. By offering people hope
and yourself as its provider, you show your better side and maximize
your potential support.
But fear is a powerful and indispensable weapon. If your opponent defines you negatively enough, he will diminish your ability to offer hope. This is why Democrats are so determined to portray conservatives
as mean-spirited, and hostile to minorities, the middle class and the
poor.
It is important to work away from the negative images your opponent wants to pin on you. If you know you are going to be attacked as intolerant and bigoted it’s a good idea to lead with a position that is
inclusive and fair-minded. If you are going to be framed as
mean-spirited and ungenerous, it’s a good idea to put on a smile and
lead with symbols that project generosity and charity.
The weapons of politics are symbols evoking fear and hope.
Conservatives lose a lot of political battles because they come across as hard-edged, scolding, scowling and sanctimonious. A good rule of thumb says be just the opposite. You have to convince people you care
about them before they’ll care about what you have to say.
When you do get to speak, don’t forget that a sound-bite is all you have. Whatever you have to say, make sure to say it loud and clear. Keep it simple and keep it short. (A slogan is always better). Repeat it
often. Get it on television. Radio is good, but with few exceptions,
only television reaches a public that is electorally significant. In
politics, television is reality.
Of course, you have a base of supporters who will listen for hours to what you have to say if that’s what you want. In the battles facing you, they will play an important role. Therefore, what you say to them
is also important. But it is not going to decide elections. The
audiences that will determine your fate are audiences that you will
first have to persuade. You will have to find a way to reach them and
get them to listen. And get them to support you. With these audiences,
you will never have time for real arguments or proper analyses.
Images—symbols and sound-bites—will always prevail.
Therefore it is absolutely essential to focus your message and repeat it over and over again. Lack of focus will derail your message. If you make too many points, your message will be diffused and nothing will get
through. The result will be the same as if you had made no point at
all.
Leftists have a party line. When they are fighting an issue they focus their agenda. During legislative battles, every time a Democrat steps in front of the cameras there is at least one line in his speech
that is shared with his colleagues. “Tax breaks for the wealthy at the
expense of the poor,” is one example. Repetition insures that the
message will get through.
When Republicans speak during legislative battles, they all march to a different drummer. There are many messages instead of one. One message is a sound-bite. Many messages are an indecipherable noise. The result
of many messages is that there is no message.
Symbols and sound-bites determine the vote. These are what hit people in the gut before they have time to think. And these are what people remember. Symbols are the impressions that last, and what ultimately
defines you.
Carefully chosen words and phrases are more important than paragraphs, speeches, party platforms and manifestos. What you project through images is what you are.
Victory lies on the side of the people.
This is the bottom line for each of the principles and for all of the principles. You must define yourself in ways that people understand. You must give people hope in your victory, and make them fear the
victory of your opponent. You can accomplish both by identifying
yourself and your issues with the underdog and the victim, with
minorities and the disadvantaged, with the ordinary Janes and Joes.
This is what leftists do best, and conservatives often neglect to do at all. Every political statement by a leftist is an effort to say: “We care about women, children, minorities, working Americans and the poor.”
And: “Conservatives are mean-spirited, serve the rich and don’t care
about you.” This is the left’s strategy of political war. If
conservatives are to win the political war we have to turn these images
around.
We also have to make our campaigns a cause. During the Cold War, conservatives had a cause. They were saving the country from Communism. It was a cause that resonated at every level with the American people.
The poorest citizen understood that their freedom was at stake in making
sure that conservatives were elected to conduct the nation’s defense.
In a democracy, the cause that fires up passions is the cause of the people. That is why politicians like to run “against Washington” and against anything that represents the “powers that be.” As the left has
shown, the idea of justice is a powerful motivator. It will energize the
troops and fuel the campaigns that are necessary to win the political
war. Conservatives believe in economic opportunity and individual
freedom. The core of our ideas is freedom and justice for all. If we can
make this intelligible to the American electorate, we will become the
majority again and stop the socialist juggernaut that threatens our
American future.

http://frontpagemag.com/2009/12/01/the-art-of-political-war-for-tea...
Tags: conservative, david, hero, horowitz, leftist, party, people, political, progressives, tea

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.