VoyForums

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:02:46 10/20/06 Fri
Author: I beleive some "vicious animals" should be allowed.
Subject: That's bull.Who's qualified to say wether an animal is vicious?Sorry but just because an animal bites does not make it vicious.
In reply to: sci guy 's message, "again.... he would be assesed for visciousness" on 21:47:52 10/19/06 Thu

>no priors, no problem. And I agree... circumstances
>come into play... thus the assessment.
>
>
>>my 2 yr baby was sitting on the floor playing with our
>>German Shepard,he jumped up and bit her,he held her by
>>the arm until I came in and called his name.He did
>>leave puncture wounds and a bruise.Is he vicious?No.He
>>does not like strangers and he will protect his
>>family.And in our state he was fully protected because
>>she didn't knock.Another example,my oldest son grabbed
>>my littlest by the arms an started swinging him
>>around,he was screaming,our chow bit the oldest in the
>>back and made him let go.Left a scratch.Was he
>>vicious?No.Did he really hurt my son?No.Did he deserve
>>to put put down?No way.We had him for 16 more years
>>with no more bites.The only dogs that should be put
>>down are those that viciously attack for no
>>reason.People use gaurd dogs because they'd rather not
>>have a gun.Are those dogs vicious?Yep,but they have a
>>job to do,if you break into my home I hope you get
>>torn apart and my dog was doing his job.I think you
>>should judge the cercumstances along with the dog and
>>owner.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.