VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22:17:13 02/26/09 Thu
Author: DZR
Author Host/IP: 83.157.154.210
Subject: Ohhhhhh ... let look again
In reply to: Gabs 's message, "I meant the subjects 20 and 21, the featured women" on 21:48:17 02/26/09 Thu

Heh. I thought you were talking about European dress sizes, and I was thinkng "Wow, hey have no relation to UK dress sizes at all!" That's why I thought you were being all down on your size or something. I mean you chicks are fucking crazy about that shit, so I just assumed.

Actually I think both 20 and 21 are equally, differently, moderately attractive. 20 is definitely not bizarrely thin or super fit. She's just slim. (22 and 24 are the prettiest in my opinion.)

Also, bear in mind that my perception of what is normal has almost certainly been coloured by living in Paris for the last 6 or 7 months, where fat people are illegal and are shot on sight.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Not 23? -- Gabs, 22:25:44 02/26/09 Thu [1] (85.3.50.33)

She looks like your type. ;p


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Ew. She has fake boobs and looks like a porn star. -- DZR, 22:31:52 02/26/09 Thu [1] (83.157.154.210)

Thanks a bunch. You're the one with the date with Snoop Dogg lined up.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Eminem, if anything. -- Gabs, 22:35:42 02/26/09 Thu [1] (85.3.50.33)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> God knows what you would think of me if 22 and 24 are your favourites -- andypandy, 22:31:51 02/26/09 Thu [1] (82.30.76.72)

I mean, I keep myself as fit as possible but I'm still a brit size 12/14 which I consider to be normal but those girls must be a 6 or something, saying that I after I had the twins when I was 17 I lost loads of weight and went down to a size 8, much too skinny and my frame was very similar to those two. By the way if you look at number 9 she is the spitting image of my friend Paula naked frame and all, very slender and beautiful but not bony with a nice pair of little boobs.

I hate her


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> I think I like 16 best -- Gabs, 22:38:07 02/26/09 Thu [1] (85.3.50.33)

9's hipbones scare me. :(


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Yeah no love handles........... -- andypandy, 22:41:35 02/26/09 Thu [1] (82.30.76.72)

which always come in handy ;-)


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Yeah, 16 is just cool -- DZR, 22:50:11 02/26/09 Thu [1] (83.157.154.210)

She's kinda funky, without looking like she's trying too hard (which some of the other funkier ones do on the site), and she just seems to have lots of character. Whilst she doesn't have the prettiest face or the most amazing body she's actually really attractive. Like I said, it's the whole person that's attractive or not, not their bits, although I fear that I am in a minority of men who think that sometimes.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> You don't get it -- DZR, 22:43:18 02/26/09 Thu [1] (83.157.154.210)

It's just them as a whole -- not their size, or their boobs, or their legs, or arse or whatever. 22 and 24 just struck me as the prettiest. Bear in mind that I also think Scarlett Johansson and Christina Hendricks (Mad Men, Firefly) are unbelievable hot.

12/14 is a normal size. Some women are naturally skinny (Kate Moss, Keira Knightley) and they look great the way they are. Some women starve themselves into skinniness and just look terrible (plenty of Hollywood actresses for example).

I actually have quite broad tastes regarding what I find attractive in women. But I do find being overweight for one's frame unattractive -- it just suggests bad diet, bad lifestyle.

No 9 doesn't do a lot for me. Not sure why.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Well I'm relieved to hear I'm "normal" :-) -- andypandy, 23:04:44 02/26/09 Thu [1] (82.30.76.72)

although I certainly don't feel it sometimes! And I do get what you're saying actually, I have equally broad tastes in what I find attractive in men, I mean I go on about liking big hunky broody guys but really I find myself attracted to many different types, you either find someone attractive or you don't, whatever their body type.

I must admit I do envy naturally slender women though.


[ Edit | View ]


[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.