Subject: Re: meh meh meh |
Author:
spangles
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 09:01:16 31/01/04 Saturday
Author Host/IP: cache-loh-ab07.proxy.aol.com/195.93.33.13 In reply to:
Billy
's message, "Re: meh meh meh" on 00:23:55 31/01/04 Saturday
>*Hands Norm a medal*
Bloody hell norm that was pretty good, as of all this pc stuff going about and sarah saying that geisha is sexest and wrong, what if they were a girl band? would it make a diffrence? also more to the point...why slag off harlow?
i hope we are not that stupid?
>
>King of rock.
>
>
>>I suppose Cpt. Poom that is the freudian approach.
>>Teagan unfortunatly could be suffering from the
>>Oedipus complex and is stuck in a sexual phase.
>>However, i think what is more likely is she has
>>realised she was incorrect in her assumptions that,
>>because geisha's entertained primarily men, they most
>>be "bitch's" as i like to call them, and also, the
>>assumption that geisha [the band] must be
>>sexist...pigs if you will. Personally, i doubt geisha
>>could be sexist as their singer, and other members of
>>the band, namely the singer, seem very feminine in
>>their ways [no offence intended]. I think teagan has
>>realised that she was wrong, but in her defence, is
>>turning to personal insults. Oh my, im fat and ginger,
>>mmmm good work watson!! But really, if you have to
>>stoop that low? c'mon.
>>I think you owe, mainly geisha, an apology. You are
>>really letting down the whole feminist group. I have
>>no problem with all ure equal rights mumbo jumbo, i
>>agree with you on alot of things, and wanting to see
>>more females bands, but you are wrong on this. I think
>>call it a day, and apologise, proove your not as bad
>>as us so called "neanderthals"
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
| |