Complex Molecules and Organs 2 -- Science Disproves Evolution

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

There is no reason to believe that mutations or any natural process could ever produce any new organs�especially those as complex as the eye (b), the ear, or the brain (c).

b. �While today�s digital hardware is extremely impressive, it is clear that the human retina�s real-time performance goes unchallenged. Actually, to simulate 10 milliseconds (ms) of the complete processing of even a single nerve cell from the retina would require the solution of about 500 simultaneous nonlinear differential equations 100 times and would take at least several minutes of processing time on a Cray supercomputer. Keeping in mind that there are 10 million or more such cells interacting with each other in complex ways, it would take a minimum of 100 years of [1985] Cray time to simulate what takes place in your eye many times every second.� John K. Stevens, �Reverse Engineering the Brain,� Byte, April 1985, p. 287.

�The retina processes information much more than anyone has ever imagined, sending a dozen different movies to the brain.� Frank Werblin and Botond Roska, �The Movies in Our Eyes,� Scientific American, Vol. 296, April 2007, p. 73.

�Was the eye contrived without skill in opticks [optics], and the ear without knowledge of sounds?� Isaac Newton, Opticks (England: 1704; reprint, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1931), pp. 369�370.

�Certainly there are those who argue that the universe evolved out of a random process, but what random process could produce the brain of a man or the system of the human eye?� Wernher von Braun (probably the rocket scientist most responsible for the United States� success in placing men on the Moon) from a letter written by Dr. Wernher von Braun and read to the California State Board of Education by Dr. John Ford on 14 September 1972.

�What random process could possibly explain the simultaneous evolution of the eye�s optical system, the nervous conductors of the optical signals from the eye to the brain, and the optical nerve center in the brain itself where the incoming light impulses are converted to an image the conscious mind can comprehend?� Wernher von Braun, foreword to From Goo to You by Way of the Zoo by Harold Hill (Plainfield, New Jersey: Logos International, 1976), p. xi.