VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]23 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 19:14:20 09/07/06 Thu
Author: Surest path to success (tcresources)
Subject: Surest path to success
In reply to: 4Life - Professional Networkers Unite All over the world! 's message, "4Life - Professional Networkers Unite All over the world!" on 19:03:58 09/07/06 Thu

Surest path to success


Professional Networkers Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
tcresources



Joined: 01 Sep 2004
Posts: 7
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Malaysia.
Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2006 8:23 pm Post subject: Surest path to success

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Surest path to success

Dr. Keith B. Laggos

The surest path to success has been used in many industries. This method has helped numerous individuals to become successful in those industries. Yet, no industry exists that is better suited to using this surest path to success than the direct sales/network marketing.
All sponsors are supposed to help, support and train the people they introduce and sponsor into their direct sales business. Some sponsors have more experience than others. Some sponsors are willing to do more than others. Some sponsors rely more on company trainers and programs. Still other sponsors will either tell you what to do or provide marketing programs in which you have an option to participate or not.
And of course, there are sponsors that believe direct sales is a numbers game and not a people building business. They sponsor as many distributors as possible and leave them to fend for themselves in hope that, if they sponsor enough people, a few will succeed and make them rich. They are the type of sponsors that often give this industry a bad reputation. They are the antithesis of the type of person you want as a sponsor.
Choose a personal mentor
The surest path of success goes beyond choosing a good sponsor that will help, support and train you. You want to choose a personal mentor.
A warning is appropriate first. There have been several people in the past that have set themselves up as mentors. They offer their services as a mentor for a fee, often a substantial fee. Some of these people have achieved great success as a distributor. A couple of these so-called mentors have not. They entered the industry as a consultant or an editor and declared themselves an industry guru. What they have to offer as mentors is very questionable. It is likely those who are getting paid as mentors gain more financially than those whom they mentor.
So who makes a good mentor? A good mentor will have most of the following qualities and characteristics:
• They will have achieved the highest level of success within their company.
• They may have been successful in more than one program within their career.
• A good mentor will have helped several distributors become successful.
• A good mentor will have many people who believe in him or her and contribute their success directly to their mentor.
• A good mentor is more dedicated to helping a person grow and succeed than being concerned about how much he or she will earn from the person being helped.
• A good mentor is demanding, but also is patient.
• A good mentor will lead by example.
• A good mentor will start by teaching what to do and how to do it. They then will follow and critique your performance until your skill level rises to at least match his or hers.
A good mentor will do more than a good sponsor. A good sponsor will help you learn and grow your direct sales/network marketing business. A good mentor will also help you grow personally.
Often, a mentor will consider you as one of his or her, “children.” It does not matter what the ages are. Most parents want their children to grow, mature and become better than them selves. That is what also drives a good mentor.
Obviously, not every one can be sponsored by a top-level distributor in a company. A top-level distributor may not even make a good mentor. Most people do not have access to a top-level distributor when they are introduced to a program. Furthermore, a person can only really be a good mentor for a few people at a time.
Look upline, use criteria
So how do you find and obtain a good mentor if your sponsor is not? First, you must locate someone that meets the above criteria. Usually, there will be someone further in your upline that does meet the criteria. If not, there is most likely someone in the sales force or corporate management that is. Obviously, someone within your upline organization has more incentive to take on the role of being your mentor. But if you review the criteria for a good mentor, you will realize that financial considerations are not the primary motives of mentoring someone. In fact, being a mentor can provide one of life’s greatest rewards, self-edification, which is the highest level of Maslow’s Hierarchy of Human Needs.
What you need to do is present yourself as a good protégé. However, if there is no one within the company that will make a good mentor, then the chances that the company will have long-term success is very unlikely. You may want to consider fining a good mentor and a good company. In any case, you must become a good protégé.
A good protégé will have the following characteristics. A good protégé:
• Will be willing to follow directions.
• Will be willing to work hard.
• Will make and keep a commitment.
• Will be dedicated to his or her mentor and to the business.
• Will maintain a life-long relationship with their mentor.
• Will respect and honor his or her mentor’s time.
• Will be willing to be critiqued and try to improve.
• Will be willing to become a mentor in the future to someone else.
• Has a reasonable chance of becoming successful.
• Will support his or her mentor.
• Will be sincere.
Most mentors will mentor someone who they believe have the potential, desire and commitment to become successful and will become leaders and good mentors themselves. You must be that kind of person. Tell your potential mentor you want to emulate him or her. That is one of the greatest compliments possible and is often what a mentor desires. You must be willing to become a mentor in your mentor’s sales organization even if he or she is not in yours. In other words you must be willing to become a good mentor yourself.
Finally, you will only benefit to the level of effort that you put into the relationship and your business. However, if you are serious about becoming a successful distributor, finding a good mentor is the surest path to success.


Keith Laggos has been in the direct sales industry for 35 years, half of that time as a successful distributor. He is one of only three people worldwide chosen for the Hall of Fame Award. He is president of a 21-year-old, multilevel company, which he founded. He is a board member of an industry association as well as other companies, an expert witness and an industry consultant.
His publishing company is the largest in the industry and produces Network Marketing Business Journal, formerly Money Maker’s Monthly, the first direct sales college textbook, Direct Sales – An Overview and Higher Than The Highest Mountain, an inspirational, warm and humorous fictional account of how a Christian family’s love and faith overcome all while facing everyday challenges in today’s society. It also provides a positive example of how network marketing helps families at various aspects and junctures of their lives. Most recently, he has published How to Recruit & Sell in an Over-commercialized Society, a how-to textbook on marketing. The Multi-Level Marketing International Association (MLMIA) has awarded Laggos and Network Marketing Business Journal’s predecessor Money Maker’s Monthly, several prestigious awards, including its Global Vision Award, Supplier of the Year and President’s Spirit Award, among others.
Laggos has also been published and quoted in other publications and academic journals around the world. Laggos has a bachelor’s degree in math and computer science, a master’s of business degree in management and marketing, a master’s degree in economics and a doctorate (abd) in public policy analysis and a doctorate in business economics.




http://s-resources1.cjb.net/
_________________
CONTACT INFORMATION
ID# 6014772
TC Associates
TC Brian Yap
48 , Jalan Limau Purut , Bangsar ,
Kuala Lumpur, FT 59000
603-56333751
6016 6812063
tcassociates@myway.com
URL - http://realsuccess4life.com/6014772.html

Back to top


drhalim



Joined: 15 Sep 2004
Posts: 5
Location: Okayama , Japan .
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 4:53 am Post subject: FTC stifles free enterprise,economy and civil rights

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FTC stifles free enterprise,economy and civil rights



I hope you are as alarmed and angry enough to be moved to action after reading this as you should be! However, as important as it is that you understand the severity and wrongfulness of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC’s) proposed regulation and the need for you to take an immediate, rational response, it is also important for you to understand that I believe the direct sales industry will unite and prevail. In its present form, the FTC’s proposed regulation would be devastating, if not fatal, to the direct sales industry. However, with the full resources and multiple-pronged approach of the Direct Selling Association (DSA), Multi-Level Marketing International Association (MLMIA), Direct Selling Women’s Alliance (DSWA) and Network Marketing Business Journal (NMBJ), and with your support, we believe the FTC will conclude to either not implement this unwarranted regulation or very significantly modify it or exempt the direct selling industry from it.
It is absolutely essential that companies, distributors and even vendors take action and support the industry associations with thoughtful letters and financial donations, as requested. (The MLMIA is collecting donations to support Jonathan Emord at 949-854-0484.) I don’t care if you are or are not members of any particular association. This is a time when we need to unite as an industry and support all of those who are working to resolve this issue.
The stated objective of the proposed FTC regulation is to help the FTC prevent and regulate against fraud and deceptive practices. Of course NMBJ and the industry associations also champion that endeavor. However, the FTC already has all of the legislation and regulations required to accomplish that. In fact, the FTC cannot keep up with known or suspected violators now. Perhaps, the FTC hopes this regulation will provide a tool that allows them to close down suspected perpetrators of fraud or deceptive practices without having to prove their cases. This is wrong. It violates the constitutional philosophy and the right of a fair trial. We have a right to conduct commerce under the U.S. Constitution. I believe the proposed regulation will impede that right. It will have the effect of closing legitimate businesses without due course. The proposed regulation, as written, uses a nuclear bomb to kill a mosquito. In essence, the proposed regulation will greatly harm the society that the FTC is claiming to protect.
The devastation of the direct sales industry and other income opportunities would throw the entire economy into a downward spiraling recession, possibly resulting in a depression. This is from an administration that claims to champion small business and the free enterprise system.
The agency that is trying to pass such damaging regulation, the FTC, is also the agency that has worked so hard in creating the do-not-call list and other regulations to protect our privacy. However, the FTC’s proposed regulation completely ignores such concerns. In fact, it creates “do-call” lists and forces people to be on them if they desire to earn income.
If you are not aware of the regulation that I’m discussing here, you may want to review the article that appeared on the front page of the June 2006 issue of NMBJ, mailed May 1st. You can find that article and the entire regulation on our Web site, www.NMBJ.com. You will also want to read the article with the exclusive interview with the DSA’s legal counsel in this issue or the lawyer’s articles in this issue – Jonathan Emord, Gerald P. Nehra and Spencer Reese. I will not take the space to duplicate that information here, but instead will discuss the ramifications of the proposed regulation as written. I will also provide some suggestions for an intelligent response that everyone should consider.
Another disturbing fact is how the DSA says it was surprised by the language and timing of the proposed regulation. The DSA has been working with the FTC for about a decade on this issue, including the language of such a regulation. Either the FTC judges the DSA and the industry to be inconsequential or the DSA is working in collusion with the FTC. If the latter is the case, they would be acting surprised and pledging to do all that it can but to only come up with minor compromises. Why? The DSA receives the vast majority of its income from a dozen or so large companies who would love to see all of their current and future competition curtailed, if not eliminated. This regulation would certainly act as a monopoly barrier for all but the largest companies.
Either scenario is too demoralizing to comprehend. I personally cannot believe the latter is true. It would be devastating, if when we need the DSA the most, it is working against the needs of the entire industry, except the few member industry giants. Pray for this not to be so!
The DSA implied another scenario. They believed that the FTC author of the proposed regulation came from the FTC’s franchise department and did not understand direct sales.
Although it is obviously true, there are a few problems with this scenario. First, the FTC knew his background and expertise when they assigned him. Second, the proposal committee had the DSA’s input and still published the proposal as is. Most troubling, government agencies tend not to want to admit that they are wrong. They often forge forward once they have taken a chance rather than being embarrassed or admit a mistake.
I still personally prefer to believe this scenario, although perhaps out of blind hope. That is why I encourage everyone to support the DSA for its short-term compromise strategy, but support the MLMIA for its long-term objective and strategy.
Regulation writers don’t even understand our industry
The writers of the proposed FTC income opportunity statute demonstrated their lack of understanding of this industry. In supporting documents they stated that there were only 150 direct sales companies. They felt the requirement of having a prospect provided full disclosure of every lawsuit, whether civil or criminal, with substance or frivolous, won, lost or dropped, lodged against or from the company, its owners, its executives or the representative during the last 10 years would only generate about 35,000 pieces of paper. This full disclosure would have to include full income disclosures. The disclosure would also have to include a list with name and phone numbers of the nearest 10 representatives to the prospect’s home address from the past three years, whether those 10 representatives are active or not. The prospect would have to sign a receipt of that disclosure and wait seven days to join. For a minute, forget how impossible it would be to administer such a ridiculous and overbearing requirement. The fact that the FTC would put into writing the above statistics about the direct sales industry should be an embarrassment to them.
There are over 2,000 U.S. direct sales companies with about 14 million distributors at any given time. The U.S. direct sales industry grows by about 500,000 distributors a year. In addition, the turnover is at least 50 percent a year. This means that at least 7.5 million new distributors join a direct sales opportunity in the United States a year. Although experienced representatives are more efficient, it probably requires an average of 10 presentations to prospects for every one person recruited. This would require about 75 million disclosure statements and receipts for the direct sales industry. Millions more could be generated for other types of distributorships, vendors and licensed income opportunities. Each disclosure could be several pages long. This would result in billions of sheets of paper equivalent to the destruction of a forest. How could the Office of Management and Budget, which is supposed to be reducing paper work, allow this?
Above, I stated that the proposed FTC regulation as written would create a severe recession. I will now explain. The DSA reports that the direct sales industry generates over $30 billion, at wholesale, in sales. The DSA statistics are a bit conservative because they do not include most of the industry’s companies, they do however include most of the larger companies in their statistics. According to a recent study, the economic impact of these sales is $72 billion. This impact includes the impact on the manufacturers and vendors of the industry. When expanded to the multiple times each dollar earned is spent (this is called the multiplier effect in economics) the economical loss of the direct sales industry would be much greater.
In economics, the multiplier effect does not initially consider the effect of savings and the government spending of the tax dollars generated. All would agree, that government spending has much less of an economic impact than business and individual spending. In fact, in my doctoral dissertation, I agued that entrepreneurs, such as in direct sales, have a greater impact and thus a higher multiplier effect on the economy. However, when you consider the government’s and entrepreneurs’ impact on the economy, it would further increase the economic impact of the direct sales industry.
Now add to the impact of destroying the direct sales industry to that of the damage from destroying other income opportunities by the proposed regulation. The results would be the loss of hundreds of billions of dollars from the U.S. economy, including billions and billions of tax dollars. This would represent four to six percent of the gross national product (GNP). This loss would occur within months after the new regulations are implemented, if implemented as is. It would throw the economy in to a deep recession. People would lose their homes and be forced into bankruptcies that were not even involved in an income opportunity.
These impacts do not even include the impact of the loss of many life-enhancing and life-saving products that the direct sales industry introduces and offers. The effects of losing many of the direct sales health products that help with health, including weight management, would have a large economic impact too.
Futile
Most all experts would agree that there are already enough laws and regulations on the books. So, why does the FTC want this overbearing and devastating regulation? As I stated earlier, perhaps because it will provide a means for the FTC to easily fine and levy technicalities against a company without having to find or prove any real wrongdoing. I have become very skeptical about all of the quasi-government agencies. So I have to ask, is the motive of the FTC proposed regulation to give the FTC a means to extensively and legally extort money from more companies and distributors? Are they recklessly damaging entrepreneurship in the United States, free enterprise, the economy and especially direct sales to pursue their own self-interest?
Of course, enterprising direct sales companies and distributors will try to minimize the effects of the proposed regulation if it does pass substantially as now written. They will probably sign everyone up initially as preferred customers for seven days and then allow them to submit their recruits. There may be some predating or postdating of applications and disclosures. This will make the stated objectives of the FTC futile. In fact, the scam artists will not comply and the legitimate companies will be put out of business. And most prospects probably won’t read or understand the disclosures anyway.
However, it will not lower the damage to direct selling significantly. The added administration and logistics burden will be horrendous. The amount of paper work will tear down many forests. Storage and administration costs will bankrupt most companies and deter entrepreneurship in the United States. Privacy rights will be ignored and trampled. The distributor list is one of the most valuable proprietary assets of any direct sales company. Under this regulation, companies will be forced to divulge who their distributors are by geographic location, 10 distributors at a time. If you want to know whom the people local in direct sales are, just go to your local competitors and ask for a disclosure statement. How many people would be reluctant to join a direct sales opportunity if they knew they are opening themselves up to such harassments?
Remember, direct sales opportunities do not usually require investments of tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars such as franchises or vending distributorships. They usually only require a sales kit for under $100. The rest of the purchases are for personal consumption and the company usually fulfills customer orders for the distributor. The burden and damage of the proposed FTC regulation is simply not justified. This is especially true when you consider the stated objectives are probably going to be bypassed, making them futile. The only outcome will probably be to initially line the FTC budgets and then devastate the direct sales and other opportunity income industries along with the economy.
Obviously, we cannot let this happen. You cannot let this happen. Write the FTC a clear and rational letter. Tell them what the effect of the proposed regulation would have on your personal direct sales business. Tell the FTC how this would affect your family’s income and standard of living. Tell them why you think this regulation is wrong and harmful. Be professional and type it if you can. Provide a copy to your company and keep a copy for your records. Send this letter electronically to the FTC’s site at https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-bizopNPR/. Or you can send your letter electronically via the DSA’s Web site at www.dsa.org. On the DSA’s home page, you can click on the red lettering “Get answers to your questions about the FTC’s Proposed Rule …,” which will take you to an information page with to direct links to FTC at the top of the page, as well as near the bottom. It must be received by July 17th, 2006.
Donate as much as you can to the MLMIA. The NMBJ will keep you informed on developments on our Web site, www.NMBJ.com, and in future issues. Companies should join the associations or at least support them. Distributors can join the MLMIA or the DSWA or at least support them.
This regulation may take nine months to two years to pass and be implemented. We need to be sure that if it does, it is in a form that will not devastate the direct sales industry and the U.S. economy.

http://www.nmbj.com/keithftc.asp
_________________
BIOBANK CO., LTD. 601 Park Square SHOWA, 1-7-15, Omote-cho, Okayama-shi, Okayama 700-0822, Japan Phone : +81 86 801 2231 Fax : +81 86 222 0622 E-mail: biobank@omx.co.jp

Back to top


danielempire



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Tahiti , Hawaii
Posted: Tue Jul 04, 2006 8:38 pm Post subject: United Subang Jaya Web Forum

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

12-02-2004, 09:07 PM
uchangeng
Budiman Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: USJ
Posts: 948

Corruption and politics.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A senior cabinet minister in the Federal Government under probe by the ACA faces corruption charges in an open court!

Ex MD of a state own multi-million steel company finally arrested on corruption charges.

All the above in one week.

Going by the amount of money involved(running into billions RM) and the extent of the corruption charges, the public can see how corruptible our current political system can be.

Bringing to court individual politikus like this one is but scratching the tip of an iceberg. There are more that slipped away undetected, getting away with billions of the public funds.

People like that are supposedly religious, faithful and God fearing adults, at least in the eyes of the public. Who know what they have been up to until they are cought!

Will we ever have a system that is transparent enough to deter such degree of corruption?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by uchangeng : 14-02-2004 at 01:11 AM.

uchangeng
View Public Profile
Send a private message to uchangeng
Find all posts by uchangeng
Add uchangeng to Your Buddy List

#2 IP: 210.187.114.110 14-02-2004, 01:22 AM
Left 4th Finger
SETIAKawan Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SJ
Posts: 32

Democracy = Higher Level of Corruption?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I was just wondering whether the democratic system or the capitalistic system actually encourages corruption... I think it does magnify the extent of it since one cannot rely alone on charisma to win votes. $$$ talks louder in most instances. At least, the people have a say... sorry, i'm am rambling in the wee hours of the morning.

Left 4th Finger
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Left 4th Finger
Find all posts by Left 4th Finger
Add Left 4th Finger to Your Buddy List

#3 IP: 210.186.60.186 14-02-2004, 12:52 PM
uchangeng
Budiman Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: USJ
Posts: 948

18 more high profile ACA cases against prominant public figures, including politicians, are coming, said Datuk Rais Yatim.

I hope this time around, Pak Lah really clean up the house. Restore some respect to our political system.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last edited by uchangeng : 15-02-2004 at 12:46 AM.

uchangeng
View Public Profile
Send a private message to uchangeng
Find all posts by uchangeng
Add uchangeng to Your Buddy List

#4 IP: 129.15.30.42 17-02-2004, 02:35 AM
Quicksilver
Kawan Baru Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Penang
Posts: 13



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

can someone please explain how did they do the corruption deeds?In layman terms.

How did a person in charge of steel indusrty "telan" government money and how did kasitah the politician too commited corruption?
__________________
qs

Quicksilver
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Quicksilver
Find all posts by Quicksilver
Add Quicksilver to Your Buddy List

#5 IP: 203.121.32.2 17-02-2004, 01:25 PM
lord
Budiman Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USJ 12
Posts: 992

The Star - 17/02/04


Ex-PNB CEO Shaharin charged with CBT

Update from The Star News Desk

KUALA LUMPUR: Former Perbadanan Nasional Bhd chief executive officer Shaharin Shaharudin has been charged with two counts of criminal breach of trust involving a total of RM462,900.

Shaharin, 46, claimed trial to both charges before Sessions Court Judge Nursilah Adzmi here today.

In the first charge, Shaharin is alleged to have committed CBT involving a budget of RM460,000 to purchase two Proton Perdana V6s, one Proton Perdana Executive V6 2.0(A) and an Inokom Permas van.

He is alleged to have committed the offence at the PNB headquarters at the 9th floor of Menara Dato Onn, PWTC between Jan 8, 2001 and March 19, 2001.

In the second charge, Shaharin of Bandar Utama in Petaling Jaya is alleged to have committed CBT in the purchase of sports equipment worth RM2,900 at the same place between April 18, 2001 and April 27, 2001.

Former PNB General Manager (Corporate Services) Mislina Hanim Ibrahim, 44, was jointly charged with committing the second offence with Shaharin.

Nursilah fixed bail at RM15,000 with one surety for each of the accused. She also ordered them to surrender their international passports to the court and fixed trial for Aug 16 to 20.
__________________
To Fly Like An Eagle
You Cannot Think Like A Turkey

lord
View Public Profile
Send a private message to lord
Visit lord's homepage!
Find all posts by lord
Add lord to Your Buddy List

#6 IP: 203.106.140.79 18-02-2004, 11:44 PM
uchangeng
Budiman Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: USJ
Posts: 948

Call themselves religious, even pray in the public, long prayers, behind our back, God knows what they are up to.

How could they "telan" and "walap" that much of public funds entrusted in their care undetected? Easy..easy.., where money is concerned, they can become very ingeneous. False travel and entertainment claims, invoices and bills paid in thousands of RM over a peroid of time to non-existant purchases, contract payouts with rediculous cost, favourtism to crony companies and of course shares scam. They are good at that, their rice bowls, practically live off whatever they could get away with. Fantastic isn't it?

Harapkan pagar, pagar makan padi.

In the East Coast, during the BN reign, one had to pay RM30,000, on average, to get things done. Today, with PAS in government, the payout for favour is reduced to RM3,000.00. Still have to pay to get things done even to the PAS Pak Lebai. But in lesser amount, because PAS is a smaller fish. Smaller fish eats smaller fry lah! UMNO wakil rakyat came in Benz, stay and eat in luxurious hotels each time they "visit" the rakyat. So higher cost!

uchangeng
View Public Profile
Send a private message to uchangeng
Find all posts by uchangeng
Add uchangeng to Your Buddy List

#7 IP: 210.187.114.26 19-02-2004, 01:57 PM
joker2107
Budiman Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 534

hi i'm back for a moment with a poser 4 u to sleep over.
so soon after a new pm is at the helm we see a proliferation of "high profile cases" coming out into the open, presumably at the behest of the new pm to the ag to wrap up long exposed stuff.
given the number of the and complication of the cases already in court in such a short time, does it imply that papers were ready for the court work long ago, perhaps, perhaps pending the light to turn ...

joker2107
View Public Profile
Send a private message to joker2107
Find all posts by joker2107
Add joker2107 to Your Buddy List

#8 IP: 219.94.80.10 21-02-2004, 10:48 PM
kwchang
Guest Posts: n/a

stuff have been moved...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Some of you may have remembered that there were some disjointed stuff being posted to this thread - a large number of posts done within a short time on 21 Feb 2004 by someone using the handle of viviantan.

We have moved it to Internet & Trendlines.
You will notice that a lot of junk is found there.
They are basically thinly disguised postings which are actually SPAM to a Noni-juice direct marketing group.
All their postings have links to their websites through an advertising banner.
We have removed all the banners to protect our users as the visits to those websites will launch a spy-ware on your PC so that they may either link back to you or steal information from your keystrokes. Whatever the spyware does, we are unable to determine but nontheless, they are invading our privacy.

Administrator


kwchang

#9 IP: 219.95.22.72 22-02-2004, 07:01 AM
jeffooi
Guest Posts: n/a

If this Noni-juice direct-selling company persists in spamming this
Forum, we will petition for their AJL License to be revoked.

To chase away the monkeys, we just need to chop the tree.

I hope one Danielempire of Ampang is reading this.

No more warning after this.

http://www.usj.com.my/bulletin/upload/showthread.php?t=4388
_________________
The Daniel Empire Group believes that financial well-being also plays a role in good health. Freedom from worry and stress means that you can rest better, eat better, and live a more productive life.

Back to top


danielempire



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Tahiti , Hawaii
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:13 pm Post subject: Malaysians go to the polls - Saturday, March 20, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Saturday, March 20, 2004

Malaysians go to the polls -
Time to vote: Today, Sunday, March 21, more than 10 million registered voters in Malaysia will head to some 6,000 polling stations nationwide to cast their vote. The federal elections are being held together with the state elections of 12 states, excluding Sarawak. Polling is from 8am(0000GMT) till 5pm(0900GMT) and the first results are expected by 8pm(1200GMT). Stay with The Star Online for all the news and results. http://thestar.com.my

Support me to support you, Pak Lah tells Malaysians

PETALING JAYA: Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has appealed to voters to give a clear mandate to the Barisan Nasional today.

¨I support the people. I support the people on what they want for their future and a better future for the country, which they will prove through the ballot box.

¨So to me, you support me so that I can support you. I think it is very important. It's something I've been talking about,〃 he said in an interview on TV3 last night.

The Prime Minister was replying to questions raised by The Star deputy group chief editor II Datuk Wong Chun Wai and Utusan Malaysia deputy group chief editor Hamzah Sidek.

He said the people's support would give him the strength and the confidence to work for them.

¨The people wants a government that is efficient, the people want a government that works for the people, a government that is successful to bring progress, economic prosperity, peace and stability to the country,〃 he added.

Abdullah also said that he had received reports that some people were going to try to sabotage the election process by preventing voters from getting to the polling stations.

¨They may try to create traffic jams or somehow make it difficult for the voters. Such an action is tantamount to being anti-voters. But I tell the people not to worry and to come out to vote without fear,〃 he added.

Earlier in Penang, Abdullah cautioned the people against making the wrong choice and forsake the future of the country when casting their votes.


A big crowd of Barisan election workers ans supporters brought traffic along busy Jalan Dr Lim Chwee Leong to a stop when Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi made a pit stop at the Barisan operations centre for the Tanjung parliamentary constituency in Penang. Shouts of Hidup Barisan filled the air and Abdullah responded by hoding up his hands in the air. Abdullah's convoy swelled with supporters trailing the entourage along Lebuh Sunagi Pinang, jalan Dr Lim Chwee Leong, Jalan Carnavon, Penang Road, Jalan Codrington and Jalan Burma. Motorists were pleasantly surprised when the Prime Minister smiled and waved at them as he passed. --STARpic by GOH GAIK LEE.
He said the countryˇs political and economic situation was good and favoured investors and fund managers who had pledged to come in droves to Malaysia.

These investors have expressed full confidence in the Barisan Nasional leadership steering the nation to greater heights, he added.

¨So, what is your choice? What is it that you want? You want more politics or a stable government that can develop the country?〃 he told about 3,000 people at the official launch of IJM Berhadˇs affordable home project comprising 5,500 low- and low-medium-cost units at the Bandar Sri Pinang project site, off the Jelutong Expressway, yesterday.

He said investors and fund managers had indicated that the country could achieve greater progress if the Barisan coalition was returned to power with a bigger majority.

¨That is what they said, not me. I donˇt make that claim,〃 he added.

Abdullah said he had agreed to become Prime Minister after Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad stepped down on Oct 31 last year and it was now his responsibility to manage the country well.

¨It is like inheriting wealth from your father where you have to manage the wealth and not make it disappear,〃 he said.




http://thestar.com.my/election2004/story.asp?file=/2004/3/21/e2004_news/7591066&sec=e2004_news


9:07 PM - 2 eprops - 5 comments - email it

http://www.xanga.com/danielempire
_________________
The Daniel Empire Group believes that financial well-being also plays a role in good health. Freedom from worry and stress means that you can rest better, eat better, and live a more productive life.

Back to top


danielempire



Joined: 03 Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Location: Tahiti , Hawaii
Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: Invite Questions to Boost Your Sales





Website - http://www.professionalnetworkers.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2007

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:

  • Urgent request from David Lisonbee!!!!!!!!!! -- Urgent request from David Lisonbee!!!!!!!!!! (Mike Akins), 19:16:50 09/07/06 Thu
    [ Contact Forum Admin ]


    Forum timezone: GMT-8
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.