VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:05:57 02/12/10 Fri
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Re: AK has always let 14 and over compete so 16 is still considered.ok
In reply to: 's message, "AK has always let 14 and over compete so 16 is still considered.ok" on 19:49:44 02/12/10 Fri

According to the paperwork for the Michigan pageant, there was a cutoff.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> Re: Well that is BS and it should have been on the PW. -- Anonymous, 06:49:37 02/15/10 Mon [1]

The PW CLEARLY states up to 13 years old. Not 16. I guess the 16 year old had to win ultimate because there was no age division for her to win in.


[ Edit | View ]

[> [> [> [> When will you people learn? You WERE warned! -- Anonymous, 11:50:26 02/15/10 Mon [1]


[ Edit | View ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.