Re: 回pad -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

16:19:03 05/15/26 Fri

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re: 回pad

Author:
Pad student

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:46:12 03/16/07 Fri
In reply to: 蔡俊浩 's message, "回pad" on 01:57:16 03/15/07 Thu

>以下是假設部份
>胎是人,
>故墮胎是殺人,
>殺人是不合乎道德
>
>以下是結論部份
>墮胎是不合乎道德.
>
>
>關於如何評估一個類比是否合宜, 可以參考這個.
> >href="http://philosophy.hku.hk/think/arg/analogy.php">h
>ttp://philosophy.hku.hk/think/arg/analogy.php
>
>你是師弟嗎, 不用大謙卑, 持平就行了,
>如果我想帶出一觀點的話,我有責任為自己的論點解釋,
>而不是你有責任學過我所學過的.

我明白師兄想說出一個矛盾性的關係
而你所設的例子我也看過類似的
我只是想指出第一點可能有假設性的錯誤
"墮胎是合乎道德的"

以下是假設部份
>>胎是人,
>>故墮胎是殺人,
>>殺人是不合乎道德
>>
>>以下是結論部份
>>墮胎是不合乎道德.

以我小量的認識
if a, then b
a
therefore b
這樣說會否簡單些??

假設:
殺人是不合乎道德
墮胎是殺人
墮胎是不合乎道德

雖然意思上一樣
但看上會比較簡單

我不是對師兄的理論感問題
而是在師兄提及的矛盾性中感興趣
因為我覺得..邏輯學可以使用假設性問題
但在於對矛盾性的思想上
我覺得利用假設會令思考者有錯誤的結論

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 回pad
Author: 蔡俊浩 [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 01:24:19 03/19/07 Mon 我不太明白, 可否再表達一次?