回公仔佬和otl -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

13:41:12 05/15/26 Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: 回公仔佬和otl

Author:
蔡俊浩

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 01:48:56 03/15/07 Thu
In reply to: 公仔佬 's message, "有趣有趣" on 17:57:59 03/14/07 Wed

對不起, 手快打錯.

我是想說先秦不用

if a then b

而是用

(not a or b.)

非a 即b

兩者的邏輯結構相同.
沒有了"if then" 的這一個notion, 而用了not, 和 or 這兩個notion合用, 組成邏輯和if..then相同的, 即少了一個notion

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: 修正
Author: 蔡俊浩 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 02:18:50 03/15/07 Thu 我又講錯左我是想說: 先秦不用 a or b 而是用 if not a then b 非a則b 即是用"not" 和"if..then" 兩個notion 兩者邏輯結構相同用兩個英文已有的notion, 代替一個英文的notion