Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: Re: Why should he be eligable for both prizes, when the girls are not? | |
|
Author: Anonymous |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 08:56:36 01/03/08 Thu In reply to: 's message, "Why should he be eligable for both prizes, when the girls are not?" on 08:09:45 01/03/08 Thu because its obvious boys have an unfair advantage in pageants. If you do not have a boy contestant you will not understand this. Boys and families who have boy contestants pay the full Supreme fee and extras (same price as the girls) yet usually win NOTHING. Maybe a $100 bond or so. How fair is that. I'm not saying a boy WILL win our $10k prize but he will still be eligible for it. We're also offering the girls 3 Grand Supremes $4000 each 3 Mini Grand Supremes $2000 each 3 Mini Supremes $1200 We also have Photogenic Supremes, Novice Supremes and more awesome titles awarding over $1200 per title per age breakdown. Is it still THAT unfair that some boy contestants actually have a CHANCE to win some money too? [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| * sorry meant unfair DISadvantage (NT) | Anonymous | 08:57:26 01/03/08 Thu |
| Cause he can win the boy grand supreme and the girl grand supreme too! (NT) | Anonymous | 08:43:48 01/04/08 Fri |